Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

‘It’s not a pretty picture’: Russia’s support is growing in the developing world


Recommended Posts

  • Platinum Contributing Member

Russia’s sphere of influence is growing as propaganda and diplomatic efforts gather momentum and Western powers fail to counter the Kremlin’s narratives, analysts suggest.

A report from the Economist Intelligence Unit earlier this month indicated that net support for Russia had grown in the year since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, as Moscow ramps up its diplomatic charm offensive of previously neutral or geopolitically unaligned countries.

 

Assessing countries’ enforcement of sanctions, U.N. voting patterns, domestic political trends and official statements alongside economic, political, military and historical ties, the EIU observed a significant uptick in the number of countries now leaning toward Russia — from 29 last year to 35 today.

“China remains the most significant country in this category, but other developing countries (notably South Africa, Mali and Burkina Faso) have also moved into this grouping, which accounts for 33% of the world’s population,” the EIU report said, adding these trends highlight Russia’s growing influence in Africa.

Chinese President Xi Jinping met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow earlier this month and the two leaders vowed to deepen economic ties.

While South Africa caused controversy in February by holding joint military drills with Russia and China on the anniversary of the invasion of Ukraine. South African Foreign Minister Naledi Pandor indicated that the “massive transfer of arms” from the West to Ukraine had changed Pretoria’s outlook and lauded the country’s “growing economic bilateral relationship” with Moscow.

The EIU said the number of neutral countries rose from 32 to 35, now representing almost 31% of the global population.

 

“Some previously Western-aligned countries, including Colombia, Turkey and Qatar, have moved into this category as their governments are seeking to reap economic benefits from engaging with both sides,” the EIU said. 

“However, both Russia and China are upping the ante in recruiting those countries that are non-aligned and neutral.”

By contrast, the number of countries actively condemning Russia fell from 131 to 122. The U.S. and European Union-led bloc including “West-leaning” countries represents around 36% of the global population, and has exhibited a “strong level of collaboration on sanctions” along with consistent military and economic support for Ukraine, the report said.

However, this bloc also represents just under 68% of global GDP, highlighting an emerging disconnect between wealthy Western economies and the Global South.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said:

I wonder why.

The entire Australian parliament walked out on Zelenski when he wanted to ask for more $$$$ for Ukraine.

:lol:

20 out of 183 means “entire” to you. Surprising. 9_9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This what happens when you have a brainless empty suit dementia patient for a president? Seems like most of the time he just sends Kamala. When she speaks they laugh and laugh. Real winning team here for the dems. :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The BRICS partners will be over half the worlds population. The more you idiots cheer on western occupation and abuse the more people around the world will run to the open arms of Russia and china. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Anler said:

The BRICS partners will be over half the worlds population. The more you idiots cheer on western occupation and abuse the more people around the world will run to the open arms of Russia and china. 

Brazil was the latest to tell the US to fuck off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ArcticCrusher said:

Brazil was the latest to tell the US to fuck off.

Mexico showed interest in joining and the next week Lindsey graham wanted to invade LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Anler said:

Mexico showed interest in joining and the next week Lindsey graham wanted to invade LOL

Mexico president yesterday said we live under oligarchy controlled by a few and not a democracy.

Yet the morons still can't put two and two together.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Mexico president yesterday said we live under oligarchy controlled by a few and not a democracy.

Yet the morons still can't put two and two together.

Latin America has been controlled by European oligarchs for hundreds of years. When they try to change that they get couped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it’s essentially looking like a WW3.

One must now ask the question, do we want to let Russia and it’s allies take over the massive land mass that is Ukraine, it’s resources and strategic location?

I say no.

I would prefer we ramp up resource and defence production and keep the fight in Ukrainian territory.

What we are injecting into the fight now will look like a paltry sum compared to what will be necessary if the Ruskies occupy all of Ukraine.

 

Edited by Voodoo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Voodoo said:

So it’s essentially looking like a WW3.

One must now ask the question, do we want to let Russia and it’s allies take over the massive land mass that is Ukraine, it’s resources and strategic location?

I say no.

I would prefer we ramp up resource and defence production and keep the fight in Ukrainian territory.

The problem in Ukraine is 85% USA.

How about they fuck off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Voodoo said:

So it’s essentially looking like a WW3.

One must now ask the question, do we want to let Russia and it’s allies take over the massive land mass that is Ukraine, it’s resources and strategic location?

I say no.

I would prefer we ramp up resource and defence production and keep the fight in Ukrainian territory.

Ukraine is toast. Bakmut is surrounded and uki deaths are estimated as high as 250k. Ww3 it is. 

 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Anler said:

Ukraine is toast. Bakmut is surrounded and uki deaths are estimated as high as 250k. Ww3 it is. 

 

At the rate taking them to still not have control of bakmut, they must be on the ten year plan to take all of ukraine. They’re certainly toast. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Anler said:

Ukraine is toast. Bakmut is surrounded and uki deaths are estimated as high as 250k. Ww3 it is. 

 

That is unfortunate. 
If Ukraine does fall to the invasion, and they get dug in, it will be much harder to push them back to pre 2010 borders.

Seems we learned nothing from history. 
The Nazis ran over Europe in 1939/1940. 
It took 5 years of blood, sweat and tears to push them back…with Russian help.

This would be no different.

We have learned nothing, Western Democracies.

Canada lost under 200 soldiers in Afghanistan, in 15 years. On D day Canada lost that many in under 5 minutes

Some of the doves around here must have cut history class..

 

 

Edited by Voodoo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, akvanden said:

At the rate taking them to still not have control of bakmut, they must be on the ten year plan to take all of ukraine. They’re certainly toast. 

It would seem so but it rather appears the Russians set a trap for them there. Let them come in and get smashed. The ukis don't really have anything left now. 

Don't worry, NATO will come up with something to get involved. If Ukraine was doing as well as we have been told we wouldn't be having these discussions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Voodoo said:

That is unfortunate. 
If Ukraine does fall to the invasion, and they get dug in, it will be much harder to push them back to pre 2010 borders.

Seems we learned nothing from history. 
The Nazis ran over Europe in 1939/1940. 
It took 5 years of blood, sweat and tears to push them back…with Russian help.

This would be no different.

We have learned nothing, Western Democracies.

Canada lost under 200 soldiers in Afghanistan, in 15 years. On D day Canada lost that many in under 5 minutes

Some of the doves around here must have cut history class..

 

 

We haven't won anything in 80 years and at what cost? We have helped build China into a super power and NOW we decide we need to go to war with them? It's fucking madness is what it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

The problem in Ukraine is 85% USA.

How about they fuck off.

I can agree on that.

Our number one friend and ally does have a habit of getting in too late, too early, too much and not enough.

We’ve most times gone along as a junior partner.

I suggest Canada ramps up defence spending.

We are going to need it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol



×
×
  • Create New...