Zambroski Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 3 hours ago, 1jkw said: Yes the way you wanted it, I'm sure you were sympathetic to the Hillary supporters claims of fraud too. There will always be some sort of at least attempted voter fraud, people can vote twice, but if you pay attention and know how the system works only 1 vote will count. Study after study by both right and left have concluded that there is no significant voter fraud in national elections, especially in person fraud. Nobody with any brains listened to that wretched lying cunt or like minded supporters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 16 minutes ago, Zambroski said: Nobody with any brains listened to that wretched lying cunt or like minded supporters. True, same same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 4 hours ago, 1jkw said: All that is needed is to take their case to court and prove it, if the Trump campaign had actual proof they could show it in court. Other than swallowing everything you are told that aligns with your beliefs what actual proof do you have that there were 74,000 ballots without proper documentation? In the more than 50 cases why wasn't it brought up? Ah yes, take their case to court......THE DA WON'T PROSECUTE. So even when the case is taken to court nothing happens. Do you understand that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 2 minutes ago, racer254 said: Ah yes, take their case to court......THE DA WON'T PROSECUTE. So even when the case is taken to court nothing happens. Do you understand that? That makes no sense, when was the case taken to court? You need actual proof of wrong doing, DA's turn down cases all the time due to lack of evidence. Had there been all the evidence you seem to think there was, Trump's team would have used it, they didn't need a DA. Again Trump didn't get the percentage of votes in the rural areas he did before and there was zero chance any fraud took place that would help Biden. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 7 hours ago, 1jkw said: That makes no sense, when was the case taken to court? You need actual proof of wrong doing, DA's turn down cases all the time due to lack of evidence. Had there been all the evidence you seem to think there was, Trump's team would have used it, they didn't need a DA. Again Trump didn't get the percentage of votes in the rural areas he did before and there was zero chance any fraud took place that would help Biden. So why would the Dems bail when one item on the bill was a forensic audit. What are they afraid of? https://legiscan.com/TX/text/HB241/id/2423973 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 More. The Dems refusing this? Nothing to see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 9 hours ago, 1jkw said: That makes no sense, when was the case taken to court? You need actual proof of wrong doing, DA's turn down cases all the time due to lack of evidence. Had there been all the evidence you seem to think there was, Trump's team would have used it, they didn't need a DA. Again Trump didn't get the percentage of votes in the rural areas he did before and there was zero chance any fraud took place that would help Biden. Trump received more votes then he had previously even in rural areas. Go look up the numbers yourself. It was the big cities where biden received more votes. You know the places with high population concentration, that makes it easier to put in way more vote numbers with less questions. You don't put in 10 extra votes in polling places with only 1000 people voting. No, you put in 10,000 extra votes in places where there are 100,000 people voting. And how can you even have a case when the DA won't prosecute the actual voting fraud? and thus the continuation of the bullshit narrative that vote fraud doesn't exist. Next time, the liberal shitstains that continually say this will be able to say...."No convictions or arrests were made, so how does voter fraud exist" DERP DERP DERP. Dipshits do this to fuel the narrative, when in all actuality the process is messed up because of the liberal DA's Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 23 minutes ago, racer254 said: Trump received more votes then he had previously even in rural areas. Go look up the numbers yourself. It was the big cities where biden received more votes. You know the places with high population concentration, that makes it easier to put in way more vote numbers with less questions. You don't put in 10 extra votes in polling places with only 1000 people voting. No, you put in 10,000 extra votes in places where there are 100,000 people voting. And how can you even have a case when the DA won't prosecute the actual voting fraud? and thus the continuation of the bullshit narrative that vote fraud doesn't exist. Next time, the liberal shitstains that continually say this will be able to say...."No convictions or arrests were made, so how does voter fraud exist" DERP DERP DERP. Dipshits do this to fuel the narrative, when in all actuality the process is messed up because of the liberal DA's Yes he did I know that and stated that, he didn't get the PERCENTAGE of the vote in the rural and suburban counties to overcome the large city votes. This was predicted by the guy who has correctly predicted the presidential winner for decades. The Trump campaign can take this to court, like they have 60 times before, you don't need a DA. The reason Trump's lawyers didn't present it in court is you need proof, evidence, not just made up shit that you chose to believe. No one is saying fraud doesn't exist, it always has and likely always will, it doesn't exist in a high enough level to change the outcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 2 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said: More. The Dems refusing this? Nothing to see. They should audit the whole state, it's farm more likely that the people that drive around with flags in the back of their trucks, camp out and stand in line for hours at rallies, and even were willing to break in the capitol, would commit voter fraud. The audit will prove Trump won Texas again just like it will prove Biden won Arizona. