Jump to content
Posted
  • Platinum Donating Member

Trump talking about not letting them in the White House press room.   While a dramatic step I think its more than warranted.   First they lied about him for 9 years.   Yes lied about him....I don't want to hear the shit about they were just doing their job.   They went above and beyond doing everything they could to get him defeated twice, not let him get his policies thru and worst of all get him impeached and imprisoned.

People can claim whatever they want but Trump did some very good things in his first term and the media had an extraordinarily small positive story percentage on him compared to other Presidents...even others they hated like GWB.   

If Trump does this they have nobody to blame but themselves.   Trump would just be shutting the casket....they put themselves in it.

What's hilarious is the likes of The Morning Joe trying (poorly) to act like they want to turn the page and be less biased.    

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/unprecedented-positive-media-for-harris-89-negative-for-trump/ar-AA1p44yn

That assessment comes from the latest review of network news from the conservative watchdog, the Media Research Center, which found that 84% of the coverage of Harris has been positive, while 89% of Trump’s has been negative on CBS, NBC, and ABC.

“Not only has Harris received 66% more airtime than former President Donald Trump, but the spin of Harris’s coverage has been more positive (84%) than any other major party nominee, even as Trump’s coverage has been nearly entirely hostile (89% negative),” according to the new report shared with Secrets.

“Add it all up, and the networks have granted the combined Democratic ticket of Harris-Walz 82% positive press, while Trump-Vance have faced 90% negative coverage,” author Rich Noyes wrote.

The media’s cheerleading has continued into this week’s Democratic National Convention in Chicago, where the pro-Harris coverage will reach a peak.

  • Replies 218
  • Views 4.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Trump talking about not letting them in the White House press room.   While a dramatic step I think its more than warranted.   First they lied about him for 9 years.   Yes lied about him....I don't wa

  • Thats what they have done Biden's whole term you fucking retard . 

  • If they are shown to knowing and purposefully lie, which they have, they are no longer news sources, just propaganda arms of the establishment.  They don't need to be in the white house, I support thi

Posted Images

Featured Replies

  • Canadian Donating Member
23 minutes ago, EvilBird said:

Mainstream media does nothing but interfere . 

If it wasnt for Elon buying twitter and podcasts like Joe Rogan they would of successfully brainwashed millions of people about Trump again.

Give your head a shake man and wake the fuck up.  

Look who you're asking.

 

:lol:

  • USA Donating Member
56 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

Well, it's called freedom of speech too....but sometimes, it comes with consequences.  Same with freedom of the press

You mean like defamation? Those consequences come through the judicial branch.

 

56 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

You don't mind much because you believe the lies.  For the rest of us, we're sick of their absolute bullshit.

You have such an active imagination of crybaby bullshit. It’s always one sided, dems control everything, they’re the only bad ones. Republicans would have a shitfit if Biden had FoxNews press credentials removed just as the Democrats would if Trump had CNN’s removed. :lolz:
 

And now we must alter our freedoms of press to teach them they’re not so free after all!

 

:smack:

  • Author
  • Platinum Donating Member
2 hours ago, akvanden said:

Freedom of press implies the absence of interference. Limiting access is subjective and as a democracy who values freedom of speech, press, etc, that is not path we should be going down. 

Freedom of press....that's rich.   Press implies honest, unbiased reporting of facts so spare me.

We are well down this path already by the actions of MSM.

Edited by Highmark

  • USA Donating Member
6 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Press implies honest, unbiased reporting of facts so spare me.

No it doesn’t, you’re smarter than that.

  • Author
  • Platinum Donating Member
20 minutes ago, akvanden said:

No it doesn’t, you’re smarter than that.

Bullshit Cronkite and Murrow would disagree and nowhere does freedom of press imply absence of interference.   Reporters and journalists face interference every single day.  You think war correspondences don't face interference.   You don't think the Biden admin ran interference on the laptop story?   FFS man remember the 50 "lying former intelligence officials."

Speaking of being smarter than that dude look in the mirror.

There is no free press anymore or very little of it.   It's almost all bought and paid for with an agenda.   Open your eyes.

Edited by Highmark

  • USA Donating Member
18 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Bullshit Cronkite and Murrow would disagree and nowhere does freedom of press imply absence of interference.

Not bullshit, and their opinion is irrelevant to the first amendment. The press is free to report on virtually any subject, even if the information is inaccurate, as long as it does not violate specific legal restrictions such as defamation.

 

20 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Speaking of being smarter than that dude look in the mirror.

As soon as I become a proponent of curbing our freedoms, I’ll look with you. :thumbsup:
 

23 minutes ago, Highmark said:

There is no free press anymore or very little of it.   It's almost all bought and paid for with an agenda.  

And they’re free to do that if they so choose.

  • USA Donating Member
2 hours ago, akvanden said:

You mean like defamation? Those consequences come through the judicial branch.

 

You have such an active imagination of crybaby bullshit. It’s always one sided, dems control everything, they’re the only bad ones. Republicans would have a shitfit if Biden had FoxNews press credentials removed just as the Democrats would if Trump had CNN’s removed. :lolz:
 

And now we must alter our freedoms of press to teach them they’re not so free after all!

