Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

H.R. 127


Snake

Recommended Posts

  • Platinum Contributing Member

 

$75,000-$150,000 fine and 15 to 25 years in prison for have an unregistered firearm.  :lol:  

 

 PENALTIES.—Section 924(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(8) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(aa) shall be fined not less than $75,000 and not more than $150,000, imprisoned not less than 15 years and not more than 25 years, or both.

“(9) (A) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(bb)(1) shall be fined not less than $50,000 and not more than $75,000, imprisoned not less than 10 years and not more than 15 years, or both.

“(B) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(bb)(2) shall be fined not less than $30,000 and not more than $50,000, imprisoned not less than 5 years and not more than 10 years, or both.

“(C) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(bb)(3) shall be fined not less than $5,000 and not more than $10,000.

“(D) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(bb)(4) shall be fined not less than $75,000 and not more than $100,000, imprisoned not less than 15 years and not more than 25 years, or both, except that if the transferee of the firearm possess or uses the firearm during or in relation to a crime, an unintentional shooting, or suicide, the transferor shall be fined not less than $100,000 and not more than $150,000, imprisoned not less than 25 years and not more than 40 years, or both.

“(10) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(cc) shall be fined not less than $50,000 and not more than $100,000, imprisoned not less than 10 years and not more than 20 years, or both.”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Highmark said:

 

$75,000-$150,000 fine and 15 to 25 years in prison for have an unregistered firearm.  :lol:  

 

 PENALTIES.—Section 924(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following:

 

“(8) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(aa) shall be fined not less than $75,000 and not more than $150,000, imprisoned not less than 15 years and not more than 25 years, or both.

 

“(9) (A) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(bb)(1) shall be fined not less than $50,000 and not more than $75,000, imprisoned not less than 10 years and not more than 15 years, or both.

“(B) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(bb)(2) shall be fined not less than $30,000 and not more than $50,000, imprisoned not less than 5 years and not more than 10 years, or both.

 

“(C) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(bb)(3) shall be fined not less than $5,000 and not more than $10,000.

 

“(D) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(bb)(4) shall be fined not less than $75,000 and not more than $100,000, imprisoned not less than 15 years and not more than 25 years, or both, except that if the transferee of the firearm possess or uses the firearm during or in relation to a crime, an unintentional shooting, or suicide, the transferor shall be fined not less than $100,000 and not more than $150,000, imprisoned not less than 25 years and not more than 40 years, or both.

 

“(10) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(cc) shall be fined not less than $50,000 and not more than $100,000, imprisoned not less than 10 years and not more than 20 years, or both.”.

Oh, I can't wait for this!  :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
8 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

Oh, I can't wait for this!  :lol: 

Can you imagine if that went thru and they tried to enforce it?   It would not be good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Highmark said:

Can you imagine if that went thru and they tried to enforce it?   It would not be good. 

I'd love to see this somehow get forced through...then let the left try to find enough of those that don't want to live to go out and enforce it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
13 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

I'd love to see this somehow get forced through...then let the left try to find enough of those that don't want to live to go out and enforce it.

 

I think in some jurisdictions the police would try and enforce it and lots on both sides would die.  The question would be then what next from the govt.   What would they do?   

Reality is this.   It would take a while before anything was done because an injunction would immediately be put in place by some district court then the SC would likely rule it unconstitutional.  Its clear now they make rulings on trying to avoid violent reaction in this country and I think they would be well aware of where this would take us.....not to mention its highly unconstitutional and even without Roberts would be shot down.   The question is would it be granted a writ of Certiorari.    

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Highmark said:

I think in some jurisdictions the police would try and enforce it and lots on both sides would die.  The question would be then what next from the govt.   What would they do?   

Reality is this.   It would take a while before anything was done because an injunction would immediately be put in place by some district court then the SC would likely rule it unconstitutional.  Its clear now they make rulings on trying to avoid violent reaction in this country and I think they would be well aware of where this would take us.....not to mention its highly unconstitutional and even without Roberts would be shot down.   The question is would it be granted a writ of Certiorari.    

Most police won't want anything to do with this but, you're right...maybe in some districts.  From a national standpoint, it would take military action to accomplish.  This won't be enforced by our military either.  Obama did all he could to try and rid our military of patriots and those who swore an oath "all enemies foreign AND DOMESTIC".  He failed.  Biden will certainly fail.

Now, the writ path?  Maybe.  I doubt it will get that far.  This is such a reach it's just laughable.  Only fools (liberals) think this is at all achievable and will stroke each other over Biden's term thinking it is.  Anything remotely close to getting this achieved will turn the streets red.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Skidooski said:

My Covid results just came in... Negative. I guess I'm the only one with a tradition cold/flu

 

Have it checked again, I'll probably come back positive, that's happened to so many I know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
14 minutes ago, XCR1250 said:

 

Have it checked again, I'll probably come back positive, that's happened to so many I know.

I will if I don't get better or start to feel worse in the next little bit

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Skidooski said:

I will if I don't get better or start to feel worse in the next little bit

Wife's daughter in law is an RN at a hospital, she said they have had both negative and positives from the same person in the same day, even when they check their employees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...