Rigid1

That orange sled in the video ran 131mph in 500ft..fucking sick!!

It was!! Frigging awesome!! Does the video show up??

MOV_0126.mp4

SR is a train wreck,..I wouldn't ban him unless he breaks the rules,..I actually look forward to see what he posts,...I get that,.."I can't believe someone is that stupid" feeling..makes my day...We can't get rid of the site punching bag..

Bahahahahahahahaha!!!

Oh I think we all would agree it would be great for the middle class, but do we believe it is the real question. IMO its all BS to get that vote.

To bad she is known for saying one thing and doing another,..I read that and just think to get elected so she can line her pockets..

But but, Trump got a signed Tebow football helmet!!

The guys are working hard on track prep, going to be an awesome event!!!

My rule # 1) Don't "friend" people that are not your friend. No casual acquaintances. Definitely creepy.. I am pretty strict with my FB page, lots of creepers out there.. When I was internet dating fucking every chick after the first date or two would send me a friends request. I would never accept it..I would always get "Hey, I sent you friends request on FB, did you see it? ".. Im like yea, I saw it. Then the FB crap would start, "why didnt you accept it, what are you hiding?" Im like block and delete phone #, send all calls to voice mail.. C-YA!! lol

Its south east of syracuse, Bouckville NY

ok so thats what you got on Trump, a helmet and a painting, Hillary did this.. When does a favor for a friend become “pay for play” in American politics? That’s a pretty gray area, but assuming we could ever draw that line the Clintons have surely obliterated it. The amount of money which has flowed through the Clinton Foundation from influential persons around the world is already legendary. Some have wound up asking for favors, meetings, preferred seating at diplomatic dinners or just to have a good word put in on their behalf. But others appear to have gotten something far more concrete in terms of a quid pro quo. The Washington Examiner goes through some of the numbers this week and finds that of all advisory appointments made during her tenure, around 40% (!) went to foundation donors. Just to put on the “fair and balanced” hat for a moment, not every political appointment is an indication of the trading of favors. The State Department appoints a lot of people to these various advisory boards and to expect someone with Hillary Clinton’s history to only fill all those seats with total strangers is unreasonable. The fact that there are so many donors to the Clinton Foundation makes it even harder to make that an immediate disqualifier. Along those lines, some of the appointments highlighted by the Examiner article don’t really raise any red flags. The best example is probably Clinton’s appointment of two executives from UPS and FedEx. Yes, they donated heavily to the foundation, but they were named to the postal and delivery advisory board. Kind of hard to deny that they have expertise in that area. But then there are all the cases like the appointment of Kaki Hockersmith. She was put on the United States National Commission on UNESCO, a position where she would be responsible for looking into international humanitarian development. It’s a big job, and I’m sure she was served well by her extensive experience from the Arkansas Governors Mansion Associationand her work as an interior designer who decorated the Clinton White House. (The fact that she bundled $100,000 for Hillary’s 2008 campaign no doubt also gave her a lot of background in humanitarian work.) This is a long list and it will take a while to dig through in its entirely. But before we close, just look at the spread of people receiving these appointments from Hillary Clinton while she was Secretary of State. Out of 511 advisory appointments, more than 200 of them (roughly 40%) were foundation donors. Isn’t that a bit much to simply be coincidence? So Sr, what is more shady??

this!

As usual, you got nothing but a helmet to hang your hat on. SR, this is 2 bit hack stuff.. ..You do know there is actually no wrong doing by the Trump foundation or Trump himself if the helmet was: 1) Donated right back to the charity 2) Given away 3) Donated to another charity 4) Kept by them for a later charity auction

SR, its a football helmet, bid on and won at auction for the Susan G Koman Foundation by Trump. SMH so the question is where is the helmet?? or Where are all 13 of hillary's phones she lied about when she said she only had 1?? The laptop that was "lost" and the portable hard drive that was also supposedly "lost"?? Answer this SR, whats more relevant in the election and more important to get to the bottom of?? A helmet?? or her devices used to store and communicate classified government material that are missing?? WTF, a fucking hemet is all you guys have to hang your hat on, fucking bottom of the barrel right their..

But again, they don't know if the helmet and painting were kept by trump himself,..and again the helmet and painting were bid on at charity auctions,..and again wgaf..

Is the birther deal even relevant, the guy is out in a few months,.. Wgaf at this point,..there are way bigger fish to fry

No, you have to be a nigger,..blacks go to work, are respectable citizens in society ,..there's a difference so ya know..

Speaking of faggots, whats SR ride?? Oh shit, let me clarify,.. besides the dirty end of Hillary's double headed dildo..

Yep,..still waiting on an honest answer to that one Biggie,..They seem to ignore my questions when it has to do with the content of their character. Ridiculous how much either white guilt or hypocrisy they have on their backs..

but didnt the hillary camp and hillary herself get pissed because Matt asked here questions she didnt like??? which would make her what MC???

I dont look at the polling #'s, that stuff is so fudged, I just listen, read, talk to some respected friend and family about their opinions and then form my own opinion. I highly doubt they are running out to the bayou in louisiana, and the backwoods of montana to get people's opinions.. we will see who shows up for the election cycle..and 45% is a large amount of peeps..I would call that a "mass" of peeps..

Sure, anything is possible with this crazy election cycle. I have to say this is the most wacked out one I have seen since I have been following politics.