Gold Member EvilBird Posted January 3, 2022 Gold Member Share Posted January 3, 2022 2 minutes ago, SSFB said: Being kicked off a private platform is not censorship. Ok. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member EvilBird Posted January 3, 2022 Gold Member Share Posted January 3, 2022 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_of_Twitter You do realize Twitter works with Governments on Censorship all around the world....Wikipedia would of told you that. Private Platform lmao ...yup so private. On August 28, in the wake of even more calls for censorship from government officials, Twitter permanently suspended Mr. Berenson from its platform, citing ‘repeated violations of our COVID-19 misinformation rules’,” the lawsuit notes. “Mr. Berenson did not violate those rules. Twitter, on the other hand, broke its promises to Mr. Berenson as well as its policies, and violated his rights as it served the federal government’s censorship demands.” 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted January 3, 2022 Share Posted January 3, 2022 (edited) 30 minutes ago, SSFB said: Being kicked off a private platform is not censorship. I disagree witb that premise but Ok fine. but now by doing this is the argument that certain social media sites have argued in court that they have no control of what people put in there fourms out the window seeing as clearly they have been and continue to do ? Edited January 3, 2022 by Ez ryder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted January 3, 2022 Share Posted January 3, 2022 3 hours ago, Ez ryder said: Of what ? Giving her opinion on covid ? A opinion backed by some doctors and scientists around the world not on the take from big pharma ? How dare she Go fuck your self Mr that's what dictators do No it’s what the owners do when someone….anyone breaks the rules. YOUR OUT. Your clueless…..you really are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 3, 2022 Share Posted January 3, 2022 1 hour ago, SSFB said: Being kicked off a private platform is not censorship. Well, isn’t it though? It comes down to what was said, the rules and consistency with the organization enforcing them. Also, “private”? But, before I unpack that some more, you can explain your suitcase first if you wish. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 3, 2022 Share Posted January 3, 2022 13 minutes ago, Mainecat said: No it’s what the owners do when someone….anyone breaks the rules. YOUR OUT. Your clueless…..you really are. You should just shut the fuck up you ignorant hypocrite. Squid brain. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSFB Posted January 3, 2022 Share Posted January 3, 2022 1 minute ago, Zambroski said: Well, isn’t it though? It comes down to what was said, the rules and consistency with the organization enforcing them. Also, “private”? But, before I unpack that some more, you can explain your suitcase first if you wish. No, it's not censorship. Yes, Twitter is a private company. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckf Posted January 3, 2022 Share Posted January 3, 2022 1 hour ago, SSFB said: Being kicked off a private platform is not censorship. Agreed. What happened to Trump's social media platform. Wasn't it supposed to have been up and running by now? Serious question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 3, 2022 Share Posted January 3, 2022 9 minutes ago, SSFB said: No, it's not censorship. Yes, Twitter is a private company. So, can’t explain. Got it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSFB Posted January 3, 2022 Share Posted January 3, 2022 4 minutes ago, Zambroski said: So, can’t explain. Got it. There's nothing to explain Zammy. I know you're confused, but you're used to that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 3, 2022 Share Posted January 3, 2022 Just now, SSFB said: There's nothing to explain Zammy, now go eat some crayons. This is why people laugh at libertarians. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted January 3, 2022 Share Posted January 3, 2022 13 minutes ago, SSFB said: No, it's not censorship. Yes, Twitter is a private company. Not with section 230 it isn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member EvilBird Posted January 3, 2022 Gold Member Share Posted January 3, 2022 30 minutes ago, Mainecat said: No it’s what the owners do when someone….anyone breaks the rules. YOUR OUT. Your clueless…..you really are. *You're. