Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted March 23, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2017 10 Posts by Slinger already in this thread and still nada Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Skidooski said: 10 Posts by Slinger already in this thread and still nada please, go to the right and stay there. you're too fucking dumb to be left leaning. I already responded to the dumb question. you are aware there is an investigation going on, right? duh. Edited March 23, 2017 by Snoslinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 and while you're at it dumbski, take a crack at answering the question snakey is avoiding. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 42 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: snakey? You are of the mind the leaks were to get Trump elected. I don't believe that for one second and never will. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted March 23, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2017 12 posts and nothing What else is new Slinger? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 5 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: and while you're at it dumbski, take a crack at answering the question snakey is avoiding. I just saw the fucking thing you cunt. Fuck off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted March 23, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2017 Just now, Snake said: I just saw the fucking thing you cunt. Fuck off. He was taking a shot at me in anger. His party lost big time, they are all pissed off and desperately looking to blame it on anyone or anything else but themselves. It's fucking comical as hell to watch but like most dumb comedies, it get's old fast Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 21 minutes ago, Snake said: You are of the mind the leaks were to get Trump elected. I don't believe that for one second and never will. so wtf were they then, strategically placed around the election? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 23, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, Snoslinger said: well let's see. I'd bet a paycheck that many of those trump, or 3rd party votes, would have gone to Hillary had all the wikileaks damage not occurred. enough to give Hillary the swing states at least, as the votes were close. here's a question for you - if it didn't do anything, why did they do it, right around the election? Wikilieaks was coming out with shit in July. Why did NBC sit on the Trump tapes so long if it was news unless only to damage the GOP elected nominee? Hillary's secret server/classified email info hurt her WAY more than the DNC emails especially when they showed up on a pedophiles laptop and Comey had no choice but to look into it. THAT is what hurt Hillary the most. Are you claiming Russia and Trump had something to do with that? Edited March 23, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 3 minutes ago, Highmark said: Wikilieaks was coming out with shit in July. Why did NBC sit on the Trump tapes so long if it was news unless only to damage the GOP elected nominee? and? why do you always counter a debate about topic a with a deflection to topic b? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted March 23, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2017 I found it!!! Oh wait, wrong person misleading the public.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 23, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, Snoslinger said: well let's see. I'd bet a paycheck that many of those trump, or 3rd party votes, would have gone to Hillary had all the wikileaks damage not occurred. enough to give Hillary the swing states at least, as the votes were close. here's a question for you - if it didn't do anything, why did they do it, right around the election? 10 minutes ago, Highmark said: Wikilieaks was coming out with shit in July. Why did NBC sit on the Trump tapes so long if it was news unless only to damage the GOP elected nominee? Hillary's secret server/classified email info hurt her WAY more than the DNC emails especially when they showed up on a pedophiles laptop and Comey had no choice but to look into it. THAT is what hurt Hillary the most. Are you claiming Russia and Trump had something to do with that? 6 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: and? why do you always counter a debate about topic a with a deflection to topic b? Follow along SnoClinger. You claimed they (easy to assume you meant Russia and Trump) did it right around the election which was false. It started in July. My counter debate ties directly into your claim. If other that to have the most impact on the election why did NBC wait? Hillary got undone by her own doing. Her deciding not to engage parts of the American voter and her email server. Of all the Wikileaks stuff even you guys admitted many times had relatively little to do with Hillary herself but WAY more her staff and the media. I followed the Wikileaks stuff more than most and I can't even recall her personal emails being all that damaging. Edited March 23, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSFB Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 WikiLeaks - Russia/Trump connection Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 23, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 23, 2017 1 minute ago, SSFB said: WikiLeaks - Russia/Trump connection That's fucking awesome. Nice work. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSFB Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Just now, Highmark said: That's fucking awesome. Nice work. Very damning evidence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 21 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: so wtf were they then, strategically placed around the election? They did it to hurt the future President of the country. You remember, Mrs. 95% on election night? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 2 hours ago, Snoslinger said: there's the preview of coming attractions. a dumb fucking question as well. Another Non-answer. 1 hour ago, Snoslinger said: perfect example of the lack of critical thinking skills in this place. a shitload of incriminating stuff is released by groups of people obviously wanting to affect our election. then some dipshits ask how it affected the election take Russia out of it if you like. why did wikileaks reveal the information? And another. But what does Russia have to do with Wikileaks? Assange said it in no way came from them. 1 hour ago, Snoslinger said: well let's see. I'd bet a paycheck that many of those trump, or 3rd party votes, would have gone to Hillary had all the wikileaks damage not occurred. enough to give Hillary the swing states at least, as the votes were close. here's a question for you - if it didn't do anything, why did they do it, right around the election? Again...what does Russia have to do with this? Maybe you tards should be blaming Assange for unwrapping your little crap show. Yes? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 22 minutes ago, SSFB said: WikiLeaks - Russia/Trump connection That's it for me. I'm out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 (edited) 29 minutes ago, Zambroski said: Another Non-answer. And another. But what does Russia have to do with Wikileaks? Assange said it in no way came from them. Again...what does Russia have to do with this? Maybe you tards should be blaming Assange for unwrapping your little crap show. Yes? so you saw I answered the question yet still claim "non-answer"? wtf is with you? as far as snake's response? why wouldn't they have waited until after the election to do all that. quit playing dumb, dude. Edited March 23, 2017 by Snoslinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 wikileaks did not get the podesta emails from the russians .....that is a fact Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 2 minutes ago, f7ben said: wikileaks did not get the podesta emails from the russians .....that is a fact wikileaks made it pretty clear it was not directly from Russian gov. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: wikileaks made it pretty clear it was not directly from Russian gov. not a "state actor" ....... that means associated with Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 (edited) 4 minutes ago, f7ben said: not a "state actor" ....... that means associated with "that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party" that doesn't clear clear up anything Benjamin. the source could be another Russian entity backed by Moscow, yet they could still make that claim. for Christ's sake dude, everyone knows Russia had their hands in all this. Edited March 23, 2017 by Snoslinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: "that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party" that doesn't clear clear up anything Benjamin. the source could be another Russian entity backed by Moscow, yet they could still make that claim. for Christ's sake dude, everyone knows Russia had their hands in all this. no , they dont.....you are swallowing a load of bullshit from people who's job is to lie to you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 1 hour ago, Snoslinger said: so you saw I answered the question yet still claim "non-answer"? wtf is with you? as far as snake's response? why wouldn't they have waited until after the election to do all that. quit playing dumb, dude. Who is "they"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.