 

:smack:

I understand your constant need to defend.

  • USA Donating Member
1 minute ago, Zambroski said:

I understand your constant need to defend.

I understand your constant need to deflect. 

59 minutes ago, akvanden said:


 

And they’re free to do that if they so choose.

They are free to peruse X an hour after a press conference because they can't get within a row of assholes to the press room as well...

Fuck around and find out.

  • USA Donating Member
Just now, akvanden said:

I understand your constant need to deflect. 

I understand your lack of comprehension.

  • USA Donating Member

Promoting censorship?

  • USA Donating Member
1 minute ago, Zambroski said:

I understand your lack of comprehension.

I understand your need to alter freedoms of press, through lack of comprehension.

 

 This is fun. :pc:

  • USA Donating Member
Just now, akvanden said:

I understand your need to alter freedoms of press, through lack of comprehension.

 

 This is fun. :pc:

I understand your inability to come up with a comprehensive thought.

  • USA Donating Member
2 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

I understand your inability to come up with a comprehensive thought.

That’s why I deflect to insults and word salads so often.

 

 

Oh wait….

9_9
 

 

 

Edited by akvanden

22 minutes ago, Deephaven said:

Promoting censorship?

It's called misinformation....remember?  At least that's what the swamp keeps telling people.

And that is why all these old threads are resurfacing, just to show you the kind of bullshit that was pedaled to you for the last 8+ years

Edited by racer254

  • USA Donating Member

So what is your cure?  You avoided my question.

30 minutes ago, Deephaven said:

So what is your cure?  You avoided my question.

I believe there is no real solution.

 X probably has the best 'protection' in place with community notes. I certainly don't expect CNN to devote the last 5 minutes of each show with  fact checking on their reporting.

The only thing I think that would ever bring us back to true reporting is eyes on the show. If like MSNBC you can only pull 35k people in the prize demo to your show, in time they will have to pull the plug and sell of the station for returnable bottle money.

  • Gold Donating Member
2 hours ago, Deephaven said:

Promoting censorship?

Of course, the right has been pushing farther and farther right, and what’s all the way to the right? Fascism. 

  • USA Donating Member
29 minutes ago, Snake said:

I believe there is no real solution.

 X probably has the best 'protection' in place with community notes.

No protection needed.  Freedom of speech assures that.  You do however have to have the wherewithal to make sure your side is represented. 

  • USA Donating Member
8 hours ago, akvanden said:

That’s why I deflect to insults and word salads so often.

 

 

Oh wait….

9_9
 

 

 

I really don't pay much attention to what your slant is with a debate.  It's almost always defending your overlords which INCLUDES the lying media.  You are a perfect little subject to them.

7 hours ago, Deephaven said:

So what is your cure?  You avoided my question.

You mean like ALL the questions thrown your way and how you just ignore them and ghost for a while?

7 hours ago, Snake said:

I believe there is no real solution.

 X probably has the best 'protection' in place with community notes. I certainly don't expect CNN to devote the last 5 minutes of each show with  fact checking on their reporting.

The only thing I think that would ever bring us back to true reporting is eyes on the show. If like MSNBC you can only pull 35k people in the prize demo to your show, in time they will have to pull the plug and sell of the station for returnable bottle money.

It's hard to do anything when those that make the laws defend breaking them at their behest and slight or ignore the Constitution at will.  It's easy to see where this is going when you can see the ones that support this having a kitten.

  • USA Donating Member
6 hours ago, Wildboer said:

Of course, the right has been pushing farther and farther right, and what’s all the way to the right? Fascism. 

:lol: 

"Disinformation Czar!!!"

14 hours ago, akvanden said:

Freedom of press implies the absence of interference. Limiting access is subjective and as a democracy who values freedom of speech, press, etc, that is not path we should be going down. 

odd because the biden admin was paying providers to do just that and you have been silent.

did you miss the last 4 years? Well the msm wants you to so you do I guess. 

remember when nobody is above the law? That was a good one especially coming from democrats 

  • Canadian Donating Member
1 hour ago, Zambroski said:

I really don't pay much attention to what your slant is with a debate.  It's almost always defending your overlords which INCLUDES the lying media.  You are a perfect little subject to them.

You mean like ALL the questions thrown your way and how you just ignore them and ghost for a while?

It's hard to do anything when those that make the laws defend breaking them at their behest and slight or ignore the Constitution at will.  It's easy to see where this is going when you can see the ones that support this having a kitten.

:lol:

He doesn't even see it.

  • Canadian Donating Member
2 minutes ago, Roosting said:

odd because the biden admin was paying providers to do just that and you have been silent.

did you miss the last 4 years? Well the msm wants you to so you do I guess. 

remember when nobody is above the law? That was a good one especially coming from democrats 

He's miss a lot more than the last 4 years.

8 hours ago, Wildboer said:

Of course, the right has been pushing farther and farther right, and what’s all the way to the right? Fascism. 

you mis spelled democrats 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.