spin_dry Posted February 15, 2022 Share Posted February 15, 2022 New York Times found not liable in Sarah Palin defamation case Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frostynuts Posted February 15, 2022 Share Posted February 15, 2022 She,s probably still doing ok, know that she is sampling a new rooster. LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted February 15, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 15, 2022 Well this post a little deceiving, and oddly I am not shocked.. So the jury was in deliberations and shocker, the NY judge dismissed the case,..a first to be done while the jury was in deliberations and a complete oddity in our "justice system" I don't know why she is/was going after the NYT, nor do I care,..But what I do care about is our justice system working as it should,..As we are all seeing on TV, NY judges and DA's are not following their oath and letting politics and personal feelings sque their decisions..But as you can see above, The Dem cult is way way out of wack and don't necessarily have a moral compass anymore.. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted February 15, 2022 Share Posted February 15, 2022 The back story is on the same day a Bernie Sanders supporter shot up a bunch of republicans playing soft ball the NYT ran a story stating that the AZ rep Gabby Giffords was shot because of Sarah Palin's rhetoric. So the NYT should have never printed such a foolish story and it is a clear case of slander that an Obama appointed judge proceeded to sabotage. The Judge who dismissed the case while the jury was deliberating was over turned on appeal. Between this and the Project Veritas incident with the NYT i would say the bottom of a birdcage is to good a place for a copy of the times. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 Another grifter fail. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plissken Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 Major win for free speech. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted February 16, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 16, 2022 Yeah nothing sketchy going on there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 2 hours ago, spin_dry said: New York Times found not liable in Sarah Palin defamation case Lies. crooked NY judge 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 22 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Another grifter fail. Nyt is the grifter in this case as most they are involved in . 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 20 minutes ago, Plissken said: Major win for free speech. Lol yeah it's OK to print lies about who is responsible for a mass shooting . 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted February 16, 2022 Author Share Posted February 16, 2022 It’s another left wing hijacking of the judicial system. Unless of course the ball bounces the other way. Then it’s Justice, god dammit. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 12 minutes ago, spin_dry said: It’s another left wing hijacking of the judicial system. Unless of course the ball bounces the other way. Then it’s Justice, god dammit. Think they will do as well with out the pos liberal judge in there case with Veritas? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted February 16, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 16, 2022 Fuck hooked 3 with 1 post in one of their own's threads.. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted February 16, 2022 Author Share Posted February 16, 2022 12 minutes ago, Ez ryder said: Think they will do as well with out the pos liberal judge in there case with Veritas? Are you saying that both the judge and jury were wrong? Both decided to throw out the charge. I'm assuming that you disagree with both. Why? What facts of the case makes you think that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, spin_dry said: Are you saying that both the judge and jury were wrong? Both decided to throw out the charge. I'm assuming that you disagree with both. Why? What facts of the case makes you think that? Judge tossed when Jury was still in deliberations . So there is that over reach Edited February 16, 2022 by Ez ryder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted February 16, 2022 Author Share Posted February 16, 2022 2 minutes ago, Ez ryder said: Judge tossed when Jury was still in deliberations . So there is that over reach Nope. Jury was sequestered. They didn't know about the judge's decision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 Just now, spin_dry said: Nope. Jury was sequestered. They didn't know about the judge's decision. Lmfao ok so in other words the judge decided the case before they came back with a verdict he may not like . 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted February 16, 2022 Author Share Posted February 16, 2022 Just now, Ez ryder said: Lmfao ok so in other words the judge decided the case before they came back with a verdict he may not like . Yep, just another nail in Sarah's case if she seeks appeal. Judge's use that strategy often. Cuts down on frivolous appeals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 1 minute ago, spin_dry said: Yep, just another nail in Sarah's case if she seeks appeal. Judge's use that strategy often. Cuts down on frivolous appeals. WTF are you talking about ? A fucking judge decided a case before a jury had the chance to give its verdict. What fucking diff dose it make if the jury that never had a chance to give its verdict was sequestered or could watch TV? The judge decided the case because he was affrade his opinion would not be the prevailing outcome in a legal case. And the only fucking reason you are OK with this is because of yoir distain for the person who was screwed by the overreach from the bench . But don't worry every one notices 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted February 16, 2022 Author Share Posted February 16, 2022 Just now, Ez ryder said: WTF are you talking about ? A fucking judge decided a case before a jury had the chance to give its verdict. What fucking diff dose it make if the jury that never had a chance to give its verdict was sequestered or could watch TV? The judge decided the case because he was affrade his opinion would not be the prevailing outcome in a legal case. And the only fucking reason you are OK with this is because of yoir distain for the person who was screwed by the overreach from the bench . But don't worry every one notices The only reason you're getting all lathered up is because she's one your own. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 Just now, spin_dry said: The only reason you're getting all lathered up is because she's one your own. No not at all NYT has thers coming soon and they know it . It is bullshit in any case that a judge dismisses the validity of the jury and the whole system as a whole by doing so . It is extremely telling that you see this as ok Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member EvilBird Posted February 16, 2022 Gold Member Share Posted February 16, 2022 3 minutes ago, spin_dry said: The only reason you're getting all lathered up is because she's one your own. Hilarious.....you are nothing but a partisan hack . 29 threads a day on a snowmobile site pushing your "side" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted February 16, 2022 Author Share Posted February 16, 2022 2 minutes ago, Ez ryder said: No not at all NYT has thers coming soon and they know it . It is bullshit in any case that a judge dismisses the validity of the jury and the whole system as a whole by doing so . It is extremely telling that you see this as ok I love it!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted February 16, 2022 Author Share Posted February 16, 2022 1 minute ago, EvilBird said: Hilarious.....you are nothing but a partisan hack . 29 threads a day on a snowmobile site pushing your "side" It gives you something to do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 Just now, spin_dry said: I love it!!!! I know you do . It is ducking pathetic and you deserve to die in a fire because of it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.