revkevsdi Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 5 minutes ago, Cold War said: Can you imagine lapping this up? 2 minutes ago, steve from amherst said: So where do they keep this free money ? I want to go get some Did either of you read the article? What part of their research did you find lacking? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted July 24, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, revkevsdi said: Did either of you read the article? What part of their research did you find lacking? You try so hard..good god its pathetic... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted July 24, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, revkevsdi said: Did either of you read the article? What part of their research did you find lacking? The part that was left out. Where 15000 people died because they were too stupid to go to the hospital when they were sick. Article also left out Where the free money magically appeared from Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 The research. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 59 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: It really pissed you off when someone posts from sources that get high ratings for factual reporting. Poor snowflake. You mean like the “high factual reporting”that verifies that 15k died because R governors wanted to stick it to Obama? That kind of factual reporting? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 8 minutes ago, Rigid1 said: You try so hard..good god its pathetic... 6 minutes ago, steve from amherst said: The part that was left out. Where 15000 people died because they were too stupid to go to the hospital when they were sick. Article also left out Where the free money magically appeared from Just now, Cold War said: The research. Two deflections and a misrepresentation of the research. I don’t think any of you read it This is research from a least biased source with a high factual reporting history Why are you afraid of reading it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 4 minutes ago, Cold War said: The research. The indictments are coming for these Republicans that killed of these 15,000 people to out of spite for Obama. Its all in the Mueller report! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, Zambroski said: You mean like the “high factual reporting”that verifies that 15k died because R governors wanted to stick it to Obama? That kind of factual reporting? Fresh from his beating yesterday, I’d like to welcome Zambo the clown. He’s here for comic relief and to prove he can make stupid comments about any topic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, revkevsdi said: Fresh from his beating yesterday, I’d like to welcome Zambo the clown. He’s here for comic relief and to prove he can make stupid comments about any topic. Beating? Poor BarbieHands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted July 24, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 24, 2019 1 minute ago, revkevsdi said: Two deflections and a misrepresentation of the research. I don’t think any of you read it This is research from a least biased source with a high factual reporting history Why are you afraid of reading it? Why do you care if we read it?? I read it and dont care.. whoopty fucking do Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, Rigid1 said: Why do you care if we read it?? I read it and dont care.. whoopty fucking do No, you are afraid!!! Snowflake and TDS and I’m rubber your glue and I know you are but what am I and..... He’s in his mid 50’s. I still can’t believe it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, Rigid1 said: Why do you care if we read it?? I read it and dont care.. whoopty fucking do You don’t care. Yet you read it and posted twice. Interesting. Maybe try reading it and understanding it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Zambroski said: The indictments are coming for these Republicans that killed of these 15,000 people to out of spite for Obama. Its all in the Mueller report! Poor snowflake. I see the problem. You are mistaking the topic title that MC wrote with the content from the researchers. It’s a common mistake many idiots would make. Edited July 24, 2019 by revkevsdi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 1 minute ago, revkevsdi said: Poor snowflake. I see the problem. You are mistaking the topic title that MC wrote with the content from the researchers. It’s a common mistake many idiots would make. That was the title of the article that the writers chose you fucking idiot. Did YOU even read it? Oh my! Do you self mutilate? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 I have some things to do. Why don’t you Trumpsters read the article two or three times and try to understand it. Forget about the esquire part and concentrate on the study and what it revealed. Let’s see if any of you can make a reasonable argument against their research. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: I have some things to do. Why don’t you Trumpsters read the article two or three times and try to understand it. Forget about the esquire part and concentrate on the study and what it revealed. Let’s see if any of you can make a reasonable argument against their research. Thanks for stopping by. We’ll all look forward to your next showing. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted July 24, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 24, 2019 7 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: You don’t care. Yet you read it and posted twice. Interesting. Maybe try reading it and understanding it. I posted to you about your pathetic cry for attention.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 4 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: I have some things to do. Why don’t you Trumpsters read the article two or three times and try to understand it. Forget about the esquire part and concentrate on the study and what it revealed. Let’s see if any of you can make a reasonable argument against their research. Hey, if they wanted anyone to really read and understand the article they would have put a more factual title on it. Instead, they just wanted to catch the libs that are still hurt about the election. