jtssrx Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Lynch: "Partial Transcript" Of Orlando 911 Calls Will Have References To Islamic Terrorism Removed 6.6k Shares Posted By Tim Hains On Date June 19, 2016 Lynch: "Partial Transcript" Of Orlando 911 Calls Will Have References To Islamic Terrorism Removed In an interview with NBC's Chuck Todd, Attorney General Loretta Lynch says that on Monday, the FBI will release edited transcripts of the 911 calls made by the Orlando nightclub shooter to the police during his rampage. "What we're not going to do is further proclaim this man's pledges of allegiance to terrorist groups, and further his propaganda," Lynch said. "We are not going to hear him make his assertions of allegiance [to the Islamic State]."Lynch: References to Islam From Orlando Terrorist 911 Call Removed "To Avoid Revictimizing" The Washington Post reported last week that the gunman made multiple phone calls while holding hostages: "The gunman who opened fire inside a nightclub here said he carried out the attack because he wanted 'Americans to stop bombing his country,' according to a witness who survived the rampage."Salon reported that: “Everybody who was in the bathroom who survived could hear him talking to 911, saying the reason why he’s doing this is because he wanted America to stop bombing his country."The Washington Post also noted that during his 911 call from the club, the gunman referenced the Boston Marathon bombers and claimed "that he carried out the shooting to prevent bombings, [echoing] a message the younger Boston attacker had scrawled in a note before he was taken into custody by police." FBI Director James Comey said at a press conference that the shooter’s past comments about Islamist groups were "inflammatory and contradictory." "We see no clear evidence that he was directed externally," the president added. "It does appear that at the last minute, he announced allegiance to ISIL. But there is no evidence so far that he was in fact directed by ISIL, and at this stage there’s no direct evidence that he was part of a larger plot." ISIL is another name for ISIS, or the Islamic State. Loretta Lynch says the FBI will release: "A printed transcript [that] will begin to capture the back and forth between him and the negotiators." "We're trying to get as much information about this investigation out as possible," she said. Transcript: LORETTA LYNCH: What we're announcing tomorrow is that the FBI is releasing a partial transcript of the killer's calls with law enforcement, from inside the club. These are the calls with the Orlando PD negotiating team, who he was, where he was... that will be coming out tomorrow and I'll be headed to Orlando on Tuesday. CHUCK TODD: Including the hostage negotiation part of this? LYNCH: Yes, it will be primarily a partial transcript of his calls with the hostage negotiators. CHUCK TODD: You say partial, what's being left out? LYNCH: What we're not going to do is further proclaim this man's pledges of allegiance to terrorist groups, and further his propaganda. CHUCK TODD: We're not going to hear him talk about those things? LYNCH: We will hear him talk about some of those things, but we are not going to hear him make his assertions of allegiance and that. It will not be audio, it will be a printed transcript. But it will begin to capture the back and forth between him and the negotiators, we're trying to get as much information about this investigation out as possible. As you know, because the killer is dead, we have a bit more leeway there and we will be producing that information tomorrow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 WTF? That's fucking bullchit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Prolly taking chit out over the retaliation for bombings part more so then the pledge of allegiance to IsIs . Right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 The guy was nuts....nothing more Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 3 minutes ago, f7ben said: The guy was nuts....nothing more You're ok with them taking chit out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 When is a crazed lone gunman gonna go off on Congress? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Capt.Storm said: You're ok with them taking chit out? No...im not......but its so non-consequential and so far down the list of shit that matters i just cant spare any fucks Edited June 20, 2016 by f7ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Just now, f7ben said: No...im not......but its so non-consequential and so far down the list of shit that matters i just cant spare any fucks Really? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 You must be a dem that loves censorship is all I can say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Just now, Capt.Storm said: You must be a dem that loves censorship is all I can say. Wgaf....they knew about this guy and let him do this. Id say likely on purpose. A little censorship doesnt even make the list of fucked up shit concerning this case Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 (edited) 9 minutes ago, f7ben said: Wgaf....they knew about this guy and let him do this. Id say likely on purpose. A little censorship doesnt even make the list of fucked up shit concerning this case On the Bold-So that makes it ok to censor what he said? Like we couldn't handle it? On the red- You gotta be kidding me. Edited June 20, 2016 by Capt.Storm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 (edited) There is so much wrong with this. LYNCH: We will hear him talk about some of those things, but we are not going to hear him make his assertions of allegiance and that. It will not be audio, it will be a printed transcript. But it will begin to capture the back and forth between him and the negotiators, we're trying to get as much information about