Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

U.S. goods trade deficit rises as exports fall


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, frenchy said:

This will be interesting to watch. 

It was always about the trade deficit. Fixing the deficit. Other countries stealing from the US. Can’t wait to see what the narrative changes to when he can’t reduce it. 

There will be some doozy excuses here shortly :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, frenchy said:

This will be interesting to watch. 

It was always about the trade deficit. Fixing the deficit. Other countries stealing from the US. Can’t wait to see what the narrative changes to when he can’t reduce it. 

best to just do nothing and hope it all works out on its own right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh look more storys on the local news tonight about the shortage of trades workers and how contractors are giving huge dining bonuses and building there own schools to entice young workers  

odd I don't rember any story's like this at all let alone every week for the past 13 yrs . odd 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ez ryder said:

the fact that other counterys have been gettingbthe long end of the stock for decades when it comes to US trade policy or lack there of 

lol I do love story time with trump and those who swallow it as fact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member

:lol:   I have to laugh at the ignorance here.   

1. Trade deals are just being done.

2. Strong dollar has a large impact on imports/exports.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Highmark said:

:lol:   I have to laugh at the ignorance here.   

1. Trade deals are just being done.

2. Strong dollar has a large impact on imports/exports.  

So in 2 years the trade deficit will be: 

1. Significantly lower 

2. Significantly higher 

3. Roughly the same +/- $50-75B

:dunno: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 minute ago, frenchy said:

So in 2 years the trade deficit will be: 

1. Significantly lower 

2. Significantly higher 

3. Roughly the same +/- $50-75B

:dunno: 

Tough to say because the strength of the dollar plays such a significant role.   I'm not as fixated on the number as a deficit or surplus as I am wanting to see our products get a fair shake (equal tariffs).   The deficit as a number plays well in politics but fair trade is fair trade even if we run a large deficit.   American can't come close to producing all we consume.   We will always run a trade deficit but that doesn't mean we shouldn't demand equal or at least fair markets for our products.  

  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Highmark said:

Tough to say because the strength of the dollar plays such a significant role.   I'm not as fixated on the number as a deficit or surplus as I am wanting to see our products get a fair shake (equal tariffs).   The deficit as a number plays well in politics but fair trade is fair trade even if we run a large deficit.   American can't come close to producing all we consume.   We will always run a trade deficit but that doesn't mean we shouldn't demand equal or at least fair markets for our products.  

  

That’s a fair answer. And my point was mainly the trade deficit is overblown and trumps fixation on it is stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, frenchy said:

So in 2 years the trade deficit will be: 

1. Significantly lower 

2. Significantly higher 

3. Roughly the same +/- $50-75B

:dunno: 

You need to include proper metrics to measure that. Looking at year to year with a vastly different strength of dollar is disingenuous. If the dollar is drastically higher and we have a slightly better trade deficit ($50-$75B) then when it was drastically lower, that is a pretty big deal. Also, measuring the trade deficit before tariffs are even empirically measurable is foolish. Right now tariffs are effecting projections and future strategy, not the actual physical sum. This isn’t a 6 mo or 1 yr process. This sort of policy fleshes out over years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Tough to say because the strength of the dollar plays such a significant role.   I'm not as fixated on the number as a deficit or surplus as I am wanting to see our products get a fair shake (equal tariffs).   The deficit as a number plays well in politics but fair trade is fair trade even if we run a large deficit.   American can't come close to producing all we consume.   We will always run a trade deficit but that doesn't mean we shouldn't demand equal or at least fair markets for our products.  

  

Gets it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
6 minutes ago, frenchy said:

That’s a fair answer. And my point was mainly the trade deficit is overblown and trumps fixation on it is stupid. 

Its politics dude.   If you pay attention his real goal of which he has stated a number of times is equal tariffs.  Its obvious many don't have the slightest clue what all goes into trade balance and the deficit rings home whether its the important factor or not.  

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

You need to include proper metrics to measure that. Looking at year to year with a vastly different strength of dollar is disingenuous. If the dollar is drastically higher and we have a slightly better trade deficit ($50-$75B) then when it was drastically lower, that is a pretty big deal. Also, measuring the trade deficit before tariffs are even empirically measurable is foolish. Right now tariffs are effecting projections and future strategy, not the actual physical sum. This isn’t a 6 mo or 1 yr process. This sort of policy fleshes out over years. 

I realize that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Tough to say because the strength of the dollar plays such a significant role.   I'm not as fixated on the number as a deficit or surplus as I am wanting to see our products get a fair shake (equal tariffs).   The deficit as a number plays well in politics but fair trade is fair trade even if we run a large deficit.   American can't come close to producing all we consume.   We will always run a trade deficit but that doesn't mean we shouldn't demand equal or at least fair markets for our products.  

  

Does it ever.:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, frenchy said:

That’s a fair answer. And my point was mainly the trade deficit is overblown and trumps fixation on it is stupid. 

Trump has also created an anti US sentiment on buying American products on trade. Just as rooms in the trump towers are being discounted for s reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, frenchy said:

This will be interesting to watch. 

It was always about the trade deficit. Fixing the deficit. Other countries stealing from the US. Can’t wait to see what the narrative changes to when he can’t reduce it. 

trump, and damn near all his followers, don't grasp the trade deficit concept. they think the US is getting screwed on all that money :lol:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...