04nightfire Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/belanger-o-canada-gender-lyrics-bill-1.3636348 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 Is that good or bad? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 is this for real? What was gender specific in it? Sweet fancy moses already! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Zambroski said: is this for real? What was gender specific in it? Sweet fancy moses already! Man you gotta start reading better..was right at the start even..lol. Dying Liberal MP Mauril Belanger's private member's bill to make the national anthem more gender neutral cleared its final hurdle in the House of Commons today, passing by a vote of 225 to 74. Bill C-210, which would change the second line of the anthem from "in all thy sons command" to "in all of us command," will now go to the Senate. Bélanger was in the House for the vote. Edited June 16, 2016 by Capt.Storm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 (edited) HCS is all fawked up..mods and even admins can't get in tonight. Edited June 16, 2016 by Capt.Storm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snopro31 Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 they pass that bill yet they vote down a bill that would link organ donors with people that need organs. go liberals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 5 minutes ago, snopro31 said: they pass that bill yet they vote down a bill that would link organ donors with people that need organs. go liberals. So it's not a good thing then..I been waiting for clarification now for freakin hours.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 (edited) BTW..how do the people hook up then if there is no link? Man you Canadians are vague. Edited June 16, 2016 by Capt.Storm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snopro31 Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 7 minutes ago, Capt.Storm said: BTW..how do the people hook up then if there is no link? Man you Canadians are vague. There are lists but not a national registry. This government cant make difficult decisions so they make knee jerk rainbow decisions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ebsell Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 1 hour ago, Capt.Storm said: Is that good or bad? It's just stupid and pandering to a select vocal few. It's the liberal way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 3 minutes ago, snopro31 said: There are lists but not a national registry. This government cant make difficult decisions so they make knee jerk rainbow decisions. Well I could use a set of lungs so try and hook me hook up there will ya? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 (edited) 1 minute ago, Ebsell said: It's just stupid and pandering to a select vocal few. It's the liberal way Gotta give the guy his dying wish though right? Edited June 16, 2016 by Capt.Storm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ebsell Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 Just now, Capt.Storm said: Gotta give the guy is dying wish though right? In the words of my late father. Fuck him lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 25 minutes ago, snopro31 said: they pass that bill yet they vote down a bill that would link organ donors with people that need organs. go liberals. Won't say that ISIS is committing genocide Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 (edited) 36 minutes ago, Momorider said: Won't say that ISIS is committing genocide . Edited June 16, 2016 by Capt.Storm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 Our PM. I know its fake but funny. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted June 16, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 16, 2016 What are the negatives to the proposed change? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snatchslayer Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 3 minutes ago, SnowRider said: What are the negatives to the proposed change? Why change it? Pretty soon we will all be sharing one bathroom. Fuckin hosers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted June 16, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 16, 2016 1 minute ago, xcr700 said: Why change it? Pretty soon we will all be sharing one bathroom. Fuckin hosers Why not? Times change and what's wrong with being more inclusive.....including women with a simple change to the lyrics. Seems like a no brainer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snatchslayer Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 2 minutes ago, SnowRider said: Why not? Times change and what's wrong with being more inclusive.....including women with a simple change to the lyrics. Seems like a no brainer Where do you stop ? Change the national anthem ,then change the flag ,then change name of the country. Once one thing is done,I'm sure it'll be nothing but changes . Nothing wrong with the way it is,just leave the original alone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delgaty Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 I don't know old English but I don't think "in all of us command" makes grammatical sense. "In all of our command" makes more sense. People will still sing it the old way too. Some people may not even stand apparently too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 19 minutes ago, SnowRider said: What are the negatives to the proposed change? Are women offended by the current anthem? Just another useless proposal by LefTards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted June 16, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 16, 2016 3 minutes ago, xcr700 said: Where do you stop ? Change the national anthem ,then change the flag ,then change name of the country. Once one thing is done,I'm sure it'll be nothing but changes . Nothing wrong with the way it is,just leave the original alone. similar mentality that gay marriage will lead to the rape of children and marrying your pets.. Has that happened? Why would the flag change? Admit it - you're opposed because the libs proposed it and you're a crotchety conservative who fears change Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted June 16, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 16, 2016 1 minute ago, ArcticCrusher said: Are women offended by the current anthem? Just another useless proposal by LefTards. Just now, SnowRider said: similar mentality that gay marriage will lead to the rape of children and marrying your pets.. Has that happened? Why would the flag change? Admit it - you're opposed because the libs proposed it and you're a crotchety conservative who fears change Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 19 minutes ago, SnowRider said: What are the negatives to the proposed change? It simply doesn't need change. Been this way since it was written. Change for the sake of change is stupid. Change for the better is worthwhile but this doesn't make it better. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.