f7ben Posted June 24, 2023 Share Posted June 24, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, NaturallyAspirated said: And what exactly is the point of the psyop? Get people to believe vaccines work? There isn’t any logical end goal for this to be something like you are portraying. It’s silly childish fantasy. Neal The point my dim witted near retarded friend was to prove that the government could castigate entire segments of society for non compliance. Fire them from their jobs , remove their access to financial instruments , limit their free movement etc etc etc and fucking retards like you would support it fully. All that for refusing an experimental therapy to treat a disease that posed them zero risk. Refusing a therapy that had zero societal benefit and was known to the authorities to have zero societal benefit before they mandated it. We should never forget this any anyone that supports it still should be killed. Edited June 24, 2023 by f7ben 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted June 24, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 24, 2023 (edited) 14 minutes ago, f7ben said: The point my dim witted near retarded friend was to prove that the government could castigate entire segments of society for non compliance. Fire them from their jobs , remove their access to financial instruments , limit their free movement etc etc etc and fucking retards like you would support it fully. All that for refusing an experimental therapy to treat a disease that posed them zero risk. Refusing a therapy that had zero societal benefit and was known to the authorities to have zero societal benefit before they mandated it. We should never forget this any anyone that supports it still should be killed. I agree with mostly everything you've said here, but the side fighting back doesn't help themselves making shit up. Conspiracies do more harm than good. It's at the point right now where who's bullshit is more believable. Edited June 24, 2023 by Steve753 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted June 24, 2023 Share Posted June 24, 2023 2 hours ago, f7ben said: The point my dim witted near retarded friend was to prove that the government could castigate entire segments of society for non compliance. Fire them from their jobs , remove their access to financial instruments , limit their free movement etc etc etc and fucking retards like you would support it fully. All that for refusing an experimental therapy to treat a disease that posed them zero risk. Refusing a therapy that had zero societal benefit and was known to the authorities to have zero societal benefit before they mandated it. We should never forget this any anyone that supports it still should be killed. No US government fired private citizens from jobs. That didn’t happen here, for fucks sake…. Can you give some examples of US domestic movement being restricted? I worked across state lines every single month during the pandemic. I do not support the government firing any privately employed person, nor did or do I support limiting movement of citizens. You are fucking whacked and off base with your idiotic assessment. You look like a foolish retarded wet brain. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted June 24, 2023 Share Posted June 24, 2023 I wonder why? Any ideas Neal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted June 24, 2023 Share Posted June 24, 2023 56 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: No US government fired private citizens from jobs. That didn’t happen here, for fucks sake…. Can you give some examples of US domestic movement being restricted? I worked across state lines every single month during the pandemic. I do not support the government firing any privately employed person, nor did or do I support limiting movement of citizens. You are fucking whacked and off base with your idiotic assessment. You look like a foolish retarded wet brain. Neal Biden executive order un Sept 2019. Retard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted June 24, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 24, 2023 Just now, ArcticCrusher said: Biden executive order un Sept 2019. Retard. How could Biden do an executive order in 2019? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted June 24, 2023 Share Posted June 24, 2023 1 minute ago, ArcticCrusher said: Biden executive order un Sept 2019. Retard. Federal employees are not private business employees you absolute moron. The Federal government has the absolute right to require its employees to vaccinate, as should(does) private business have the right to require for their employees. Jesus fuck are you an imbecile. Neal 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted June 24, 2023 Share Posted June 24, 2023 3 minutes ago, Steve753 said: How could Biden do an executive order in 2019? I would wager he means the September 2021 EO… He isn’t smart enough to understand what’s going on though. Neal 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted June 24, 2023 Share Posted June 24, 2023 (edited) 2 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Federal employees are not private business employees you absolute moron. The Federal government has the absolute right to require its employees to vaccinate, as should(does) private business have the right to require for their employees. Jesus fuck are you an imbecile. Neal Actually the federal govt does not have the right to force an experimental treatment on people. Sorry about your luck fool. Also you conveniently fail to mention Biden’s large employer mandate that nearly cost me my own job. Quit being a disingenuous little twat and own what you supported Edited June 24, 2023 by f7ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted June 24, 2023 Share Posted June 24, 2023 Just now, f7ben said: Actually the federal govt does not have the right to force an experimental treatment on people. Sorry about your luck fool. Also you conveniently fail to mention Biden’s large employer mandate that nearly cost me my own job. Quit being a disingenuous little twat and own what you supported They have the right to force vaccinations though. Too bad for your incompetent dumbass. No one was required to be vaccinated, you could mask and test. SBYL. Fuck off prick. Neal 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted June 24, 2023 Share Posted June 24, 2023 39 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: They have the right to force vaccinations though. Too bad for your incompetent dumbass. No one was required to be vaccinated, you could mask and test. SBYL. Fuck off prick. Neal No he doesn't as he lost that battle in court. You fucking moron. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted June 24, 2023 Share Posted June 24, 2023 51 minutes ago, Steve753 said: How could Biden do an executive order in 2019? 2021. Sorry. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted June 24, 2023 Share Posted June 24, 2023 49 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Federal employees are not private business employees you absolute moron. The Federal government has the absolute right to require its employees to vaccinate, as should(does) private business have the right to require for their employees. Jesus fuck are you an imbecile. Neal Biden was told in Jan 2022 by your Supreme Court that he didn't have that right. He lost over and over again until he was forced to recall the executive order. He acted like a dictator with no authority. Glad you approved, you showed your true colors. A piece of fucking shit. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted June 24, 2023 Share Posted June 24, 2023 1 hour ago, NaturallyAspirated said: They have the right to force vaccinations though. Too bad for your incompetent dumbass. No one was required to be vaccinated, you could mask and test. SBYL. Fuck off prick. Neal 58 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: No he doesn't as he lost that battle in court. You fucking moron. Poor Neal , owned again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted June 24, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 24, 2023 1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said: No he doesn't as he lost that battle in court. You fucking moron. States have the right to do it though to their employees. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted June 24, 2023 Share Posted June 24, 2023 15 minutes ago, Steve753 said: States have the right to do it though to their employees. No they don't. The constitution is clear. You really don't know how far the tyranny was pushed by paying off judges and public health. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted June 24, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 24, 2023 7 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: No they don't. The constitution is clear. You really don't know how far the tyranny was pushed by paying off judges and public health. Look it up. Says they are free to do it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted June 24, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 24, 2023 All 50 states are states where vaccines are mandatory. In 1905, a Supreme Court case set the legal precedent for states to write their own vaccination laws and make vaccines mandatory. The case, known as Jacobson v. Massachusetts, was brought before the U.S. Supreme Court over smallpox vaccinations in Cambridge, MA. The town of Cambridge created an ordinance that required all adults receive a smallpox vaccination or be revaccinated in order to stop a small outbreak. Non-compliant residents were fined $5 ($150 in 2021). A resident by the last name of Jacobson took the town to court under the argument that the state was violating his constitutionally protected liberties with the mandatory vaccine requirement. The Supreme Court disagreed with Jacobson by stating that each state has police powers, also a Constitutional right for states, to make vaccines that are mandatory for the public health, safety and the common good. In sum, the interests of many overpower the interests of few. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted June 24, 2023 Share Posted June 24, 2023 20 minutes ago, Steve753 said: Look it up. Says they are free to do it. You're a fucking moron. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted June 24, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 24, 2023 1 minute ago, ArcticCrusher said: You're a fucking moron. All 50 states are states where vaccines are mandatory. In 1905, a Supreme Court case set the legal precedent for states to write their own vaccination laws and make vaccines mandatory. The case, known as Jacobson v. Massachusetts, was brought before the U.S. Supreme Court over smallpox vaccinations in Cambridge, MA. The town of Cambridge created an ordinance that required all adults receive a smallpox vaccination or be revaccinated in order to stop a small outbreak. Non-compliant residents were fined $5 ($150 in 2021). A resident by the last name of Jacobson took the town to court under the argument that the state was violating his constitutionally protected liberties with the mandatory vaccine requirement. The Supreme Court disagreed with Jacobson by stating that each state has police powers, also a Constitutional right for states, to make vaccines that are mandatory for the public health, safety and the common good. In sum, the interests of many overpower the interests of few. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted June 24, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 24, 2023 34 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: No they don't. The constitution is clear. You really don't know how far the tyranny was pushed by paying off judges and public health. Link to these “paid off” judges? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted June 24, 2023 Share Posted June 24, 2023 1 hour ago, f7ben said: Poor Neal , owned again Negative. You are turning into kooky fucker… Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted June 24, 2023 Share Posted June 24, 2023 Surprising how convinced Lloyd is of his lies. Baaaaaaaaaaaah! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted June 24, 2023 Share Posted June 24, 2023 8 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Negative. You are turning into kooky fucker… Neal Nobody was forced into anything derrrr derrrrr , free movement wasn’t limited derd defddddddd. God damn son, you’re dumb as snowrider Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted June 24, 2023 Share Posted June 24, 2023 1 minute ago, f7ben said: Nobody was forced into anything derrrr derrrrr , free movement wasn’t limited derd defddddddd. God damn son, you’re dumb as snowrider You are fucking dripper level dumb. Jesus Christ! Fuckin fool. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.