ArcticCrusher Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 How about some fact checking. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 The 97% thing is such a crock of shit lol 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted February 10, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 10, 2020 (edited) 97% consensus from 2% of the survey responses. Simply amazing video and study of the real consensus. Edited February 10, 2020 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted February 10, 2020 Author Share Posted February 10, 2020 3 minutes ago, Highmark said: 97% consensus from 2% of the survey responses. It gets better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted February 10, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 10, 2020 1 minute ago, ArcticCrusher said: It gets better. Watched it all. Simply amazing. I've heard the analysis before but this brings it all in together very well. Lying sum bitches. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 also Pretty much all the doom and gloom they said is happing, isn’t. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 The OP’s video is just fodder for deniers. If you analyzed current geological research papers using the methods described in the OP video you’d basically come to the conclusion that plate tectonics must be a hoax. Here, this one is better: 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted February 10, 2020 Author Share Posted February 10, 2020 48 minutes ago, XC.Morrison said: The OP’s video is just fodder for deniers. If you analyzed current geological research papers using the methods described in the OP video you’d basically come to the conclusion that plate tectonics must be a hoax. Here, this one is better: You're an idiot. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 30 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: You're an idiot. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManOnManOral Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 1 hour ago, XC.Morrison said: The OP’s video is just fodder for deniers. If you analyzed current geological research papers using the methods described in the OP video you’d basically come to the conclusion that plate tectonics must be a hoax. Here, this one is better: I think you should replace the word deniers with heretics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 13 minutes ago, ManOnManOral said: I think you should replace the word deniers with heretics. I think I'll put you down as "dismissive". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManOnManOral Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 5 minutes ago, XC.Morrison said: I think I'll put you down as "dismissive". And I will put you down as decisional. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 3 hours ago, XC.Morrison said: The OP’s video is just fodder for deniers. If you analyzed current geological research papers using the methods described in the OP video you’d basically come to the conclusion that plate tectonics must be a hoax. Here, this one is better: And yours is for Globull warming cultists. please explain how giving more money to politicians will change climate 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bussman Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 97% of the people we say says it’s so. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted February 11, 2020 Author Share Posted February 11, 2020 2 hours ago, XC.Morrison said: Lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 25 minutes ago, Sleepr2 said: And yours is for Globull warming cultists. please explain how giving more money to politicians will change climate Can’t we just reallocate the already huge subsidies that we as tax payers already provide the fossil fuel industry into investments in research and development in non carbon alternatives including both renewables and nuclear? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 31 minutes ago, XC.Morrison said: Can’t we just reallocate the already huge subsidies that we as tax payers already provide the fossil fuel industry into investments in research and development in non carbon alternatives including both renewables and nuclear? How about we stop with the Globull warming money grab and cut all government spending and waste. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 20 minutes ago, Sleepr2 said: How about we stop with the Globull warming money grab and cut all government spending and waste. Well we’d be in a recession right now if we did that. I’m fine with that. Better get on the horn to Orange Julius and git r done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 11 hours ago, XC.Morrison said: Well we’d be in a recession right now if we did that. I’m fine with that. Better get on the horn to Orange Julius and git r done. Trump been a complete failure when it come so cutting/reigning in spending. the alternative would have been worse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
washedupmxer Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 (edited) It's funny because kneel has used the 97% many times The sheep graphic was perfect Edited February 11, 2020 by washedupmxer 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 44 minutes ago, Sleepr2 said: Trump been a complete failure when it come so cutting/reigning in spending. the alternative would have been worse. I don’t know about that. Historically speaking, Presidents named Clinton have all had pretty decent fiscal records. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
washedupmxer Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 I would rather have questions that can't be answered that answers that can't be questioned Profound 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 17 hours ago, XC.Morrison said: The OP’s video is just fodder for deniers. If you analyzed current geological research papers using the methods described in the OP video you’d basically come to the conclusion that plate tectonics must be a hoax. Here, this one is better: 4,000 peer reviewed papers 97% in agreement. Climate change deniers: " Duh, you dumb me no watch". 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 Climate truths always bring the extra dumb out of boomboom lol 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted February 11, 2020 Author Share Posted February 11, 2020 1 minute ago, ACE said: Climate truths always bring the extra dumb out of boomboom lol He is the "dumber" in "dumb and dumber". 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.