Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 22, 2020 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 22, 2020 (edited) 1 minute ago, steve from amherst said: Of course he is. Why do you think Pelosi held up sending the impeachment to the senate? It was to keep Bernie and Warren out of Iowa at the right time. That's part of what I was referring to. That and Clinton going on the attack as well. They will only attack Warren so much as she might be Biden's VP choice. Satisfy the moderates and the left wing nut bags. Edited January 22, 2020 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 21 minutes ago, Zambroski said: She should! And all she has to do to win is prove that his post created monetary or mental damages for her. Are some of you new at life? I think Gabbard may have a case here. I think Trump and many R’s most CERTAINLY have case(s) they’d win against the media too. I hope we start to see more of them. I've been called a libtard many times which has resulted in chronic TDS. I can haz monies now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted January 22, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 22, 2020 1 hour ago, XC.Morrison said: I've been called a libtard many times which has resulted in chronic TDS. I can haz monies now No, it's true. So therefore no case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 24 minutes ago, steve from amherst said: No, it's true. So therefore no case. Thank you for tip. Easier to prove that I am not a flake of snow. I'll call Neil deGrasse Tyson to the stand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 The witch went down in flames before and round 2 is on its way. I hope she gets raked over the coals and just maybe she’ll go away and shrivel up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 Someone has to prove damages to win a case like this Since Trump won the election it would be tough to prove Clinton and the DNC lies about him actually hurt him. It's going to be ear impossible to prove that Gabbard was hurt by Clinton's comments here as well. This type of shit is a dream for Lawyers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 3 hours ago, XC.Morrison said: I've been called a libtard many times which has resulted in chronic TDS. I can haz monies now Well, pretty sure I never called you that. Honestly, I kinda like your style. Good humor and short on repugnance. A good mix. And no,. No money! TDS is self inflicted. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted January 23, 2020 Share Posted January 23, 2020 8 hours ago, Mainecat said: From the story.... Clinton did not specifically name Gabbard in her remarks, but strongly implied she was referring to her. The complaint points out that when asked if she was referring to Gabbard, Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill responded, "If the nesting doll fits," a reference to Russian dolls. Gabbard won’t get a dime. so torn your queen or a lefty who will be a strong contender for the WH some day .man this is real conundrum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted January 23, 2020 Share Posted January 23, 2020 Hey, did you guys hear that she was in the military? “The 14-page brief crams in 13 references to Gabbard’s service in the Army National Guard.” https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/605374/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 23, 2020 Share Posted January 23, 2020 17 minutes ago, XC.Morrison said: Hey, did you guys hear that she was in the military? “The 14-page brief crams in 13 references to Gabbard’s service in the Army National Guard.” https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/605374/ She’s so gross sometimes. Just shameless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted January 23, 2020 Share Posted January 23, 2020 1 hour ago, Zambroski said: She’s so gross sometimes. Just shameless. Yup Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.