Ouch, independents seem to have buyers remorse in a huge way..

 

https://www.npr.org/2022/02/25/1082979837/a-majority-say-bidens-first-year-was-a-failure-a-new-poll-finds

81 million votes...

First one to blame Trump will be...........     

1 hour ago, Skidooski said:

First one to blame Trump will be...........     

It certainly won't be any of his sore loser followers. 

14 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

It certainly won't be any of his sore loser followers. 

And there it is….

Clearly the other party is the better choice...

3 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

Clearly the other party is the better choice...

Clearly this is why I stopped voting. 

6 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

Clearly the other party is the better choice...

 

2 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

Clearly this is why I stopped voting. 

Anything is better than the Biden cabal 

23 minutes ago, Sleepr2 said:

 

Anything is better than the Biden cabal 

Only you would argue over which turd tastes worse

The good news is Biden has three more years to screw up. 

18 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

Only you would argue over which turd tastes worse

Yeah, you being so enlightened and all 

37 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

Only you would argue over which turd tastes worse

When you are constantly fed shit sandwiches, you make the most of what you got.  Trump was the farthest from the Washington swamp (turds) we had as a choice and it seems 81 million people like the taste of shit.

20 minutes ago, racer254 said:

When you are constantly fed shit sandwiches, you make the most of what you got.  Trump was the farthest from the Washington swamp (turds) we had as a choice and it seems 81 million people like the taste of shit.

160 million.

1 minute ago, motonoggin said:

160 million.

Who would you have elected?

1 minute ago, Rigid1 said:

Who would you have elected?

Bourgeois electoralism won't help us. 

2 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

Bourgeois electoralism won't help us. 

That didn't answer the question

15 minutes ago, Rigid1 said:

That didn't answer the question

Your question presumes that participation in the farce will somehow make a difference. 

I rejected that presumption and now rebuke your feeble attempt to goad me into accepting it.

4 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

Your question presumes that participation in the farce will somehow make a difference. 

I rejected that presumption and now rebuke your feeble attempt to goad me into accepting it.

It did not, I didn't ask who you would vote for I asked who you would elect..There is a difference in that question

Just now, Rigid1 said:

It did not, I didn't ask who you would vote for I asked who you would elect..There is a difference in that question

No there's not lol

Just now, motonoggin said:

No there's not lol

There is, you just must not be able grasp the difference

21 minutes ago, Rigid1 said:

It did not, I didn't ask who you would vote for I asked who you would elect..There is a difference in that question

 weird.

19 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

 weird.

It is very weird an adult doesn't know the difference in the definition of vote and elect..

9 hours ago, Rigid1 said:

Who would you have elected?

Yang would have been a good choice I think, Gabbard as well.

Neal