jtssrx Posted November 20, 2016 Share Posted November 20, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Rosenberg Posted November 20, 2016 Share Posted November 20, 2016 Who cares what those soreasses think Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01mxz800 Posted November 20, 2016 Share Posted November 20, 2016 schumer is a fucking asshole but I'am sure MC and blowrider will applaud his actions Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted November 20, 2016 Share Posted November 20, 2016 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 I hope he does. The country does not need more republican ideas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 33 minutes ago, Mainecat said: I hope he does. The country does not need more republican ideas. Hypocrite, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted November 21, 2016 Author Share Posted November 21, 2016 2 hours ago, Mainecat said: I hope he does. The country does not need more republican ideas. This is why you have zero credibility. You cried fir years about the party of no. Here you have s chance to say the same and you applaud it. What a faggot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 (edited) 9 hours ago, jtssrx said: This is why you have zero credibility. You cried fir years about the party of no. Here you have s chance to say the same and you applaud it. What a faggot Thats because I support Dodd Frank you imbecile. He also has Republican votes you dumb ass. Also if you come here for credibility I feel sad for you Edited November 21, 2016 by Mainecat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 Thanks to Harry Reid, Schumer's power in the Senate will be limited. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 56 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Thats because I support Dodd Frank you imbecile. He also has Republican votes you dumb ass. Also if you come here for credibility I feel sad for you I honestly believe he doesn't know the scope of the topic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 24 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: I honestly believe he doesn't know the scope of the topic He clueless Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 17 minutes ago, Mainecat said: He clueless LOL! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 2 hours ago, Mainecat said: Thats because I support Dodd Frank you imbecile. He also has Republican votes you dumb ass. Also if you come here for credibility I feel sad for you What exactly do you support about dodd frank? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hwytohell Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 dembankster , wall street purchased and owned chuck schumer, a carrier of looking out for the little guy an spewing bald face lies for the camera. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 10 hours ago, Momorider said: Hey...another job created by the Obama administration...now hiring! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 2 hours ago, Mainecat said: Thats because I support Dodd Frank you imbecile. He also has Republican votes you dumb ass. Also if you come here for credibility I feel sad for you Holy shit. But...I'm not surprised. 14 minutes ago, racer254 said: What exactly do you support about dodd frank? He doesn't know. He was told he is supposed to support it. Let him google his talking points about it and he'll get back to you. THE WORSE PIECE OF LEGISLATION TO EVER HIT PRIVATE BUSINESS. Well, in America anyway. I think we'd have to hit the communist countries to find worse (or equal). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Zambroski said: Holy shit. But...I'm not surprised. He doesn't know. He was told he is supposed to support it. Let him google his talking points about it and he'll get back to you. THE WORSE PIECE OF LEGISLATION TO EVER HIT PRIVATE BUSINESS. Well, in America anyway. I think we'd have to hit the communist countries to find worse (or equal). I have spoken out many times on the issue before, especially during the Bush fail years when you all were apparently sleeping. Edited November 21, 2016 by Mainecat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 Just now, Mainecat said: I have spoken out many times on the issue before, especially during the Bush fail years when you all were apparently sleeping. Please share again. Just a few points. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 11 minutes ago, Zambroski said: Please share again. Just a few points. Thank you. Transparency? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 Just now, Mainecat said: Transparency? Transparency laws are and have been in place to ensure that too much "fuckery" isn't taking place already. Full transparency is interfering with trade secrets and usurping corporate enterprise. Something that is a big fat NO-NO for government. Next? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 Just now, Zambroski said: Transparency laws are and have been in place to ensure that too much "fuckery" isn't taking place already. Full transparency is interfering with trade secrets and usurping corporate enterprise. Something that is a big fat NO-NO for government. Next? Not when you want to remove Dodd Frank....transparency is a huge factor of Dodd Frank. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 Just now, Mainecat said: Not when you want to remove Dodd Frank....transparency is a huge factor of Dodd Frank. It is...but like I said, it's too much government control and stifling private enterprise. There were enough "controls" before. Dodd-Frank is a wall for growth...to be lowered and raised at the governments pleasure. It's why our growth in the last 8 has been comparably stagnate. And I don't give a fuck what the MSM is lying about to help their idiot king. The numbers are there for people adept at reading economic signals. Simply put...look at our prime interest rate trends over the last eight years. No growth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 1 hour ago, Mainecat said: Not when you want to remove Dodd Frank....transparency is a huge factor of Dodd Frank. horseshit, working in an industry regulated under DF I will say the fact that the regulatory bodies refuse to give black and white answers is maddening and continues to drive up consumer costs. Regulations were needed but like most bills passed under the current administration poorly thought out and executed but no shocker given warrens involvement in the regulatory end since she doesn't know shit about how things actually work, For as much as we like to bitch about insdiers in this country reality is you have to have some experience inside to be bale to actually design regulations that effect the real problems, academics never do this well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.