Crnr2Crnr Posted August 16, 2023 Author Share Posted August 16, 2023 2 minutes ago, ckf said: You better up the bet because I don't think that a 1099 is necessary for chump change I'd do it purely out of spite, if I lost. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 16, 2023 Share Posted August 16, 2023 2 minutes ago, ckf said: You better up the bet because I don't think that a 1099 is necessary for chump change Maybe it's in bitcoin and could be worth millions come tax time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckf Posted August 16, 2023 Share Posted August 16, 2023 2 minutes ago, Crnr2Crnr said: I'd do it purely out of spite, if I lost. 2 minutes ago, HSR said: Maybe it's in bitcoin and could be worth millions come tax time I'm not that lucky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted August 16, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 16, 2023 (edited) 45 minutes ago, Crnr2Crnr said: $100 on the entire indictment being thrown out and never getting to court? Does not include getting certain participants moved to federal court? Is that where we're at? @ckf - looks like one of us will be sending $100 to the site. Not what I meant. Any conviction is overturned. I don't debate most of it will get to court. Edited August 16, 2023 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crnr2Crnr Posted August 16, 2023 Author Share Posted August 16, 2023 47 minutes ago, Highmark said: Not what I meant. Any conviction is overturned. I don't debate most of it will get to court. I guess the bet is off @ckf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted August 16, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 16, 2023 4 hours ago, Highmark said: I'll put good money that any convictions are overturned. You in? 7 minutes ago, Crnr2Crnr said: I guess the bet is off @ckf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crnr2Crnr Posted August 16, 2023 Author Share Posted August 16, 2023 7 minutes ago, Highmark said: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted August 16, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 16, 2023 4 minutes ago, Crnr2Crnr said: @Crnr2CrnrShow me where I agreed to it? @Crnr2Crnr @Crnr2Crnr 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crnr2Crnr Posted August 16, 2023 Author Share Posted August 16, 2023 5 minutes ago, Highmark said: @Crnr2CrnrShow me where I agreed to it? @Crnr2Crnr @Crnr2Crnr sorry, I don't negotiate with terrorists. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crnr2Crnr Posted August 17, 2023 Author Share Posted August 17, 2023 all part of the plan... this may be the biggest conspiracy in American history Tik Tok . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crnr2Crnr Posted August 17, 2023 Author Share Posted August 17, 2023 L I A R . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted August 17, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 17, 2023 16 hours ago, Crnr2Crnr said: sorry, I don't negotiate with terrorists. So you're a chicken...I get it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crnr2Crnr Posted August 17, 2023 Author Share Posted August 17, 2023 2 hours ago, Highmark said: So you're a chicken...I get it. hardly... what's your take on the Stone audio? still not a conspiracy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted August 17, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 17, 2023 9 minutes ago, Crnr2Crnr said: hardly... what's your take on the Stone audio? still not a conspiracy? You ask more questions than my teachers use to. You mean like when all those celebrities did the same thing trying to get a national audience? Oh and you mean like Jamie Raskin and others have done on the floor of congress? Stone sitting with someone and Trump not there surmising and just throwing things out there. You've got to be shitting me if you think that's a crime. The process of electors changing IS ACTUALLY FUCKING LEGAL according to many constitutional scholars. Its the reason its in the constitution. If they got evidence of a quid pro quo with electors to go against the state vote they may have something. If not its just all free speech. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crnr2Crnr Posted August 17, 2023 Author Share Posted August 17, 2023 7 minutes ago, Highmark said: You ask more questions than my teachers use to. You mean like when all those celebrities did the same thing trying to get a national audience? Oh and you mean like Jamie Raskin and others have done on the floor of congress? Stone sitting with someone and Trump not there surmising and just throwing things out there. You've got to be shitting me if you think that's a crime. The process of electors changing IS ACTUALLY FUCKING LEGAL according to many constitutional scholars. Its the reason its in the constitution. If they got evidence of a quid pro quo with electors to go against the state vote they may have something. If not its just all free speech. ok, you stick with that and I'll stick to my conspiracy theory. see you in court counselor... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted August 17, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 17, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, Crnr2Crnr said: ok, you stick with that and I'll stick to my conspiracy theory. see you in court counselor... Answer me this since you like questions so much. Do you think there is a constitutional method to not seat a President elect? Did the founding fathers actually put that in? Where all those celebrities in that video chirping on something that there was no legal process for? https://ballotpedia.org/Electoral_College Although there is no constitutional provision or federal law requiring electors to vote in accordance with the election results in their state, electors typically vote for their state's popular vote winner. Edited August 17, 2023 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crnr2Crnr Posted August 17, 2023 Author Share Posted August 17, 2023 16 minutes ago, Highmark said: Answer me this since you like questions so much. Do you think there is a constitutional method to not seat a President elect? Did the founding fathers actually put that in? Where all those celebrities in that video chirping on something that there was no legal process for? https://ballotpedia.org/Electoral_College Although there is no constitutional provision or federal law requiring electors to vote in accordance with the election results in their state, electors typically vote for their state's popular vote winner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted August 17, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 17, 2023 11 minutes ago, Crnr2Crnr said: Brilliant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crnr2Crnr Posted August 17, 2023 Author Share Posted August 17, 2023 17 minutes ago, Highmark said: Brilliant. you do know who that is, don't you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 17, 2023 Share Posted August 17, 2023 9 minutes ago, Crnr2Crnr said: you do know who that is, don't you? I don't but the look on his face is hilarious Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crnr2Crnr Posted August 17, 2023 Author Share Posted August 17, 2023 3 minutes ago, HSR said: I don't but the look on his face is hilarious here's a hint... Jack Smith refers to him as coconspirator #2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crnr2Crnr Posted August 17, 2023 Author Share Posted August 17, 2023 Purported names, photos and addresses of Fulton County grand jurors circulate on far-right internet https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/08/17/politics/fulton-county-grand-jurors-far-right-internet/index.html that's not good... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriftBusta Posted August 17, 2023 Share Posted August 17, 2023 4 hours ago, Crnr2Crnr said: So I guess we can assume you're all on board with Project 65? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 17, 2023 Share Posted August 17, 2023 8 minutes ago, DriftBusta said: So I guess we can assume you're all on board with Project 65? I've assumed that you're going to assume what others are assuming regardless what they are assuming. I assume you know this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crnr2Crnr Posted August 17, 2023 Author Share Posted August 17, 2023 12 minutes ago, DriftBusta said: So I guess we can assume you're all on board with Project 65? if project 65 means no one over the age of 65 can be in office in the House, Senate or White House... YES!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.