Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

“Major Suppression” Of Adverse Events By CDC: Dr. Harvey Risch & Dr. Kelly Victory


Recommended Posts

  • Platinum Contributing Member

:news:

https://www.cbs17.com/community/health/coronavirus/fact-check-were-new-covid-19-boosters-tested-in-just-8-mice-should-it-matter/

THE CLAIM: Multiple skeptics on social media have claimed the BA.5-specific booster may be unsafe because, before humans began receiving it, it was tested on only eight mice.

THE FACTS: The basic fact is actually true — the preliminary findings presented by Pfizer were based on tests in eight mice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Highmark said:

No its not.

https://www.science.org/content/article/omicron-booster-shots-are-coming-lots-questions

For the BA.4/BA.5 boosters, the companies have submitted animal data. They have not released those data publicly, although at the June FDA meeting, Pfizer presented preliminary findings in eight mice given BA.4/BA.5 vaccines as their third dose. Compared with the mice that received the original vaccine as a booster, the animals showed an increased response to all Omicron variants tested: BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, BA.4, and BA.5.

Preliminary.  No shit.  So it wasn't approved based on 8 mice.  Thanks for the link that proves AC made this shit up again.  ;)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Highmark said:

No its not.

https://www.science.org/content/article/omicron-booster-shots-are-coming-lots-questions

For the BA.4/BA.5 boosters, the companies have submitted animal data. They have not released those data publicly, although at the June FDA meeting, Pfizer presented preliminary findings in eight mice given BA.4/BA.5 vaccines as their third dose. Compared with the mice that received the original vaccine as a booster, the animals showed an increased response to all Omicron variants tested: BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, BA.4, and BA.5.

Oh FUCK YEAH!!!!

giphy.gif?cid=790b761134e65f4015d15725ca

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, Deephaven said:

Preliminary.  No shit.  So it wasn't approved based on 8 mice.  Thanks for the link that proves AC made this shit up again.  ;)

 

Did the FDA vote on that preliminary finding presented by Pfizer?  :news:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
7 minutes ago, Deephaven said:

So they are supposed to do human trials before asking to do human trials?  Wtf?

You would have been part of human trials when it was only tried on 8 mice?  :lol:   You are good little guinea pig.  :lol:  

It gets better.

The companies say clinical trials for the BA.4/BA.5 vaccines will begin next month; they need clinical data both for full approval of the vaccines—their recent submissions are only for emergency use authorization—and to help develop future updates. Presumably they will measure recipients’ antibody levels, but not the vaccine’s efficacy against infection or severe disease. Such trials are very expensive and were not done for the BA.1 shot either

 

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Highmark said:

You would have been part of human trials when it was only tried on 8 mice?  :lol:   You are good little guinea pig.  :lol:  

 

Captain dumbass stated it was approved based on 8 mice, implying no trials.  You debunked that quick.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what i remember about HCQ and ivermectin trials, is they showed a fair amount of efficacy as an early treatment but not as a late treatment 

to think that Pfizer and fauci had no part of demonizing these drugs would take a ridiculously unintelligent person 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
4 minutes ago, Deephaven said:

Captain dumbass stated it was approved based on 8 mice, implying no trials.  You debunked that quick.  

It was given EUA based off that data dude.   They needed that to begin human trials.  See the edit.   In the trials they never tested to see efficacy against infection or serious disease yet look at what they were proclaiming.  :lol:  

You know its ok to be pro covid vaccine yet have some serious questions to how things were/are handled.  You don't have to be 100% a lapdog of big pharma and the govt. 

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
2 minutes ago, Deephaven said:

Again, let's reiterate the conversation.

AC: the next vax is approved based on testing it on 8 mice

Me: Bullshit

Highmark: confirmed that what AC said is bullshit

 

 

 

 

 

He just can't do it.  :lol:  

 

download - 2022-10-25T134225.562.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, ACE said:

From what i remember about HCQ and ivermectin trials, is they showed a fair amount of efficacy as an early treatment but not as a late treatment 

to think that Pfizer and fauci had no part of demonizing these drugs would take a ridiculously unintelligent person 

Gates had his two cents in those trials, I wonder what the outcome would have been otherwise.

Geez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
5 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Gates had his two cents in those trials, I wonder what the outcome would have been otherwise.

Geez.

I am not anti-covid vaccine.   I encouraged anyone a certain age or preexisting condition to get it however to simply agree 100% with how all of this has been handled and communicated with the public is simply laughable.   Only a handful of those on here and they literally defend EVERYTHING about it. 

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Highmark said:

I am not anti-covid vaccine.   I encouraged anyone a certain age or preexisting condition to get it however to simply agree 100% with how all of this has been handled and communicated with the public is simply laughable.   Only a handful of those on here and they literally defend EVERYTHING about it. 

 

Nobody here is anti-vax, but these aren't vaccines.  If they had concentrated on the sick and elderly and let natural immunity take care of the rest, this pandemic would have been long over.  But that didn't happen cause they want a decade of plandemics to scare the shit out of the sheep to do whatever is asked from their handlers.

There is no $$$ for the global elites in having a healthy population.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So here is just another sad youth who lost her life due to the poison vax that covid would have had zero risk for?

This is every fucking day now and beyond pathetic.

 

Where are the healthy unvaxxed dying this way?  They're aren't any.

 

 

image.thumb.png.8df040131c539d4b5aae87d8e2cb9058.png

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Covid is without a doubt the biggest grift over the past couple of years and its gonna create a whole new revenue stream for the elites.

“The elites” own a lot more than healthcare/pharma. Having less disposable income due to sickness generally isn’t good for capitalism aka “The Elites.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

So here is just another sad youth who lost her life due to the poison vax that covid would have had zero risk for?

This is every fucking day now and beyond pathetic.

 

Where are the healthy unvaxxed dying this way?  They're aren't any.

 

 

image.thumb.png.8df040131c539d4b5aae87d8e2cb9058.png

 

 

 

I believe some here at one point we’re implying that it’s ok because it’s for the greater good 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, akvanden said:

“The elites” own a lot more than healthcare/pharma. Having less disposable income due to sickness generally isn’t good for capitalism aka “The Elites.”

The elites can print all the $$$ they want, they don't want capitalism as that's too hard to manage.  Global Communisn is where it's at for them.  You will own nothing.  They already own most of our governments.

Covid was just the start to the un 2030 agenda.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said:

There is no $$$ for the global elites in having a healthy population.

 

6 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

The elites can print all the $$$ they want


And around and around you go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...