NaturallyAspirated Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 A good thing? Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted December 19, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 19, 2018 Useless. Its like saying 6ft 3 in Hispanics with one eye and 13 homes cant own guns. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01mxz800 Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 get rid of those things, surprised it took this long 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 So Trump is officially responsible for more gun control than Obama... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted December 19, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 19, 2018 Binary trigger FTW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 It's just another pick axe swing by The Man to erode away at our rights. Or a political ploy by the administration, so they can claim they have made larger progress on a critical issue to please the majority voters. 27 minutes ago, motonoggin said: So Trump is officially responsible for more gun control than Obama... What's the difference? Anyone proficient with a firearm can bump fire w/o the use of this cheesy accessory. 46 minutes ago, 01mxz800 said: get rid of those things, surprised it took this long Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Just now, Skidooski said: Binary trigger FTW honestly there really is no tactical advantage to having an automatic, unless it's like squad assault weapon or something like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 2 minutes ago, Skidooski said: Binary trigger FTW now, shut the fuck up before they put their sights on that too!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 1 minute ago, motonoggin said: honestly there really is no tactical advantage to having an automatic, unless it's like squad assault weapon or something like that. Yep. There is a reason the military doesn’t use automatic rifles/carbines. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted December 19, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 19, 2018 Just now, motonoggin said: honestly there really is no tactical advantage to having an automatic, unless it's like squad assault weapon or something like that. I think it would be fun at the range once or twice Just now, Whiskey Tango Foxtrot said: now, shut the fuck up before they put their sights on that too!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 2 minutes ago, motonoggin said: honestly there really is no tactical advantage to having an automatic, unless it's like squad assault weapon or something like that. I agree, though it is fun as fuck. What do you have against fun? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Furthermore, the idea that the Vegas shooter was able to shoot more rounds due to his bump stock is laughable. He was less accurate due to it. Bump stock at that range is silly. I could see it in a close range situation where people are packed in like sardines. Even then, shit still shoots fast pulling the trigger one by one. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 1 minute ago, Skidooski said: I think it would be fun at the range once or twice No doubt Just now, Whiskey Tango Foxtrot said: I agree, though it is fun as fuck. What do you have against fun? Nothing. I'm just waiting for the day they ban tannerite Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted December 19, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 19, 2018 Just now, motonoggin said: No doubt Nothing. I'm just waiting for the day they ban tannerite No doubt and surprised it hasn't happened yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 1 minute ago, motonoggin said: I'm just waiting for the day they ban tannerite OK, now you shut the fuck up too! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 3 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: Furthermore, the idea that the Vegas shooter was able to shoot more rounds due to his bump stock is laughable. He was less accurate due to it. Bump stock at that range is silly. I could see it in a close range situation where people are packed in like sardines. Even then, shit still shoots fast pulling the trigger one by one. Think man, you're brighter than that. Quote fired more than 1,100 rounds from his suite on the 32nd floor of the nearby Mandalay Bay hotel, killing 58 people and leaving 851 injured ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Las_Vegas_shooting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 1 minute ago, Mileage Psycho said: Think man, you're brighter than that. No, he is correct. The bump stock is a toy, not proficient for viable mass damage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member BOHICA Posted December 19, 2018 Gold Member Share Posted December 19, 2018 It crazy to think rate of fire increasers are legal while a muffler on the end of the barrel takes a bunch of scrutiny. I don’t like a ban.... but should be put in the same category that suppressors are and require the same scrutiny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 1 minute ago, BOHICA said: It crazy to think rate of fire increasers are legal while a muffler on the end of the barrel takes a bunch of scrutiny. I don’t like a ban.... but should be put in the same category that suppressors are and require the same scrutiny. Don't suppressors require an FFL stamp? Isn't that the same FFL stamp that is required to possess and automatic sear? Or no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 1 minute ago, Mileage Psycho said: Think man, you're brighter than that. Alright, I’m going to have to learn you here. The Vegas shooter shot 1100 rounds because there was no one able to stop him. He had time. The 1100 rounds was a result of opportunity not of rate of fire. Rate of fire, while effective in certain situations and with certain weapons is wholly ineffective with a light barrel weapon at that distance. It degrades the shooter’s ability to accurately control there fire at both point and area targets. While he was able to fire a lot and kill a lot, that was in spite of the fact that he used an improper shooting technique and setup. An AR-15 shot in a controlled manner would have resulted in a much more effective outcome (As sad as that is to say). The bump stock effectively runs rounds up and to the right for a right handed shooter. He was using scopes which would make those scopes unusable at that range. Furthermore, with his time allowed, controlled firing at a sustained rate of fire would have netted him more accuracy. I suggest you think. You are brighter than to question my knowledge on this subject as not only a sniper but as an Advanced Rifle Marksman trainer. Please feel free to retract your statement. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted December 19, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 19, 2018 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted December 19, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 19, 2018 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted December 19, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 19, 2018 (edited) The people should at minimum have the right to the same weapons as local, state and federal law enforcement. JMHO. Trump fucked up here. He will lose votes over this. Edited December 19, 2018 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01mxz800 Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 2 hours ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: Alright, I’m going to have to learn you here. The Vegas shooter shot 1100 rounds because there was no one able to stop him. He had time. The 1100 rounds was a result of opportunity not of rate of fire. Rate of fire, while effective in certain situations and with certain weapons is wholly ineffective with a light barrel weapon at that distance. It degrades the shooter’s ability to accurately control there fire at both point and area targets. While he was able to fire a lot and kill a lot, that was in spite of the fact that he used an improper shooting technique and setup. An AR-15 shot in a controlled manner would have resulted in a much more effective outcome (As sad as that is to say). The bump stock effectively runs rounds up and to the right for a right handed shooter. He was using scopes which would make those scopes unusable at that range. Furthermore, with his time allowed, controlled firing at a sustained rate of fire would have netted him more accuracy. I suggest you think. You are brighter than to question my knowledge on this subject as not only a sniper but as an Advanced Rifle Marksman trainer. Please feel free to retract your statement. wincexlt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.