Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

House majority leader to colleagues in 2016: ‘I think Putin pays’ Trump


Recommended Posts

  • Platinum Contributing Member
23 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

Excuse for the Republicans on tape talking about Trump being in the pay of Putin and agreeing to keep it to themselves. This story isn't about Trump being guilty. This story is about them being ready to keep quiet about it if he is.  

He said thinking for themselves. Definitely not talking about the Trump brigade. 

MN Momo and 'think' in the same sentence :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, SnowRider said:

MN Momo and 'think' in the same sentence :lol: 

No but he's a real good thinker.

Terrific thinker.

He thinks bigly.

Just ask him.

Don't ask anyone else though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, revkevsdi said:

No but he's a real good thinker.

Terrific thinker.

He thinks bigly.

Just ask him.

Don't ask anyone else though.

So speaking of Trump being paid by Russia, how much does it take to bribe a billionaire? :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, revkevsdi said:

No but he's a real good thinker.

Terrific thinker.

He thinks bigly.

Just ask him.

Don't ask anyone else though.

Couple of hatin' dandy daisies in here trying to puff their intellectual chests.  So sorry, that self naming title is just a title...more of a misnomer.  CUZ...I ain's seen shit that impresses me.  This guy has really convinced you boys and girls though....goody-neato! :lol:

 

Image result for sheep watching obama

13 minutes ago, Edmo said:

So speaking of Trump being paid by Russia, how much does it take to bribe a billionaire? :lol: 

They don't know.  Ones, tens, millions, billions, quatrillions, supercallifristicillions.......repeat. :lol:

"intellectually elite!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SnowRider said:

MN Momo :lol: Stupidity on full display :lmao: 

Come up with some better material already.  Your shit is weak.  Do something like this again:

Quote

 

On 12/24/2016 at 10:56 AM, SnowRider said:

I'm out - so fuck off :bc: You've catered to fucking low life's like Z while prodding me for months.  I left on my own free will and don't give a fuck if I ever post on here again

 

:lmao: 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Kivalo said:

Pretty fucked up and sadly par for the course when dealing with self serving politicians.

If this is true, why cant we hear the audio for ourselves?

Yeah, it's fucked up which is why it's not enough for the Republican Senate alone to investigate.

These assholes were prepared to keep quiet about Russian collusion.

Couple that with Trump's team hiding 18 contacts with the Russians.

His son saying they owe Russia Money.

A Russian Billionaire "overpaying " Trump for real estate. (Please don't be stupid about this one. There are no Russian Billionaire's who aren't connect to Putin.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Mainecat said:

Its always the Russians.........never any other country...always involving the Russians. How deep are they in our government when the entire republican party is covering for them?

This goes much deeper than anyone can imagine.

What a fucking idiot, why don't you inform the class what you see in your crystal ball. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, revkevsdi said:

IMG_5107.PNG

A jewish hack writer, he voted for Hillary and twice for Obama. He never wrote any articles critizing Obama or Hilary. He infact wrote an article calling Hillary to win, surley he is not a hypocritical butthurt liberal democrat thriving on the growing popularity of the antitrump movement. "They dont dig for the truth;they skim the media for anything that makes them feel better about themselves". Thats brilliant considering he writes 100% opinionated partisan articles. Never wrote once questioning if Hillary had done anything wrong. He infact cherry picked a quote from someone saying there might be evidence to support collusion during the election to fit the narrative of his article. And two months later there is zero evidence found. Maybe he should put a disclaimer that Clinton advisors also met with the Russian involved in the Flynn controversy. Im sure he skimmed over that to feel better about himself.

Edited by highmarketrider
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, highmarketrider said:

A jewish hack writer, he voted for Hillary and twice for Obama. He never wrote any articles critizing Obama or Hilary. He infact wrote an article calling Hillary to win, surley he is not a hypocritical butthurt liberal democrat thriving on the growing popularity of the antitrump movement. "They dont dig for the truth;they skim the media for anything that makes them feel better about themselves". Thats brilliant considering he writes 100% opinionated partisan articles. Never wrote once questioning if Hillary had done anything wrong. He infact cherry picked a quote from someone saying there might be evidence to support collusion during the election to fit the narrative of his article. And two months later there is zero evidence found. Maybe he should put a disclaimer that Clinton advisors also met with the Russian involved in the Flynn controversy. Im sure he skimmed over that to feel better about himself.

But Coach says it's "spot on". :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, highmarketrider said:

A jewish hack writer, he voted for Hillary and twice for Obama. He never wrote any articles critizing Obama or Hilary. He infact wrote an article calling Hillary to win, surley he is not a hypocritical butthurt liberal democrat thriving on the growing popularity of the antitrump movement. "They dont dig for the truth;they skim the media for anything that makes them feel better about themselves". Thats brilliant considering he writes 100% opinionated partisan articles. Never wrote once questioning if Hillary had done anything wrong. He infact cherry picked a quote from someone saying there might be evidence to support collusion during the election to fit the narrative of his article. And two months later there is zero evidence found. Maybe he should put a disclaimer that Clinton advisors also met with the Russian involved in the Flynn controversy. Im sure he skimmed over that to feel better about himself.