this investigation out as possible. As you know, because the killer is dead, we have a bit more leeway there and we will be producing that information tomorrow. What the hell does she mean"As you know, because the killer is dead, we have a bit more leeway there " ? Edited June 20, 2016 by Capt.Storm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 (edited) Here is why the dems really want it out. In the ongoing war of words between president Obama on one hand, who has repeatedly said that Orlando shooter Omar Mateen was "self-radicalized" and was not influenced by Islamic elements, and Donald Trump prominently on the other, where the Republican presidential candidate has repeatedly alleged that Mateen's actions were provoked by "radicalized Islam" which has prompted Trump to renew his calls for a temporary ban on Muslim immigrants as well as profiling Muslims already in the US, it appears that the president is about to get some much needed help from none other than the Department of Justice, which will step into the debate, by releasing Mateen's 911 transcripts however only after heavy edits which censor and remove all references to Islamic terrorism. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-19/doj-will-censor-all-references-islamic-terrorism-orlando-911-call-transcripts Edited June 20, 2016 by Capt.Storm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 The FBI also learned that he had traveled to Saudi Arabia in March 2011 to make a pilgrimage and again in March 2012. Comey said the Saudis assisted the FBI investigation but didn’t turn up anything. Didn't turn up anything..that's surprising. Anyways looks to me like had some ties. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/fbi-had-closely-scrutinized-the-orlando-shooter-before-dropping-investigation/2016/06/13/838e9054-3177-11e6-8ff7-7b6c1998b7a0_story.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 It's OK , the gun is the problem, not the ideology of the shooter. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted June 20, 2016 Author Share Posted June 20, 2016 7 hours ago, f7ben said: The guy was nuts....nothing more The guy who walked into church in South Carolina and killed people because they were black was nuts as well. Anyone who kills another person is nuts. However They didnt censor his statements. They also went on to ban the Confederate flag as a result of his actions. Its clear the federal government under Obama has made an effort to try to seperate Islam from these mass shootings. They tried labeling fort hood and San Bernadino work place violence. Why are they doing that? Especially in this case, if you're gay in places like Iran or Saudi Arabia they will put you to death in the name of Islam. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 (edited) I guess Barry figures we will just piss them off more ..and then they will pull more chit..pussy that he is. Edited June 20, 2016 by Capt.Storm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badger** Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Again our government not telling it like it is Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 An angry white home grown American. Classic domestic terrorist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Interesting, After Obama wasted no time condemning his critics on his soft stance of acknowledging radical Islam. With his usual arrogance , he lectured us of how silly it was to focus on labels and words. Most Democrats picked up on this narrative, so it will be interesting hear their thoughts. I don't believe he is worried about offending anyone. The issue is his own personal legacy . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 1 hour ago, jtssrx said: The guy who walked into church in South Carolina and killed people because they were black was nuts as well. Anyone who kills another person is nuts. However They didnt censor his statements. They also went on to ban the Confederate flag as a result of his actions. Its clear the federal government under Obama has made an effort to try to seperate Islam from these mass shootings. They tried labeling fort hood and San Bernadino work place violence. Why are they doing that? Especially in this case, if you're gay in places like Iran or Saudi Arabia they will put you to death in the name of Islam. Why hasn't this been brought up in the media. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 8 minutes ago, racer254 said: Why hasn't this been brought up in the media. whites with God & Guns ...........To be feared. Brown people with Allah & guns ...................misunderstood and unfairly stereotyped. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 (edited) 2 hours ago, Mainecat said: An angry white home grown American. Classic domestic terrorist. They are among us. 2 hours ago, racer254 said: Why hasn't this been brought up in the media. Maybe cause they are dems and they have an agenda?? Edited June 20, 2016 by Capt.Storm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted June 20, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 20, 2016 I'd bet if this involved white racism or bigotry against gays EVERYTHING would be released. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 (edited) I don't know guys. I think it's clear to the people of America with any sort of brain activity what happened, why it happened and who the shooter was representing while doing it. I don't know that giving those sheep rapers continued credit and validation is necessarily a good thing. They love to see their name in lights and it certainly helps attract more retards to their idiocy. But, I also have my doubts that this is what it's all about given our current administrations slight of hand and overall questionably integrity. SO..... Edited June 20, 2016 by Zambroski Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.