revkevsdi Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-contacts-idUSKCN18E106 Do I have to wait until fox reports on this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highmarketrider Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 "The people who described the contacts to Reuters said they had seen no evidence of wrongdoing or collusion between the campaign and Russia in the communications reviewed so far" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmo Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 23 minutes ago, highmarketrider said: "The people who described the contacts to Reuters said they had seen no evidence of wrongdoing or collusion between the campaign and Russia in the communications reviewed so far" Minor details. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 Just now, Edmo said: Minor details. Lets just stop at the headline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmo Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 3 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Lets just stop at the headline. Top dem leadership has said there's no evidence or smoking gun here. When is this fact going to make it down to the minions? The Russian narrative is toast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 6 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Lets just stop at the headline. That's all I do since my full frontal Democrat special labodomy. It's easier CuZ Me noT hAv to Tink fee MySElf. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 all normal stuff revkev Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 36 minutes ago, highmarketrider said: "The people who described the contacts to Reuters said they had seen no evidence of wrongdoing or collusion between the campaign and Russia in the communications reviewed so far" well then. that proves it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: all normal stuff revkev 100% 100% of the time for over two years Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 maybe they were wanting some recommends on good caviar and vodka? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmo Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 15 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said: well then. that proves it. So "no evidence of wrongdoing" is not enough to convince you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 3 minutes ago, Edmo said: So "no evidence of wrongdoing" is not enough to convince you? apparently a news article is enough to convince you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 29 minutes ago, Edmo said: Top dem leadership has said there's no evidence or smoking gun here. When is this fact going to make it down to the minions? The Russian narrative is toast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted May 18, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted May 18, 2017 30 minutes ago, Edmo said: Top dem leadership has said there's no evidence or smoking gun here. When is this fact going to make it down to the minions? The Russian narrative is toast. Can't fix stupid. And you can't be fixed Ask yourself why someone who was confirmed 96-4 just appointed a special counsel to look into the issue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 16 minutes ago, SnowRider said: Can't fix stupid. And you can't be fixed Ask yourself why someone who was confirmed 96-4 just appointed a special counsel to look into the issue I wouldn't get too excited over all this. after all, the doj set this up, and who runs it? I'm thinking this case was very close to being blown wide open and to buy more time, and think of ways to cover up, the trump admin decided to throw a wrench into things. the only good news, imo, is that comey and others in the fbi despise trump and will eventually get it all out in the open. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 52 minutes ago, Edmo said: Top dem leadership has said there's no evidence or smoking gun here. When is this fact going to make it down to the minions? The Russian narrative is toast. what do you think was going on with all these Russian connections? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmo Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: what do you think was going on with all these Russian connections? Unlike you, I'm not going to assume anything. And I keep hearing no evidence and no smoking gun. A special prosecutor does not prove guilt. Let me know when you have something concrete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted May 18, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted May 18, 2017 4 minutes ago, Edmo said: Unlike you, I'm not going to assume anything. And I keep hearing no evidence and no smoking gun. A special prosecutor does not prove guilt. Let me know when you have something concrete. Did you do the same with Hillary? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T1R9sledder Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 8 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: I wouldn't get too excited over all this. after all, the doj set this up, and who runs it? I'm thinking this case was very close to being blown wide open and to buy more time, and think of ways to cover up, the trump admin decided to throw a wrench into things. the only good news, imo, is that comey and others in the fbi despise trump and will eventually get it all out in the open. Now if it's proven there nothing here...are you going to accept the facts or be a crying snowflake? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Edmo said: Unlike you, I'm not going to assume anything. And I keep hearing no evidence and no smoking gun. A special prosecutor does not prove guilt. Let me know when you have something concrete. yeah you clowns never do that, huh? why is it none of you can ever throw in an opinion on the topic when asked? Edited May 18, 2017 by Snoslinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted May 18, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted May 18, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: yeah you clowns never do that, huh? why is it none of you can ever throw in an opinion on the topic when asked? Dude - it's the same approach they took to any Hillary news Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 9 minutes ago, T1R9sledder said: Now if it's proven there nothing here...are you going to accept the facts or be a crying snowflake? depends on what evidence is shown. I wanted a 100% non-partisan appointed commission to do this thing. I'm not so sure we have that. not yet anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: yeah you clowns never do that, huh? why is it none of you can answer that question? I can. And there was solid evidence she was up to some serious fuckery and the Obama admin knew it and covered for her. How te fuck did she get to destroy evidence under subpoena? wow. But, jury came back Nov 8th. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 Just now, SnowRider said: Dude - it's the same approach they took to any Hillary news yep that little pussy ryan said the same thing yesterday. they must think they're supporters are dumb as shit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 Just now, Zambroski said: I can. And there was solid evidence she was up to some serious fuckery and the Obama admin knew it and covered for her. How te fuck did she get to destroy evidence under subpoena? wow. But, jury came back Nov 8th. wtf are you babbling about now? the topic is the Russian connections and the question is what do you think they were about? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.