But look how good these "stories" make them feel about themselves. :lmao:

 

Just now, T1R9sledder said:

But Coach says it's "spot on". :lol:

:lol:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, revkevsdi said:

Yeah, it's fucked up which is why it's not enough for the Republican Senate alone to investigate.

These assholes were prepared to keep quiet about Russian collusion.

Couple that with Trump's team hiding 18 contacts with the Russians.

His son saying they owe Russia Money.

A Russian Billionaire "overpaying " Trump for real estate. (Please don't be stupid about this one. There are no Russian Billionaire's who aren't connect to Putin.)

That's it.  You are officially as fucking ignorant as SnowfaggyRider.  I wonder if he is an uber world class kayaker also?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member
2 hours ago, revkevsdi said:

Yeah, it's fucked up which is why it's not enough for the Republican Senate alone to investigate.

These assholes were prepared to keep quiet about Russian collusion.

Couple that with Trump's team hiding 18 contacts with the Russians.

His son saying they owe Russia Money.

A Russian Billionaire "overpaying " Trump for real estate. (Please don't be stupid about this one. There are no Russian Billionaire's who aren't connect to Putin.)

Proof on the bold???

Secondly, how about that audio, when do we the people get to hear it?

Edited by Kivalo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Kivalo said:

Proof on the bold???

Secondly, how about that audio, when do we the people get to hear it?

This.  

I think we've all about had it with these obscure sources and "intelligence" that get's printed by these biases hack pieces that are changing the direction of the truth.  Why the fuck can't we get proof?  Since when is WAPO, NYT, CNN, Fox or whoever "says so" enough?  They've squandered their integrity.  Especially the left media sources.  If there is a leak that is "a lie" let's fucking hear it then?  Let's call these writers and reporters out on their bullshit.  Why are we forced to either treat them as tabloid news or swallow it whole?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Kivalo said:

Proof on the bold???

Secondly, how about that audio, when do we the people get to hear it?

On the bold, you really think people in Russia can become billionaires without being connected to Putin?

i don't know when you will hear the audio. But get your excuses ready just in case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, highmarketrider said:

A jewish hack writer, he voted for Hillary and twice for Obama. He never wrote any articles critizing Obama or Hilary. He infact wrote an article calling Hillary to win, surley he is not a hypocritical butthurt liberal democrat thriving on the growing popularity of the antitrump movement. "They dont dig for the truth;they skim the media for anything that makes them feel better about themselves". Thats brilliant considering he writes 100% opinionated partisan articles. Never wrote once questioning if Hillary had done anything wrong. He infact cherry picked a quote from someone saying there might be evidence to support collusion during the election to fit the narrative of his article. And two months later there is zero evidence found. Maybe he should put a disclaimer that Clinton advisors also met with the Russian involved in the Flynn controversy. Im sure he skimmed over that to feel better about himself.

zero evidence found other than 18 instances of contact that they kept quiet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

zero evidence found other than 18 instances of contact that they kept quiet. 

"The people who described the contacts to Reuters said they had seen no evidence of wrongdoing or collusion between the campaign and Russia in the communications reviewed so far."

"Those discussions focused on mending U.S.-Russian economic relations strained by sanctions imposed on Moscow, cooperating in fighting Islamic State in Syria and containing a more assertive China, the sources said."

 

Quotes from an article posted in your own thread, which ironically you probably skimmed through contradicting your own post from the jewish partisan hack writer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member
30 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

On the bold, you really think people in Russia can become billionaires without being connected to Putin?

i don't know when you will hear the audio. But get your excuses ready just in case. 

Yeah, the only reason you claim they cant is it because it fits your narrative.

As usual, if someone doesn't agree with you they must be a Republican or at least defending Republicans. You constantly defend the D's but condemn the R's for the exact same behavior. This is called being a hypocrite and its why you have ZERO credibility. :bc:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
13 minutes ago, Kivalo said:

Yeah, the only reason you claim they cant is it because it fits your narrative.

As usual, if someone doesn't agree with you they must be a Republican or at least defending Republicans. You constantly defend the D's but condemn the R's for the exact same behavior. This is called being a hypocrite and its why you have ZERO credibility. :bc:

 

Kev is spot on.  Name a Russian billionaire without ties to Putin and the Oligarchy.  :snack:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 hour ago, revkevsdi said:

On the bold, you really think people in Russia can become billionaires without being connected to Putin?

i don't know when you will hear the audio. But get your excuses ready just in case. 

They became billionaires long before Putin was put in charge.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...