SkisNH Posted February 2, 2022 Share Posted February 2, 2022 2 hours ago, Mainecat said: Caught doing what? In violation of HIS own rules Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriftBusta Posted February 2, 2022 Share Posted February 2, 2022 4 hours ago, Mainecat said: So he did the right thing and resigned. What’s so wrong about this? you can’t possibly be that stupid. Wait, I guess you must be. 1 hour ago, spin_dry said: Probably the same thing O’rielly was canned for. As well as the boss of Fox. Sexually terrorizing young women. yes whatever you do be sure and deflect! 57 minutes ago, spin_dry said: You’re finally seeing that there’s no difference between right and left. Excellent. Except all those just cited were inside the Beltway elitist liberals. Lowest form of human scum there is 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 2 hours ago, DriftBusta said: you can’t possibly be that stupid. Wait, I guess you must be. yes whatever you do be sure and deflect! Except all those just cited were inside the Beltway elitist liberals. Lowest form of human scum there is Triggered a CNN head leaving because he violated his own rules? Like I said he quit good for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racinfarmer Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 51 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Triggered a CNN head leaving because he violated his own rules? Like I said he quit good for him. He was most likely given the choice to quit or be fired. He chose to quit for the optics. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriftBusta Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 1 hour ago, Mainecat said: Triggered a CNN head leaving because he violated his own rules? Like I said he quit good for him. Yeah its not like his network wasn't full of sanctimonius liars, pushing bullshit fake stories about Trump to this day, all while behaving like scum. Zucker, Lemon, Cuomo, a couple producers who's names escape me, my god, they're all dirtbags and its on the record. Zucker lived this lie for years, it was the secret that everyone on the inside knew. These are your people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. Jackson Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 1 hour ago, Mainecat said: Triggered a CNN head leaving because he violated his own rules? Like I said he quit good for him. So he set rules as the head of an organization for everyone to follow but he broke one. You don't find that troubling? We're not talking about taking 15 minutes of a coffee break when the handbook says 10. It really comes down to the fact that he got busted and they more than likely gave him a choice. Kind of follows the liberal mantra these days, "do as I say but not as I do". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 11 hours ago, DriftBusta said: Yeah its not like his network wasn't full of sanctimonius liars, pushing bullshit fake stories about Trump to this day, all while behaving like scum. Zucker, Lemon, Cuomo, a couple producers who's names escape me, my god, they're all dirtbags and its on the record. Zucker lived this lie for years, it was the secret that everyone on the inside knew. These are your people. 11 hours ago, J. Jackson said: So he set rules as the head of an organization for everyone to follow but he broke one. You don't find that troubling? We're not talking about taking 15 minutes of a coffee break when the handbook says 10. It really comes down to the fact that he got busted and they more than likely gave him a choice. Kind of follows the liberal mantra these days, "do as I say but not as I do". You both explain why liberals need to change the rules to make this behavior more acceptable. Just look at how Clinton did it back in the 90's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catalina Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 If they were 'peers', this would be no problem. Workplace romances happen all the time. He was the CEO, so by definition, she worked for him. That is where the problem. Most all companies of any size prevent bosses from having relationships with people who work for them. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. Jackson Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 20 minutes ago, Catalina said: If they were 'peers', this would be no problem. Workplace romances happen all the time. He was the CEO, so by definition, she worked for him. That is where the problem. Most all companies of any size prevent bosses from having relationships with people who work for them. You don't dip your pen in company ink. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 32 minutes ago, Catalina said: If they were 'peers', this would be no problem. Workplace romances happen all the time. He was the CEO, so by definition, she worked for him. That is where the problem. Most all companies of any size prevent bosses from having relationships with people who work for them. Yep, some companies even require that if 2 employees get involved or married, one is required to leave. If you notice a hell of a lot of politicians and people now are keeping their surname rather than take the name of spouse or even hyphenate because it provides anonymity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted February 3, 2022 Share Posted February 3, 2022 Wow. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.