Snoslinger Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 the doj is letting it be known congress will be seeing less redacted stuff in the report, including information about stone's upcoming trial. magically, important information will be leaked to the press, resulting in a mistrial for stone, and he'll get off. why else would congress be alloweed to see that information, and not other stuff? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 You mean this is just more of the garbage you seen over at DU and you’re passing it off as your own 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted April 18, 2019 Author Share Posted April 18, 2019 Just now, DUMPY said: You mean this is just more of the garbage you seen over at DU and you’re passing it off as your own nope, i have seen this nowhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Just now, Snoslinger said: nope, i have seen this nowhere. Sure sounds believable Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SVT MXZ XRS Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 2 minutes ago, DUMPY said: You mean this is just more of the garbage you seen over at DU and you’re passing it off as your own Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted April 18, 2019 Author Share Posted April 18, 2019 1 minute ago, DUMPY said: Sure sounds believable well search for it ya simpleton. hell you probably already did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: well search for it ya simpleton. hell you probably already did. Don’t care. Because if you posted it then it has about a 99% chance of being very wrong 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SVT MXZ XRS Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Just now, DUMPY said: Don’t care. Because if you posted it then it has about a 99% chance of being very wrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teamgreen02 Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 (edited) 33 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: the doj is letting it be known congress will be seeing less redacted stuff in the report, including information about stone's upcoming trial. magically, important information will be leaked to the press, resulting in a mistrial for stone, and he'll get off. why else would congress be alloweed to see that information, and not other stuff? Are you suggesting we don't let people with security clearances see classified information because they will leak it? Edited April 18, 2019 by teamgreen02 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Just now, teamgreen02 said: Are you suggesting we don't let people with security clearances see classified information because they will leak it? Then no redactions are necessary... Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted April 18, 2019 Author Share Posted April 18, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, teamgreen02 said: Are you suggesting we don't let people with security clearances see classified information because they will leak it? no, i'm suggesting one of trump's cronies will be the one leaking the info, secretly. dingaling. holy shit. do i need to spell it out more? Edited April 18, 2019 by Snoslinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teamgreen02 Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Just now, NaturallyAspirated said: Then no redactions are necessary... Neal Intel committee members of congress will see the report with no redacts besides the grand jury information which is restricted by law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teamgreen02 Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: no, i'm suggesting one of trump's cronies will be the one leaking the info, secretly. dingaling. holy shit. do i need to spell it out more? So you are saying we should go after criminal leaks then? If so, hold on to your hat. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted April 18, 2019 Author Share Posted April 18, 2019 Just now, teamgreen02 said: Intel committee members of congress will see the report with no redacts besides the grand jury information which is restricted by law. no they will not. have you not been paying attention? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Just now, teamgreen02 said: Intel committee members of congress will see the report with no redacts besides the grand jury information which is restricted by law. Are you saying we can't trust those with security clearances to not leak it? Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted April 18, 2019 Author Share Posted April 18, 2019 the dems will have to fight this tooth and nail to get anyone else to see the unredacted report. the same applies to his tax returns. the dude thinks he's above the law and he found a crony AG who agrees with him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teamgreen02 Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Just now, NaturallyAspirated said: Are you saying we can't trust those with security clearances to not leak it? Neal Absolutely. And we should investigate and prosecute criminal leak. 4 members of congress will see the unredacted report, minus the grand jury information. What's your objection to that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted April 18, 2019 Author Share Posted April 18, 2019 how much more fucking proof do you need? fuck, you'd shit your pants if a fraction of this occurred with a dem. actually, you have already done that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted April 18, 2019 Author Share Posted April 18, 2019 Just now, teamgreen02 said: Absolutely. And we should investigate and prosecute criminal leak. 4 members of congress will see the unredacted report, minus the grand jury information. What's your objection to that? you keep saying that. link? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: the dems will have to fight this tooth and nail to get anyone else to see the unredacted report. the same applies to his tax returns. the dude thinks he's above the law and he found a crony AG who agrees with him. the Kenyan thought he was above the law. Holder Lynch just to name a few Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member Kivalo Posted April 18, 2019 Gold Member Share Posted April 18, 2019 (edited) Release the fucking thing in its entirety, fuck this classified bullshit. They use that bs just as an excuse to hide shit from the public anyway. Fuck congress and DOJ. Edited April 18, 2019 by Kivalo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 4 minutes ago, teamgreen02 said: Absolutely. And we should investigate and prosecute criminal leak. 4 members of congress will see the unredacted report, minus the grand jury information. What's your objection to that? Why not all? Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teamgreen02 Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 4 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: you keep saying that. link? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Just now, Kivalo said: Release the fucking thing in its entirety, fuck this classified bullshit. They use that bs just as an excuse to hide shit from the public anyway. Fuck congress and DOJ. Well, there’s a matter of Constitutional rights and law that won’t allow it. Still, the “meat” should all be there. One thing is for sure, there will be plenty of crying over it. None of it worthy though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 7 minutes ago, teamgreen02 said: Absolutely. And we should investigate and prosecute criminal leak. 4 members of congress will see the unredacted report, minus the grand jury information. What's your objection to that? Also isn't it going to the gang of 8, not 4? Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.