Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 22, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 22, 2017 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: the Russian gov put a puppet in our white house and highmark is hung up on some bogus, debunked, rww story about a legal, widely approved, and transparent sale of some uranium. Yes Mr. Putin. Edited March 22, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted March 22, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 22, 2017 9 minutes ago, Rw06GT said: I see our resident idiots are flailing pretty hard this morning. Keep up the good work. I'm not sure how some of the girls are going to make it through the next 4 years. Suicide or stroke is likely in their futures. Poor bastards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 (edited) highmark has been owned at least 10 times on this uranium one story yet he still runs around repeating it. Edited March 22, 2017 by Snoslinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: highmark has been owned at least 10 times on this story yet he still runs around repeating it. You seem to be owned many times per hour and you still run around thinking you're clever, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franks pond Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 13 minutes ago, Highmark said: From the NYT's. Zero outrage from the Clinton voters. As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well. Poor Timeshare Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 13 minutes ago, Highmark said: From the NYT's. Zero outrage from the Clinton voters. As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well. Poor Timeshare Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 13 minutes ago, Highmark said: From the NYT's. Zero outrage from the Clinton voters. As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well. Poor Timeshare Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 13 minutes ago, Highmark said: From the NYT's. Zero outrage from the Clinton voters. As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well. Poor Timeshare Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: tell me what you think happened... Again...keeping it simple. Clinton orchestrated a sale of highly sensitive assets to a country against our best interest using her power of office while receiving a hefty reward toward her foundation to do so. All the while, the Dem liberal media never so much as raising a brow of interest to expose this at any depth to the American people because it would certainly send up red flags within her office and certainly the Obama administration. There....simple enough. No? Then tell me what color you like. That may help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 22, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 22, 2017 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: highmark has been owned at least 10 times on this uranium one story yet he still runs around repeating it. Never been owned once on it. Fact is the Clinton Foundation took over $2.5 million dollars in donations from that company or should I say Oligarch and was given 20% of our Uranium mining rights. Whether or not she was the sole decision maker on that sale is not the point. It looks rotten as hell and the point is she took the money and hide it from her boss which she agreed not to do. If these donations were so acceptable why would she hide them from Obama? These facts are indisputable. Tell me you wouldn't fire an employee that did that to you? The Clinton Foundation is a huge reason she lost the election. Edited March 22, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 5 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: highmark has been owned at least 10 times on this uranium one story yet he still runs around repeating it. Do me a solid. Can you and your idiots "own" him again...just one more time on this story? I'd like to see it. I've got time to wait......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 9 agencies, including the state department, as well as fed and state nuke regulators, had to all sign off on that deal. do you think the deal was "invisible" and conducted by corrupt dems only? you nitwits and your Clinton conspiracies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: 9 agencies, including the state department, as well as fed and state nuke regulators, had to all sign off on that deal. do you think the deal was "invisible" and conducted by corrupt dems only? you nitwits and your Clinton conspiracies. Your double standards are well displayed, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 Oh, BTW...anybody see our host to this thread? He's all fucked up and doesn't know what is going on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: 9 agencies, including the state department, as well as fed and state nuke regulators, had to all sign off on that deal. do you think the deal was "invisible" and conducted by corrupt dems only? you nitwits and your Clinton conspiracies. What administration was that under again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 22, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 22, 2017 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: 9 agencies, including the state department, as well as fed and state nuke regulators, had to all sign off on that deal. do you think the deal was "invisible" and conducted by corrupt dems only? you nitwits and your Clinton conspiracies. Its not just about the deal, its about the donations and hiding them from the Obama admin. Damn dude wake up. Do you think it would be acceptable for the current State Department to sell off some of our oil rights to Russia? Would you be suspicious if the current SoS ran a charity that was receiving donations from a Russian Oligarch whose company benefited from the sale? Fuck you would shit yourself if this happened. Yes or no its a good deal a Russian Company owns 20% of the uranium mining rights in the US? Whose watch did that fall under? Edited March 22, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEFF Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 9 agencies? Which 9 would that be? Who controlled these 9 "agencies"? Slinger just because you think your winning doesn't make it so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franks pond Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 hmm.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 6 minutes ago, Highmark said: Never been owned once on it. Fact is the Clinton Foundation took over $2.5 million dollars in donations from that company or should I say Oligarch and was given 20% of our Uranium mining rights. Whether or not she was the sole decision maker on that sale is not the point. It looks rotten as hell and the point is she took the money and hide it from her boss which she agreed not to do. If these donations were so acceptable why would she hide them from Obama? These facts are indisputable. Tell me you wouldn't fire an employee that did that to you? The Clinton Foundation is a huge reason she lost the election. most of which were made before she even became SOS. sbyl. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 (edited) 6 minutes ago, JEFF said: 9 agencies? Which 9 would that be? Who controlled these 9 "agencies"? Slinger just because you think your winning doesn't make it so. so she hid things from Obama, yet the whole admin was in on this dirty deal? here's an answer to all your questions. what is most concerning with most of you, is your lack of common sense, again. like hillary had this magic wand to make all this shit happen, behind closed doors, and not involving any republicans who'd absolutely love to nail her for something. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/jun/30/donald-trump/donald-trump-inaccurately-suggests-clinton-got-pai/ Edited March 22, 2017 by Snoslinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted March 22, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 22, 2017 10 minutes ago, Zambroski said: Oh, BTW...anybody see our host to this thread? He's all fucked up and doesn't know what is going on. He's taking a nap while Slinger tows the line Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 FAKENEWSMAINECUNT and his and more and Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 22, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 22, 2017 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: most of which were made before she even became SOS. sbyl. You are wrong. Open your eyes dude or come up with some other clever excuse. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html GRAPHIC Donations to the Clinton Foundation, and a Russian Uranium Takeover Uranium investors gave millions to the Clinton Foundation while Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s office was involved in approving a Russian bid for mining assets in Kazakhstan and the United States. OPEN GRAPHIC Edited March 22, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEFF Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: so she hid things from Obama, yet the whole admin was in on this dirty deal? Your the one claiming 9 agencies? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.