Mileage Psycho Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Hmmm Quote Christine Blasey Ford's attorneys release polygraph results on Kavanaugh allegations Results of a polygraph test taken by Judge Brett Kavanaugh accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, indicate her responses to the two questions asked of her about her sexual assault allegations against him to be "not indicative of deception," according to the report on the polygraph. The polygraph test was administered on August 7, one week after she wrote a letter to Sen. Dianne Feinstein detailing her story of the assault. For the test, Ford gave her account, in which she alleges that when they were both in high school, Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed during a party and groped her, trying to remove her clothing. When she tried to scream, Ford said Kavanaugh held his hand over her mouth. Following Ford's interview she was given a polygraph examination with the following two questions: Is any part of your statement false?Did you make up any part of your statement? Ford answered "no" to both questions. "Blasey's responses to the above relevant questions are not indicative of deception," the report read. Two more analyses of Ford's responses also suggested she had been truthful. Jerry Hanafin, who conducted the polygraph test, told CBS News' Ed O'Keefe that it was unlikely that in her response, Ford believed something that was not true, and passed the test because she believed it was true. Hanafin said that when he first met Ford, she was nervous, like most people who take polygraphs are. He added that it was an "unremarkable" test, which is standard. He also acknowledged that regardless of the results, there is "a certain segment that'll just say this is just junk science." The results were sent to counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee by Ford's attorneys in advance of Thursday's hearing, when both Kavanaugh and Ford will testify about the allegations. Beth Wilkinson, who is Kavanaugh's attorney, is interested in seeing the therapy sessions notes, which she says are important to corroborate claims made by Ford. "Apparently in those notes, there's a differing story about how many people were present at the party, there's no mention of Judge Kavanaugh, and so all that information would be very important to determine whether there's any corroboration of this allegation," Wilkinson on "CBS This Morning" Wednesday. Ford's attorneys said in their letter that they would not produce their client's medical records because they contain "private, highly sensitive information that is not necessary for the committee to assess the credibility of her testimony." Since Ford's allegation surfaced, two other women, Deborah Ramirez and Julie Swetnick, have made accusations against Kavanaugh. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/christine-blasey-fords-attorneys-release-polygraph-results-on-kavanaugh-allegations/ar-AAAGExJ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Poor bootlicking Highmark obviously she is a criminal mastermind funded by Soros and capable of fooling polygraph test with 100% certainty 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Border patrol agents need to take a polygraph test. As do FBI agents. So should SC nominees. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 So she passed a test admitting there was no sexual assault. Good talk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member Stephen Hawking Posted September 27, 2018 Gold Member Share Posted September 27, 2018 Is Vince taking over the straw grasping duties tonight? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hayward Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 You know what, i've got an idea that will put this whole thing to bed, and show for sure whether he did it or not. The FBI ought to somehow dig through her phone calls over the past 2 months and find out just what was said during conversations with whomever, and that ought to do it. She surely wouldn't be that good of an actress if she's making it up. Save everyone a whole lot of time and money..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 I thought he would withdraw by tonight. The repubs sure want their federalist judge and they are risking the senate in 6 weeks to get him in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 14 minutes ago, hayward said: You know what, i've got an idea that will put this whole thing to bed, and show for sure whether he did it or not. The FBI ought to somehow dig through her phone calls over the past 2 months and find out just what was said during conversations with whomever, and that ought to do it. She surely wouldn't be that good of an actress if she's making it up. Save everyone a whole lot of time and money..... Same could be said if the judge. Dig through his phone records, emails, and texts. See how many high school buddies he suddenly got in touch with and why. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 3 minutes ago, Mainecat said: I thought he would withdraw by tonight. The repubs sure want their federalist judge and they are risking the senate in 6 weeks to get him in. Why? You don’t think the Dems are going to win the senate already...