Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted January 6, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 6, 2021 Bazinga!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 I believe this is a good pick 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teamgreen02 Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 2 minutes ago, f7ben said: I believe this is a good pick Leaps and bounds better than our Minnesota AG anyways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 (edited) 7 minutes ago, teamgreen02 said: Leaps and bounds better than our Minnesota AG anyways. Literal light years better than Sessions or Barr Edited January 6, 2021 by f7ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 9 minutes ago, teamgreen02 said: Leaps and bounds better than our Minnesota AG anyways. He needs to be stoned to death in rice Park Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 (edited) Guess at 68yr old he could be seen as a spring chicken to some Edited January 6, 2021 by Ez ryder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teamgreen02 Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 2 minutes ago, Ez ryder said: He needs to be stoned to death in rice Park Imagine if we had Doug Wardlow instead? Walz unconstitutional lockdowns wouldn't exist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 17 minutes ago, teamgreen02 said: Leaps and bounds better than our Minnesota AG anyways. A rock. A small one, would be better than MN AG. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 He could’ve done a lot worse Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 11 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said: He could’ve done a lot worse Garlands deference yo law enforcement is somewhat troublesome for me but the opinions I read were pretty narrow and somewhat cut and dry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted January 6, 2021 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 6, 2021 (edited) Don’t consider his SCOTUS nomination well then let’s appoint him AG.👍🏼 FU Turtle!🤣 https://www.npr.org/2018/06/29/624467256/what-happened-with-merrick-garland-in-2016-and-why-it-matters-now Edited January 6, 2021 by Jimmy Snacks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 6, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 6, 2021 Poor Amy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 He would have made a decent SCJ and I am sure will be better than the last few AG's including during the Obama admin. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teamgreen02 Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 1 hour ago, Zambroski said: A rock. A small one, would be better than MN AG. Hey, I thought you left your liberal politics back in Duluth? What the hell is happening down there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 Just now, teamgreen02 said: Hey, I thought you left your liberal politics back in Duluth? What the hell is happening down there? Train wreck down here. Right now, hundreds of thousands of ballots are skipping their way out of sight....never to be seen again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F3600 Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 Can't complain, I don't expect he'll be a water boy like Eric Holder was. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teamgreen02 Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 5 minutes ago, F3600 said: Can't complain, I don't expect he'll be a water boy like Eric Holder was. One can hope so. Otherwise, we dodged a bullet on a lifetime appointment to the SC. Guess we will see what he is really like now that he is a politician without the robe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 6, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 6, 2021 (edited) 2 hours ago, f7ben said: I believe this is a good pick Some things ok some not. His history somewhat leans toward LE and govt. Edited January 6, 2021 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 6, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 6, 2021 (edited) Double post. Edited January 6, 2021 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 10 minutes ago, Highmark said: Some things ok some not. His history somewhat leans toward LE and govt. I get that feeling too although the cases that were brought regarding Miranda and Habeas etc were narrow in scope and somewhat cut and dry. I hope as some of the larger more existential questions arise from vast complex cases he moderates on his apparent deference to govt and LE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 6, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 6, 2021 1 minute ago, f7ben said: I get that feeling too although the cases that were brought regarding Miranda and Habeas etc were narrow in scope and somewhat cut and dry. I hope as some of the larger more existential questions arise from vast complex cases he moderates on his apparent deference to govt and LE True. Many case people simply don't understand that the ruling has nothing to do with anything but procedural issues. Doesn't stop them from flying off the handle not understanding that fact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.