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 4 minutes ago, 1jkw said: Yes he did I know that and stated that, he didn't get the PERCENTAGE of the vote in the rural and suburban counties to overcome the large city votes. This was predicted by the guy who has correctly predicted the presidential winner for decades. The Trump campaign can take this to court, like they have 60 times before, you don't need a DA. The reason Trump's lawyers didn't present it in court is you need proof, evidence, not just made up shit that you chose to believe. No one is saying fraud doesn't exist, it always has and likely always will, it doesn't exist in a high enough level to change the outcome. The more DA's let this go, the smaller the number of cases, thus making fraud seem LESS than there actually are. That is a problem in itself. It only takes 50k votes to change this election. That isn't that many, and if AZ actually had 74k of ballots that can't actually be tracked, then there is a problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 1 minute ago, racer254 said: The more DA's let this go, the smaller the number of cases, thus making fraud seem LESS than there actually are. That is a problem in itself. It only takes 50k votes to change this election. That isn't that many, and if AZ actually had 74k of ballots that can't actually be tracked, then there is a problem. Your last sentence says all you need to know "IF AZ. ACTUALLY HAD 74K BALLOTS" IF the Trump campaign had "proof" those ballots existed they would have presented it in their court cases, they didn't because it doesn't exist, it's just more bullshit to keep the base riled up. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 Other than the mail in ballots that the cyber ninjas need to go back and talk to actual voters about (that they’re just requesting last minute) what else did they find, sharpies, bamboo, etc? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 4 minutes ago, akvanden said: Other than the mail in ballots that the cyber ninjas need to go back and talk to actual voters about (that they’re just requesting last minute) what else did they find, sharpies, bamboo, etc? It is nice to see that you add NOTHING with this post. If you have to ask this question again, then you should go back and read all 10 pages of this thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 13 minutes ago, racer254 said: It is nice to see that you add NOTHING with this post. If you have to ask this question again, then you should go back and read all 10 pages of this thread. The point is that you claiming issues that turn out not to be issues, even with partisan audits. And now that they haven’t found anything, we need more audits, still yet without any evidence. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 (edited) 6 minutes ago, akvanden said: The point is that you claiming issues that turn out not to be issues, even with partisan audits. And now that they haven’t found anything, we need more audits, still yet without any evidence. Yeah, I am not claiming anything. I am pointing out the fact that there are DA's that won't prosecute actual voter fraud, I am also saying that there are absentee ballots in AZ that had no record of being sent out but were processed and counted. There is also the fact that there was election integrity issues in Wisconsin. Edited July 20, 2021 by racer254 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 1 hour ago, akvanden said: Other than the mail in ballots that the cyber ninjas need to go back and talk to actual voters about (that they’re just requesting last minute) what else did they find, sharpies, bamboo, etc? Deleted databases after subpoenas, missing passwords, etc etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 1 hour ago, racer254 said: It is nice to see that you add NOTHING with this post. If you have to ask this question again, then you should go back and read all 10 pages of this thread. He's filling in well in Snowriders absence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 3 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Deleted databases after subpoenas, missing passwords, etc etc. Yeah, they backtracked that deleted database claim, didn't they. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 1 hour ago, akvanden said: Yeah, they backtracked that deleted database claim, didn't they. They are now lawyering up. Why would they need to? What backtrack on the dB, it was recovered. That what forensic experts do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 6 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: They are now lawyering up. Why would they need to? What backtrack on the dB, it was recovered. That what forensic experts do. Because it's going to be a big game of he-said/she-said, as example by the database. So then the courts will get involved, and then when all is said and done, it will be like the other 60+ lawsuits that were thrown out because seemingly so many people are unable to grasp the legal term "meritless." And then the journey will continue, down conspiracy road. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 The fact that you are all arguing this voter fraud allegation, day after day, proves that Trump knew exactly what he was doing, by making that claim. The election is so complex, and huge, you can litigate it FOREVER!!! Trump has been involved in 4000 civil suits................LITIGATION is his middle name. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CFM Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 Think about this Clown 550 titled: Clown World Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
airflite1 Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 1 hour ago, akvanden said: Yeah, they backtracked that deleted database claim, didn't they. No the didn't https://www.westernjournal.com/az-auditors-really-backtrack-claim-files-deleted-ap-reported/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 5 minutes ago, airflite1 said: No the didn't https://www.westernjournal.com/az-auditors-really-backtrack-claim-files-deleted-ap-reported/ Good thing they remotely un-deleted them the day before then in the letter they sent detailing where it was. "The Western Journal, previously known as Western Journalism, is an American conservative news and political website based in Phoenix, Arizona. The site was founded by political consultant Floyd Brown in 2008. Wikipedia" They even have a "Media Watch" section. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 57 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: They are now lawyering up. Why would they need to? What backtrack on the dB, it was recovered. That what forensic experts do. Because anybody who represents themselves in a legal dispute has an idiot for a client. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.