Jump to content
Posted
  • Platinum Donating Member

Trump talking about not letting them in the White House press room.   While a dramatic step I think its more than warranted.   First they lied about him for 9 years.   Yes lied about him....I don't want to hear the shit about they were just doing their job.   They went above and beyond doing everything they could to get him defeated twice, not let him get his policies thru and worst of all get him impeached and imprisoned.

People can claim whatever they want but Trump did some very good things in his first term and the media had an extraordinarily small positive story percentage on him compared to other Presidents...even others they hated like GWB.   

If Trump does this they have nobody to blame but themselves.   Trump would just be shutting the casket....they put themselves in it.

What's hilarious is the likes of The Morning Joe trying (poorly) to act like they want to turn the page and be less biased.    

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/unprecedented-positive-media-for-harris-89-negative-for-trump/ar-AA1p44yn

That assessment comes from the latest review of network news from the conservative watchdog, the Media Research Center, which found that 84% of the coverage of Harris has been positive, while 89% of Trump’s has been negative on CBS, NBC, and ABC.

“Not only has Harris received 66% more airtime than former President Donald Trump, but the spin of Harris’s coverage has been more positive (84%) than any other major party nominee, even as Trump’s coverage has been nearly entirely hostile (89% negative),” according to the new report shared with Secrets.

“Add it all up, and the networks have granted the combined Democratic ticket of Harris-Walz 82% positive press, while Trump-Vance have faced 90% negative coverage,” author Rich Noyes wrote.

The media’s cheerleading has continued into this week’s Democratic National Convention in Chicago, where the pro-Harris coverage will reach a peak.

  • Replies 218
  • Views 4.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Trump talking about not letting them in the White House press room.   While a dramatic step I think its more than warranted.   First they lied about him for 9 years.   Yes lied about him....I don't wa

  • Thats what they have done Biden's whole term you fucking retard . 

  • If they are shown to knowing and purposefully lie, which they have, they are no longer news sources, just propaganda arms of the establishment.  They don't need to be in the white house, I support thi

Posted Images

Featured Replies

  • USA Donating Member

Whats the problem.  

91F4001F-6297-4F8C-9CAC-3BF06D15353F.jpeg

A1C42BE3-27D1-41FB-BF20-955E5B5E512E.jpeg

F5057F06-DC38-44A3-9FFA-92932043F937.jpeg

  • USA Donating Member

I mean....FrEEdOM oF Duh PreSs!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • USA Donating Member
28 minutes ago, Roosting said:

you mis spelled democrats 

He's upset that conservatives won't accept than men can get pregnant and know what the definition of a "woman" is.

Tough times ahead for some.  

  • USA Donating Member

Sad that the first amendment isn't important to some of you.

  • USA Donating Member
Just now, Deephaven said:

Sad that the first amendment isn't important to some of you.

Sad that some of you (two anyway) seem to think that's what this is all about.

Mental pygmies loaded with TDS.

  • USA Donating Member

Its like “some” were asleep during Covid.  Did you learn nothing?  

  • USA Donating Member
2 hours ago, Zambroski said:

I really don't pay much attention to what your slant is with a debate.  It's almost always defending your overlords which INCLUDES the lying media.  You are a perfect little subject to them.

Cool story. Let’s restrict our freedoms! 9_9

 

38 minutes ago, Roosting said:

odd because the biden admin was paying providers to do just that and you have been silent.

Ok, I’ll play along. What’s odd? did they force them to do or not to do something?

 

45 minutes ago, Roosting said:

remember when nobody is above the law?


 

Correct. Can you connect that to freedoms of press? 

 

  • USA Donating Member
3 minutes ago, akvanden said:

Cool story. Let’s restrict our freedoms! 9_9

 

Ok, I’ll play along. What’s odd? did they force them to do or not to do something?

 


 

Correct. Can you connect that to freedoms of press? 

 

Don't be upset that your sources for life are called lying frauds.  Because, that's what they are.

Also, Covidians talking about not wanting to restrict freedoms.  :lol: 

Edited by Zambroski

  • USA Donating Member
3 minutes ago, Cold War said:

Its like “some” were asleep during Covid.  Did you learn nothing?  

Many learned they liked being "in charge" and have the ability to tattle on those not compliant.

Like I've said before, if someone is still on the "safe and effective" train, they were and are 100% for Constitutional freedoms being ignored and mandates put in place to force compliance.

  • USA Donating Member
1 minute ago, Zambroski said:

Don't be upset that your sources for life are called lying frauds.  Because, that's what they are.

Oh, ok.  Cool story, again! :thumbsup:

  • USA Donating Member
Just now, akvanden said:

Oh, ok.  Cool story, again! :thumbsup:

Thanks.  Don't miss my edit tho...let me share it:

3 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

Don't be upset that your sources for life are called lying frauds.  Because, that's what they are.

Also, Covidians talking about not wanting to restrict freedoms.  :lol: 

 

  • Canadian Donating Member
8 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

Don't be upset that your sources for life are called lying frauds.  Because, that's what they are.

