Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

CDC has no documented cases of a person reinfected with COVID transmitting the virus to another person.


Recommended Posts

  • Platinum Contributing Member

:news:  If you think they aren't looking for these cases you are fucking crazy.  Trust the CDC?  :lmao:

 

https://www.westernjournal.com/thanks-foia-request-cdc-just-made-biggest-admission-covid-yet/

Is natural or vaccinated immunity better for fighting COVID? The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has offered conflicting evidence on this, which is causing more questions about the efficacy of the vaccine.

Last month, the CDC published a new study that seemed to firmly indicate that immunity from the vaccine is better than natural immunity.

“Unvaccinated people who had survived a previous COVID-19 infection were more than five times more likely to be reinfected with the virus compared to those who were fully vaccinated with the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines,” CBS News reported on the CDC findings.

But there is new evidence that seems to debunk this claim from the CDC.

In response to a Freedom of Information Act request from a lawyer, the CDC admitted that they have not had any documented cases of an unvaccinated individual with natural immunity spreading the virus.

 

But the CDC is not the only place that is collecting data and running studies on COVID.

Recently an Israeli study that has been collecting data from March 1, 2020, to August 14, 2021, published data to show that natural immunity is actually stronger than the immunity gained from the Pfizer vaccine.

“SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees had a 13.06-fold … increased risk for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant compared to those previously infected,” the study concluded.

The Israeli study was several times larger than the CDC’s study that concluded that vaccine immunity was superior.

This Israeli study, coupled with the new admission from the CDC that there have been no recorded cases of those with natural immunity spreading the virus, seems to contradict the CDC’s constant messaging that everyone needs to get vaccinated.

The arguments around vaccines have been so politically charged that it’s natural to begin asking whether the CDC is really as apolitical as it claims.

So far, the CDC has been on the side of those who are calling for vaccine mandates, promoting the vaccine and even incentivizing it.

The CDC has even been campaigning for “vaccine confidence.”

“Strong confidence in COVID-19 vaccines within communities leads to more adults, adolescents, and children getting vaccinated ― which leads to fewer COVID-19 illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths,” the CDC said.

But nearly everything regarding the vaccine now is politically charged. It’s no secret that the greatest battle over the vaccine is political, not scientific. The scientific facts seem to merely be tools in the broader political roil.

Last year, when the vaccine was still being developed, Brookings predicted this politicization.

“And now, as with all aspects of COVID-19, politics has crept into the vaccine conversation in ways that threaten to derail public confidence,” Brookings noted on Oct. 30, 2020.

But it’s not just the politicization that is raising questions.

Those who are hesitant about the vaccine may have good reason after now seeing the CDC double back on itself and conflict with other studies about the vaccine immunity.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member

One would think the CDC would be interested in this data yet this is their webpage on reinfection.  Basically nothing.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Deephaven said:

My neighbor has had it twice.  Both times bad.  Natural protection may be stronger than the shot, but it isn't infallible either.  Neither time did he transmit it to someone else in his household.

Having it twice is very rare, did he think he had it or did he actually test positive both times?

BTW, HHS has an annual budget of 1.2 TRILLION Dollars and trump was cutting their budget.  HHS runs the CDC.  Guess who they were voting for.

Edited by racer254
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
24 minutes ago, Deephaven said:

My neighbor has had it twice.  Both times bad.  Natural protection may be stronger than the shot, but it isn't infallible either.  Neither time did he transmit it to someone else in his household.

But did he really.   Early testing was extremely inaccurate because the PCR test was multiplying the virus exponentially to many times.  

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Highmark said:

But did he really.   Early testing was extremely inaccurate because the PCR test was multiplying the virus exponentially to many times.  

Oh, let’s go ahead and say that if you went to the doctor early on (and maybe now too), you were diagnosed with COVID.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Highmark said:

But did he really.   Early testing was extremely inaccurate because the PCR test was multiplying the virus exponentially to many times.  

Based on the need for a respirator once and super similar problems with the second I would say yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
57 minutes ago, Deephaven said:

Wasn't.

 

56 minutes ago, Deephaven said:

...but is planning a booster now as he doesn't want it again.

So he got the jab after the 2nd infection?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
2 hours ago, Deephaven said:

I haven't seen him in 2 weeks, but said he was going to now after the last time.

So he's not getting a booster but the actual 1st dose of the jab?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Plissken said:

The cdc debunked that.  There isn't  one documented case to prove what you suggested.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Did he get it between the 2 infections?  The CDC doesn't have even one documented case of a repeat Covid case in the unvaxxed.

It's because they didn't collect the data...not because it doesn't happen. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

The cdc debunked that.  There isn't  one documented case to prove what you suggested.

Lol….sure.   Let the class know if and when they debunk this one…..

odds of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 among unvaccinated adults with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection were 5.49-fold higher than the odds among fully vaccinated recipients of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine who had no previous documented infection 

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/pdfs/mm7044e1-H.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

:lol:

Sorry pal.  They would want to amplify this to promote the vax if it held any water.  

No they didn't collect any data because the only narrative that mattered was the Vaccine...I also had a client that had it twice..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...