Rod Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 hour ago, Zambroski said: NEAL WANTS PROTOCOL FOLLOWED!!!!!! (Psst...there really is none for this). What is protocol for a coup? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 2 hours ago, Carlos Danger said: I see many fall into this trap. The president is under no obligation to use only channels controls by the state department. I can't think of a president who has not had some sort of back channel communications during their presidency going back as far as the founding of the country. It's not a trap, it's back channel hiding bullshit. It only makes Trump look guilty as fuck. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 5 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: It's not a trap, it's back channel hiding bullshit. It only makes Trump look guilty as fuck. Neal You didn’t sign up for his foreign relations/strategy with the Ukraine update email list? That seems kind of reckless on your part. 8 minutes ago, 168hp CAT 800 said: What is protocol for a coup? Well, the Dems have one for a complete failure of a coup and decimation of their own party. So far, they are 100% by the book and its working like a charm! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 15 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: It's not a trap, it's back channel hiding bullshit. It only makes Trump look guilty as fuck. Neal Guilty of what Neil? I think TDS has blinded many in here. This whole thing sets a bad president for the future. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 I bet Sonlands call to trump asking for clear direction from trump was a setup that backfired 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted November 21, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 21, 2019 20 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: It's not a trap, it's back channel hiding bullshit. It only makes Trump look guilty as fuck. Neal He is a "private citizen" who is not subject to any oversight or ethics standards working on behalf of The President implementing foreign policy in a country where he has substantial business dealings yet the partisan hacks see nothing wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted November 21, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 21, 2019 5 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said: Guilty of what Neil? I think TDS has blinded many in here. This whole thing sets a bad president for the future. Just now, Jimmy Snacks said: He is a "private citizen" who is not subject to any oversight or ethics standards working on behalf of The President implementing foreign policy in a country where he has substantial business dealings yet the partisan hacks see nothing wrong. Open your eyes Carl ffs and the word is precedent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 6 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said: Guilty of what Neil? I think TDS has blinded many in here. This whole thing sets a bad president for the future. He’s just guilty ok?,?,??!!!!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 11 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Open your eyes Carl ffs and the word is precedent. Sorry Jimmy I am on my phone and my eyes are not what used to be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 10 hours ago, Mainecat said: Watch for Trump to site health issues as he walks away from his presidency. care to put 500 on that sure thing? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted November 21, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 hour ago, 168hp CAT 800 said: I bet Sonlands call to trump asking for clear direction from trump was a setup that backfired Yep. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted November 21, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 21, 2019 (edited) Edited November 21, 2019 by Highmark 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, Carlos Danger said: Guilty of what Neil? I think TDS has blinded many in here. This whole thing sets a bad president for the future. Soliciting foreign election interference. Perhaps, but the level of assumed TDS doesn't change what happened, this is something that needs to be aired out. Setting a precedent for withholding foreign aid for election mucking is also bad to let slide, do you not agree? Neal Edited November 21, 2019 by NaturallyAspirated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 2 hours ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Open your eyes Carl ffs and the word is precedent. Haha hey I read his post and wrote the same. Edited my grammar above. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 2 hours ago, Jimmy Snacks said: He is a "private citizen" who is not subject to any oversight or ethics standards working on behalf of The President implementing foreign policy in a country where he has substantial business dealings yet the partisan hacks see nothing wrong. This. There is no reason for Rudy to be involved with this in a non-government capacity. Christ I remember the right getting flustered by members of Congress talking to foreign leaders... Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 minute ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Soliciting foreign election interference. Perhaps, but the level of assumed TDS doesn't change what happened, this is something that needs to be aired out. Setting a precedent for withholding foreign aid for election mucking is also bad to let slide, do you not agree? Neal You may want to pump the brakes on that one Neil until after the IG report is out. And the second bold? what about Biden/Obama did they not out right threaten to with hold aid if they did not get what they wanted from the Ukrainian president? Let's be clear as it sits now there is no case against Trump but I think you could make a convincing opening argument on Biden. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted November 21, 2019 Author Share Posted November 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: This. There is no reason for Rudy to be involved with this in a non-government capacity. Christ I remember the right getting flustered by members of Congress talking to foreign leaders... Neal Not to mention Sondland after paying Trump a million to be EU ambassador tries to arrange the quid pro quo for Trump. There is no doubt Trump is guilty. There is even less doubt that his fans are dumb as shit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted November 21, 2019 Author Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 minute ago, Carlos Danger said: You may want to pump the brakes on that one Neil until after the IG report is out. And the second bold? what about Biden/Obama did they not out right threaten to with hold aid if they did not get what they wanted from the Ukrainian president? Let's be clear as it sits now there is no case against Trump but I think you could make a convincing opening argument on Biden. You're the dumb cunt that thinks Trump is a choir boy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 minute ago, revkevsdi said: You're the dumb cunt that thinks Trump is a choir boy. So after 3 + years of continuous investigations and countless accusations you have what exactly? Think any of the ten or eleven dwarfs at the DNC debate tonight could withstand what has been thrown at Trump? A shopping cart with a broken wheel shows more independent thought than you have displayed. 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 6 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said: You may want to pump the brakes on that one Neil until after the IG report is out. And the second bold? what about Biden/Obama did they not out right threaten to with hold aid if they did not get what they wanted from the Ukrainian president? Let's be clear as it sits now there is no case against Trump but I think you could make a convincing opening argument on Biden. Just as you may want to on TDS. Tit/tat. I don't know, Obama/Biden testimony is not happening at present. There is the same, if not moreso a case against Trump than Biden. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 9 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Just as you may want to on TDS. Tit/tat. I don't know, Obama/Biden testimony is not happening at present. There is the same, if not moreso a case against Trump than Biden. Neal Yea I am not buying the case that there is a better case against Trump at this point as none of this testimony has revealed a smoking gun and Biden has many questions to answer. Side Note: is Sondland really our ambassador to the EU because he does seem to be a little absent minded professor for my taste. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 25 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: This. There is no reason for Rudy to be involved with this in a non-government capacity. Christ I remember the right getting flustered by members of Congress talking to foreign leaders... Neal A president cannot have a personal emissary? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted November 21, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 21, 2019 3 hours ago, Jimmy Snacks said: He is a "private citizen" who is not subject to any oversight or ethics standards working on behalf of The President implementing foreign policy in a country where he has substantial business dealings yet the partisan hacks see nothing wrong. You mean like Obama's FBI and Hillary did? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted November 21, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 21, 2019 27 minutes ago, Highmark said: You mean like Obama's FBI and Hillary did? What do you mean Obamas FBI....FBI Agents are subject to eversight and under the federal purview and not private citizens like Rudy. If I'm off base clarify what you are asking me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 10 hours ago, 168hp CAT 800 said: He’s just guilty ok?,?,??!!!!! Nailed it. I’d have added “please” to the end. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.