Also, Covidians talking about not wanting to restrict freedoms.  :lol: 

But my vax won't work unless you're vaxxed.

Science.

 

  • Canadian Donating Member
10 minutes ago, akvanden said:

Cool story. Let’s restrict our freedoms! 9_9

 

Ok, I’ll play along. What’s odd? did they force them to do or not to do something?

 


 

Correct. Can you connect that to freedoms of press? 

 

Are you forklift certified?

:lol:

  • USA Donating Member
1 minute ago, Zambroski said:

Many learned they liked being "in charge" and have the ability to tattle on those not compliant.

Like I've said before, if someone is still on the "safe and effective" train, they were and are 100% for Constitutional freedoms being ignored and mandates put in place to force compliance.

Brain rot.  Portraying the media as some sort of saving grace against corruption after they colluded with the State to take your freedoms,  and poison you. 

  • USA Donating Member
6 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

Don't be upset that your sources for life are called lying frauds.  Because, that's what they are.

You’re in full creative story mode this morning. It’s delightful. 

 

:pc:

  • USA Donating Member
3 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

But my vax won't work unless you're vaxxed.

Science.

 

Just like motorcycle helmets!!!!

1 minute ago, Cold War said:

Brain rot.  Portraying the media as some sort of saving grace against corruption after they colluded with the State to take your freedoms,  and poison you. 

Look at them go, now!  All up in arms with Joe and other podcasters.  If they could have just scrapped the Constitution and gotten their "Disinformation Czar" to start executing those in revolt.  Well.......

Just now, akvanden said:

You’re in full creative story mode this morning. It’s delightful. 

 

:pc:

You are getting stale.  Go sit next to SadHaven and relax a bit.

  • USA Donating Member
2 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

You are getting stale.

Oh, well let me start talking about lying overlords then. That’s fresh. ;)

  • USA Donating Member
2 minutes ago, akvanden said:

Oh, well let me start talking about lying overlords then. That’s fresh. ;)

Don't talk to loud.  They'll come and take your cheezy loyalty badge from you.  And take back all your therapy shots!!  :lol: 

  • USA Donating Member
1 minute ago, Zambroski said:

They'll come and take your cheezy loyalty badge from you.

Overlords, have mercy!

20 minutes ago, akvanden said:

Cool story. Let’s restrict our freedoms! 9_9

 

Ok, I’ll play along. What’s odd? did they force them to do or not to do something?

 


 

Correct. Can you connect that to freedoms of press? 

 

it's called creating a narrative or collusion if the info is damaging.

It's not a free press if the government provides the text and a list of targeted information with some $$$ for "going along" now is it.

see if you can tie the biden regime with putin cuz they do the same thing.

where is the free press you talk about?

  • USA Donating Member
1 minute ago, akvanden said:

Overlords, have mercy!

Just stay on your knees when they arrive.

  • USA Donating Member
1 minute ago, Roosting said:

it's called creating a narrative or collusion if the info is damaging.

It's not a free press if the government provides the text and a list of targeted information with some $$$ for "going along" now is it.

see if you can tie the biden regime with putin cuz they do the same thing.

where is the free press you talk about?

Poor Bambi.  

  • USA Donating Member
7 minutes ago, Roosting said:

it's called creating a narrative or collusion if the info is damaging.

It's not a free press if the government provides the text and a list of targeted information with some $$$ for "going along" now is it.


that’s a fanciful story, ripe for lawsuit. Can’t believe any of them have come forward with the target info and $$$$$ they were provided against Trump. But I’m sure the overlords wouldn’t allow that to happen. All hearsay!

 

10 minutes ago, Roosting said:

where is the free press you talk about?

Where? They’re still currently part of the White House press pool like they have been since the dawn of our democracy. :news:
 

10 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

Just stay on your knees when they arrive.

:hdchr:
 

:lolz:
 

11 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

Poor Bambi.  

More stories, please.

  • Author
  • Platinum Donating Member
56 minutes ago, Deephaven said:

Sad that the first amendment isn't important to some of you.

 

44 minutes ago, akvanden said:

Cool story. Let’s restrict our freedoms! 9_9

 

Ok, I’ll play along. What’s odd? did they force them to do or not to do something?

 


 

Correct. Can you connect that to freedoms of press? 

 

Should publishers be able to write anything they want or can they be held liable for false information even sued for damages?

SM isn't held to the same standards as published materials.  Congress gave them protection.

I'm guessing both you think Trump's speech that day inspired the riots on Jan 6th.   Wasn't that just free speech?

7 minutes ago, akvanden said:


that’s a fanciful story, ripe for lawsuit. Can’t believe any of them have come forward with the target info and $$$$$ they were provided against Trump. But I’m sure the overlords wouldn’t allow that to happen. All hearsay!

 

Where? They’re still currently part of the White House press pool like they have been since the dawn of our democracy. :news:
 

:hdchr:
 

:lolz:
 

More stories, please.

so you dont know anything about it?

What a stump

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.