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSFB Posted January 3, 2022 Share Posted January 3, 2022 10 minutes ago, ckf said: Agreed. What happened to Trump's social media platform. Wasn't it supposed to have been up and running by now? Serious question. Well they tried to use open source software while claiming it was their own so that put a monkey wrench into things. Hard to believe that would happen with Trump, I know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 3, 2022 Share Posted January 3, 2022 9 minutes ago, ckf said: Agreed. What happened to Trump's social media platform. Wasn't it supposed to have been up and running by now? Serious question. If I had to guess on that Trump show shit, The R’s are begging him to hold off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 3, 2022 Share Posted January 3, 2022 4 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Not with section 230 it isn't. I love it when vague, general statements are tossed out followed by a refusal to explain and debate them. This is considered “winning” now. ”The vaccine was designed to prevent severe symptoms.” 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 3, 2022 Share Posted January 3, 2022 8 minutes ago, SSFB said: There's nothing to explain Zammy. I know you're confused, but you're used to that. There’s plenty. But, I get it. Best to stay out of specifics and just claim a win. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSFB Posted January 3, 2022 Share Posted January 3, 2022 2 minutes ago, Zambroski said: There’s plenty. But, I get it. Best to stay out of specifics and just claim a win. I know you think your word salad is good debate arguments, but they're not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 3, 2022 Share Posted January 3, 2022 1 minute ago, SSFB said: I know you think your word salad is good debate arguments, but they're not. Then explain how you feel this isn’t censorship and the “private” comment. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member EvilBird Posted January 3, 2022 Gold Member Share Posted January 3, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member EvilBird Posted January 3, 2022 Gold Member Share Posted January 3, 2022 Just ignored my Wikipedia comment too.... So again. Censorship of Twitter refers to Internet censorship by governments that block access to Twitter, or censorship by Twitter itself. Twitter censorship also includes governmental notice and take down requests to Twitter, which Twitter enforces in accordance with its Terms of Service when a government or authority submits a valid removal request to Twitter indicating that specific content (such as a tweet) is illegal in their jurisdiction. pRiVaTe cOmPaNy ....Sure , that works with Governments.. does Freedom Sledder get Big Brother to tell them what gets deleted also? Didnt think so 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted January 3, 2022 Share Posted January 3, 2022 1 minute ago, EvilBird said: Just ignored my Wikipedia comment too.... So again. Censorship of Twitter refers to Internet censorship by governments that block access to Twitter, or censorship by Twitter itself. Twitter censorship also includes governmental notice and take down requests to Twitter, which Twitter enforces in accordance with its Terms of Service when a government or authority submits a valid removal request to Twitter indicating that specific content (such as a tweet) is illegal in their jurisdiction. pRiVaTe cOmPaNy ....Sure , that works with Governments.. does Freedom Sledder get Big Brother to tell them what gets deleted also? Didnt think so For the simpletons, this means Twitter is a tool the government uses to suppress your 1st amendment right. That's why its a big deal. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSFB Posted January 3, 2022 Share Posted January 3, 2022 4 minutes ago, EvilBird said: Just ignored my Wikipedia comment too.... So again. Censorship of Twitter refers to Internet censorship by governments that block access to Twitter, or censorship by Twitter itself. Twitter censorship also includes governmental notice and take down requests to Twitter, which Twitter enforces in accordance with its Terms of Service when a government or authority submits a valid removal request to Twitter indicating that specific content (such as a tweet) is illegal in their jurisdiction. pRiVaTe cOmPaNy ....Sure , that works with Governments.. does Freedom Sledder get Big Brother to tell them what gets deleted also? Didnt think so So the government is or isn't forcing Twitter to remove these people? It sounds like you're arguing both. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted January 3, 2022 Share Posted January 3, 2022 22 minutes ago, Zambroski said: I love it when vague, general statements are tossed out followed by a refusal to explain and debate them. This is considered “winning” now. ”The vaccine was designed to prevent severe symptoms.” The tenth goalpost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member EvilBird Posted January 3, 2022 Gold Member Share Posted January 3, 2022 1 minute ago, SSFB said: So the government is or isn't forcing Twitter to remove these people, because it sounds like you're arguing both. Our Government like most other Countries Governments 100% works with all Social Media platforms. Pretty obvious. Forcing? Probably not, incentives for pushing an agenda? Absolutely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.