Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 22, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 22, 2020 (edited) She might actually have a case here. Definitely will set some precedent in political races if it goes thru in some manner. On the surface it makes Gabbard seem a little thin skinned but its against Hillary so I'm all for it. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gabbard-hits-clinton-with-50-million-defamation-lawsuit-over-russian-asset-remarks Edited January 22, 2020 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 Can you imagine if Hillary got $50 million every time someone defamed her???? She'd be richer than Putin, yo! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 Not at all, this is clearly dafammation and such rumors could have serious consequences on her political career. This is how you shut people up. Good on her. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 22, 2020 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 22, 2020 3 minutes ago, Anler said: Not at all, this is clearly dafammation and such rumors could have serious consequences on her political career. This is how you shut people up. Good on her. Begs the question what is Trump owed for Hillary's team putting together and disseminating the dossier? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 3 minutes ago, Highmark said: Begs the question what is Trump owed for Hillary's team putting together and disseminating the dossier? Notice how Trump hasnt pursued it? And Trump sues everybody... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 22, 2020 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 22, 2020 1 minute ago, Anler said: Notice how Trump hasnt pursued it? And Trump sues everybody... Are you implying he hasn't because its true? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dz246 Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 This is awesome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 1 minute ago, Highmark said: Are you implying he hasn't because its true? Im implying that it might not be provable. Otherwise why wouldnt he? Are you implying that he would not fight back against people who were fabricating evidence that could have him criminally charged? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 22, 2020 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 22, 2020 1 minute ago, Anler said: Im implying that it might not be provable. Otherwise why wouldnt he? Are you implying that he would not fight back against people who were fabricating evidence that could have him criminally charged? I agree. Hard to prove something never happened. His legal team might simply be saying there is no case. The Clinton's were also not stupid, they layered that to protect themselves as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 She was so young and so bright......just to throw it all away by suicide. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 7 minutes ago, Highmark said: I agree. Hard to prove something never happened. His legal team might simply be saying there is no case. The Clinton's were also not stupid, they layered that to protect themselves as well. It's also hard to prove Hillary was even talking about Tulsi though isn't it? I thought, and I could be wrong, but didn't she only say, "someone". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 From the story.... Clinton did not specifically name Gabbard in her remarks, but strongly implied she was referring to her. The complaint points out that when asked if she was referring to Gabbard, Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill responded, "If the nesting doll fits," a reference to Russian dolls. Gabbard won’t get a dime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 22, 2020 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 22, 2020 9 minutes ago, XC.Morrison said: It's also hard to prove Hillary was even talking about Tulsi though isn't it? I thought, and I could be wrong, but didn't she only say, "someone". Well she outwardly called Jill Stein a Russian asset and mentioned it being a woman in the current field. Its pretty clear she was referring to someone specifically and she could be asked that in a civil deposition. She better start coming up with a clear answer. Then the other person would have a case. Its pretty clear she meant Gabbard. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/10/18/hillary_clinton_calls_jill_stein_a_russian_asset_implies_gabbard_is_being_groomed_by_russians.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted January 22, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 22, 2020 Fighting within the Dem party...I love it! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 22, 2020 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 22, 2020 7 minutes ago, Mainecat said: From the story.... Clinton did not specifically name Gabbard in her remarks, but strongly implied she was referring to her. The complaint points out that when asked if she was referring to Gabbard, Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill responded, "If the nesting doll fits," a reference to Russian dolls. Gabbard won’t get a dime. Wouldn't be so sure about that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 Honestly, this isn’t much more than two women just keeping their names alive in the press and trying to remain relevant....it’s just that only one has a possible future. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 16 minutes ago, XC.Morrison said: It's also hard to prove Hillary was even talking about Tulsi though isn't it? I thought, and I could be wrong, but didn't she only say, "someone". Hillary is a cunt, she was talking about her and she just said nobody likes Bernie. Ignoring the fact that his rallies drew tens of thousands of people and hers drew like dozens of people. In comparison Id say nobody like Hillary and Hillary is a Russian asset... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinker Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 9 minutes ago, Mainecat said: From the story.... Clinton did not specifically name Gabbard in her remarks, but strongly implied she was referring to her. The complaint points out that when asked if she was referring to Gabbard, Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill responded, "If the nesting doll fits," a reference to Russian dolls. Gabbard won’t get a dime. Prediction # 114... Lookin like Gabbard gets 50 mil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 1 minute ago, Highmark said: Well she outwardly called Jill Stein a Russian asset and mentioned it being a woman in the current field. Its pretty clear she was referring to someone specifically and she could be asked that in a civil deposition. She better start coming up with a clear answer. Then the other person would have a case. Its pretty clear she meant Gabbard. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/10/18/hillary_clinton_calls_jill_stein_a_russian_asset_implies_gabbard_is_being_groomed_by_russians.html This all seems about as silly as the time Trump sued Bill Maher because Maher had offered him like $5 million if he could prove that he was not in fact the son of an orangutan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted January 22, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 22, 2020 Fuck Yeah Tulsi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 22, 2020 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 22, 2020 Just now, XC.Morrison said: This all seems about as silly as the time Trump sued Bill Maher because Maher had offered him like $5 million if he could prove that he was not in fact the son of an orangutan. I'd say its a lot different than that. Maher's was obviously in jest.....Clinton was serious as a heart attack. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 1 minute ago, Highmark said: I'd say its a lot different than that. Maher's was obviously in jest.....Clinton was serious as a heart attack. “....but the nightly comedy show guys and gals say......” Amazing that’s where some draw their information and news. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 Women always stab each other in the back. It’s in their nature. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted January 22, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 22, 2020 A lot of people listen to and believe that old fucking hag...her comments definitely damaged Gabbards reputation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.