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hayward Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 8 hours ago, ActionfigureJoe said: Same could be said if the judge. Dig through his phone records, emails, and texts. See how many high school buddies he suddenly got in touch with and why. but muh 4th!!!!1111 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 27, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 27, 2018 9 hours ago, f7ben said: Poor bootlicking Highmark obviously she is a criminal mastermind funded by Soros and capable of fooling polygraph test with 100% certainty Dude didn't you read anything on those results? Even CNN sniffed that out last night. They were laughable because of the way it was administered. She had inconsistencies in the hand written note she submitted to the examiner and the questions asked were very limited and broad. They are suppose to be very specific. https://www.nationalreview.com/news/christine-blasey-fords-polygraph-statement-inconsistent-with-letter-dianne-feinstein/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Just now, Highmark said: Dude didn't you read anything on those results? Even CNN sniffed that out last night. They were laughable because of the way it was administered. She had inconsistencies in the hand written note she submitted to the examiner and the questions asked were very limited and broad. They are suppose to be very specific. https://www.nationalreview.com/news/christine-blasey-fords-polygraph-statement-inconsistent-with-letter-dianne-feinstein/ Did you even see a question about Kavanaugh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted September 27, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 27, 2018 3 minutes ago, Highmark said: Dude didn't you read anything on those results? Even CNN sniffed that out last night. They were laughable because of the way it was administered. She had inconsistencies in the hand written note she submitted to the examiner and the questions asked were very limited and broad. They are suppose to be very specific. https://www.nationalreview.com/news/christine-blasey-fords-polygraph-statement-inconsistent-with-letter-dianne-feinstein/ More lies from Skidmark.......defending Dump and BK has you flustered Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USA Contributing Member $poorsledder$ Posted September 27, 2018 USA Contributing Member Share Posted September 27, 2018 Why not give him the same type of test? When (ok.....if) it comes back clean we can argue over the test results for 2 months and maybe drag it out to 2020. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 27, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 27, 2018 Just now, SnowRider said: More lies from Skidmark.......defending Dump and BK has you flustered Lies? There wasn't inconsistencies in her stories? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted September 27, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 27, 2018 1 minute ago, Highmark said: Lies? There wasn't inconsistencies in her stories? Dude you’ve been attacking every woman and defending Dump/BK non stop with the daily right wing rhetoric. You’re living in a fog. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 27, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 27, 2018 7 minutes ago, Snake said: Did you even see a question about Kavanaugh? Nope. 2 questions and neither about him. They were about her statement. Examiners on last night said this was completely inappropriate way to do an examination. They must be detailed on what they ask. https://thefederalistpapers.org/opinion/fords-lawyers-just-released-polygraph-bad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 5 minutes ago, Highmark said: Nope. 2 questions and neither about him. They were about her statement. Examiners on last night said this was completely inappropriate way to do an examination. They must be detailed on what they ask. https://thefederalistpapers.org/opinion/fords-lawyers-just-released-polygraph-bad The hell you say! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 27, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 27, 2018 (edited) Unreal. You don't ask questions about the statement you ask questions about the actual incident. https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/09/27/kavanaugh-ford-polygraph-test-results-hanafin-sot-vpx.cnn http://video.foxnews.com/v/5840709120001/?#sp=show-clips Edited September 27, 2018 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 27, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 27, 2018 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Snake said: She threatened a guys wife and family bro......his baby! The chicks a nutbag. “Right after I broke up with her, she was threatening my family, threatening my wife and threatening to do harm to my baby at that time,” Vinneccy said. “I know a lot about her.” https://www.nationalreview.com/news/kavanaugh-hearing-julie-swetnick-restraining-order/ Edited September 27, 2018 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Swetnick seems like a mental case Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 27, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 27, 2018 4 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said: Swetnick seems like a mental case Why do the "accusers" always hire an attorney prior to coming forward? To see how to avoid getting in trouble.....that's why. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 4 minutes ago, Highmark said: Why do the "accusers" always hire an attorney prior to coming forward? To see how to avoid getting in trouble.....that's why. Yes because it’s all a setup Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 17 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said: Yes because it’s all a setup Says she went to these train parties 10 times. Obviously it was an enjoyable experience... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.