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 5 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: I have some things to do. Why don’t you Trumpsters read the article two or three times and try to understand it. Forget about the esquire part and concentrate on the study and what it revealed. Let’s see if any of you can make a reasonable argument against their research. Yah sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 6 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Yah sure. No, NO!!! “Forget about MC’s title....that wasn’t part of the story!!” Except, that’s what the authors entitled it. “HIGH FACTUAL REPORTING.....DID YOU EVEN READ THE ARTICLE!!?!!!?” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted July 24, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 24, 2019 1 hour ago, revkevsdi said: Two deflections and a misrepresentation of the research. I don’t think any of you read it This is research from a least biased source with a high factual reporting history Why are you afraid of reading it? I just don't care. 1) When someone dosnt go to the Dr when , that's on them. 2) It isn't free money , you seem to keep missing that part Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmeeAgain Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 2 hours ago, revkevsdi said: Overall, we rate Fraser Institute strongly Right-Center biased based on policy positions that favors business and Mixed for factual reporting due to false and misleading claims regarding global warming. https://www.vancouverobserver.com/politics/charitable-fraser-institute-received-43-million-foreign-funding-2000 Fraser institute are brutal. They have always seemed like a large reputable org. But it’s a bit of a sham. Have you seen any of this? I did a little googling and those numbers are what other sources are reporting too. Other articles stated that the wait times are the longest of any country in the world. 3 years ago my wife had a lump in her cheek (been there for years) that really started to bother her. She got a referral to the University of Michigan otolaryngology department (number 1 rated in the world). It took 2 weeks for that appointment because we wanted the last one of the day because it's about a 2 hr drive. On the way there was a fatality from an accident on the expressway so the cops closed it for 2 hrs. We were stuck, unable to move for that time. We tried to call but you can't call a department directly there. We arrived 1.5 hrs late and they were still there waiting for us - over an hr after they closed. They didn't know about the accident, but they knew we were coming from a long way away. They called the pathologist who was in his car leaving, but still in the parking structure. He came back in and checked the biopsy samples as they took them of the cyst. Third one was cancer. This was Wednesday and her surgery was on Friday. 4+ hr surgery where they have to peel your face back to get to it because they don't want to damage a nerve. All is good now. We may have to pay for our insurance separately, but the healthcare quality and knowledge is second to no one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 9 hours ago, Zambroski said: No, NO!!! “Forget about MC’s title....that wasn’t part of the story!!” Except, that’s what the authors entitled it. “HIGH FACTUAL REPORTING.....DID YOU EVEN READ THE ARTICLE!!?!!!?” That isn’t the title of the research paper you fucktard. 10 hours and non of you Trumpsters were able the refute the findings In the study. Not even one reasonable argument. Dumb and dumberer all day every day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 (edited) 7 hours ago, SmeeAgain said: Have you seen any of this? I did a little googling and those numbers are what other sources are reporting too. Other articles stated that the wait times are the longest of any country in the world. 3 years ago my wife had a lump in her cheek (been there for years) that really started to bother her. She got a referral to the University of Michigan otolaryngology department (number 1 rated in the world). It took 2 weeks for that appointment because we wanted the last one of the day because it's about a 2 hr drive. On the way there was a fatality from an accident on the expressway so the cops closed it for 2 hrs. We were stuck, unable to move for that time. We tried to call but you can't call a department directly there. We arrived 1.5 hrs late and they were still there waiting for us - over an hr after they closed. They didn't know about the accident, but they knew we were coming from a long way away. They called the pathologist who was in his car leaving, but still in the parking structure. He came back in and checked the biopsy samples as they took them of the cyst. Third one was cancer. This was Wednesday and her surgery was on Friday. 4+ hr surgery where they have to peel your face back to get to it because they don't want to damage a nerve. All is good now. We may have to pay for our insurance separately, but the healthcare quality and knowledge is second to no one. There are many sources who want you to believe that. After all, there is big money in private healthcare. Not one country has turned back from private healthcare. FYI. Our life expectancy is longer in Canada and our infant mortality rate is much lower. But those are just facts. As long as you feel yours is better , enjoy paying extra for it. Edited July 24, 2019 by revkevsdi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted July 24, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 24, 2019 6 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: That isn’t the title of the research paper you fucktard. 10 hours and non of you Trumpsters were able the refute the findings In the study. Not even one reasonable argument. Dumb and dumberer all day every day. Just invite him over to spoon and cuddle already will ya FFS. Always flirting back and forth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.