Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Wanna be dictator


Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Steve753 said:

Explain how I'm defending them?

 

17 minutes ago, Crnr2Crnr said:

but... but... but... everyone else

Trump could have avoided all this

It's the dissemination that's going to bite him in the ass... eventually 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Steve753 said:

They asked for them back, Biden gave them back. Trump held on to them after being asked. Why is that so hard to comprehend? Your excuses only make you look dumb.

what’s hard to comprehend is that the only one who actually had authority to possess them is the potus.  Hate trump fine, but what they’re doing is unprecedented, will make the country more divided, and worst of all, litigating it in the media just like you’re doing now.  Let’s let the lawyers make their arguments.  As I understand it, the Presidential Records Act is being ignored here and they’re bloviating this espionage nonsense abmbd hyping these potential jail sentences.  Completely absurd.  Nothing was sold, destroyed or compromised, and this is the precedent we want to set moving forward with presidents, we’re going down a dangerous road imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 minute ago, DriftBusta said:

what’s hard to comprehend is that the only one who actually had authority to possess them is the potus.  Hate trump fine, but what they’re doing is unprecedented, will make the country more divided, and worst of all, litigating it in the media just like you’re doing now.  Let’s let the lawyers make their arguments.  As I understand it, the Presidential Records Act is being ignored here and they’re bloviating this espionage nonsense abmbd hyping these potential jail sentences.  Completely absurd.  Nothing was sold, destroyed or compromised, and this is the precedent we want to set moving forward with presidents, we’re going down a dangerous road imo.

For fuck sakes dude, what the hell was Trump doing when he got all of his followers believing he was going to lock Hillary up? It's the same God dam thing, but because you hate Hillary you were ok with it. Both fucking parties need to change and get rid of the old dead wood.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DriftBusta said:

what’s hard to comprehend is that the only one who actually had authority to possess them is the potus.  

As I understand it, the Presidential Records Act is being ignored here

 Nothing was sold, destroyed or compromised, and this is the precedent we want to set moving forward with presidents, we’re going down a dangerous road imo.

he didn't hold the authority upon leaving office, neither did Biden or Pence.

there's people far more keenly aware of the laws, legalities and potential criminal behavior than you, I or a bunch of dipfucks on a snowmobile message forum.

otb, how can you, I or anyone else here be certain of that... by taking Trump's word for it?  :roflcrying:

in my other thread, there's a good chance he could still face charges in New Jersey... for dissemination which is completely different than the possession charges in Florida. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said:

They are copies already.:lol:

They're not originals.

Well ya, but if the information was important enough where they felt the need keep, either could have made copies to keep and returned what was requested and no one would know. This is what doesn't make sense, how do they know Biden didn't have copies already somewhere else when he willingly said they can have them (there is a reason they aren't suppose to leave the building)? Hillary had copies on her private server she wasn't suppose to have. The only difference is supposedly Trump was asked to return them and didn't. Nobody would know if Hillary had files if her server hadn't been hacked and when Anthony Weiner's computer was taken. How long did Biden have files that he shouldn't and just because he said they could have them when somebody stumbled across them doesn't mean he doesn't have copies stashed somewhere secure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, airflite1 said:

Well ya, but if the information was important enough where they felt the need keep, either could have made copies to keep and returned what was requested and no one would know. This is what doesn't make sense, how do they know Biden didn't have copies already somewhere else when he willingly said they can have them (there is a reason they aren't suppose to leave the building)? Hillary had copies on her private server she wasn't suppose to have. The only difference is supposedly Trump was asked to return them and didn't. Nobody would know if Hillary had files if her server hadn't been hacked and when Anthony Weiner's computer was taken. How long did Biden have files that he shouldn't and just because he said they could have them when somebody stumbled across them doesn't mean he doesn't have copies stashed somewhere secure.

This whole thing stinks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...