motonoggin Posted November 25, 2016 Author Share Posted November 25, 2016 Odd that this logic doesn't translate to Israel. 13 minutes ago, Angry ginger said: to the winners go the spoils the government can and did take whatever they want. Maybe some indian should come and claim your land as theirs cause 300 years ago it was, i'm sure you'd be right there supporting them. This is typical 'might makes right' rhetoric. They used the same kind of rhetoric in Germany in the 30s... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 25, 2016 Author Share Posted November 25, 2016 14 minutes ago, Sludgey said: Why stop at the Sioux? Someone would have occupied those lands before them. Are the Sioux going to give it back to whoever that was? Ask the Israelis... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 4 minutes ago, motonoggin said: Ask the Israelis... Israelis were slaves for many years Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 25, 2016 Author Share Posted November 25, 2016 1 minute ago, Sludgey said: Israelis were slaves for many years So? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 4 minutes ago, motonoggin said: So? Indians never were and honestly contribute nothing to society Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 11 minutes ago, motonoggin said: Odd that this logic doesn't translate to Israel. This is typical 'might makes right' rhetoric. They used the same kind of rhetoric in Germany in the 30s... that rhetoric is how most countries were founded going back thousands of years. Sorry about the indians luck but they lost, they can suck it up, time for the us government to cut the indians off the tit and make them integrate into the rest of the world for their own benefit anyways instead of these shithole reservations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 4 minutes ago, motonoggin said: So? They were there 5 thousand years before the UN said you can have your land back again and fuck Palestine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 25, 2016 Author Share Posted November 25, 2016 1 minute ago, Sludgey said: Indians never were and honestly contribute nothing to society They should have let the pilgrims starve. 1 minute ago, Angry ginger said: that rhetoric is how most countries were founded going back thousands of years. Sorry about the indians luck but they lost, they can suck it up, time for the us government to cut the indians off the tit and make them integrate into the rest of the world for their own benefit anyways instead of these shithole reservations. Now you sound like a 'i know what's best for you' liberal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 Just now, Angry ginger said: that rhetoric is how most countries were founded going back thousands of years. Sorry about the indians luck but they lost, they can suck it up, time for the us government to cut the indians off the tit and make them integrate into the rest of the world for their own benefit anyways instead of these shithole reservations. Progressive Indians know that their society needs to quit being so regressive. liberals also need to quit being so racist to Indians. They're the first ones who constantly scream that societies need to evolve but also get extremely mad when one suggests that Indians need to join modern society. For some reason they hold these people to a lower regard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 25, 2016 Author Share Posted November 25, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 3 minutes ago, motonoggin said: indians want to try to take back this country they are certainly welcome to try Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 Moto doesn't see his own hypocrisy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 Just now, Angry ginger said: indians want to try to take back this country they are certainly welcome to try I welcome it tbh. Sooner the better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 spot on, except i don't agree with this statement. evidently the author doesn't realize the stupidity of many americans.... "Why do they want to avoid providing an environmental impact statement? According to Kennedy, it's because this would mean providing the American people with a full cost-benefit analysis of the pipeline, which will immediately lose all public support when people see how much they're losing and how little they're gaining. "They would have to show how many jobs we are producing, where is the oil going," Kennedy said, which would show Americans that only a few dozen jobs will be created and all the oil exported overseas. "What this project is going to do is enrich a few billionaires… but it’s going to impoverish the rest of the country. And it’s going to injure humanity profoundly." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 25, 2016 Author Share Posted November 25, 2016 Just now, Angry ginger said: indians want to try to take back this country they are certainly welcome to try Will you take their side? After all, they occupied this land much more recently than the Israelis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 25, 2016 Author Share Posted November 25, 2016 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: spot on, except i don't agree with this statement. evidently the author doesn't realize the stupidity of many americans.... "Why do they want to avoid providing an environmental impact statement? According to Kennedy, it's because this would mean providing the American people with a full cost-benefit analysis of the pipeline, which will immediately lose all public support when people see how much they're losing and how little they're gaining. "They would have to show how many jobs we are producing, where is the oil going," Kennedy said, which would show Americans that only a few dozen jobs will be created and all the oil exported overseas. "What this project is going to do is enrich a few billionaires… but it’s going to impoverish the rest of the country. And it’s going to injure humanity profoundly." Everyone who relies on water for life has a stake in this, regardless of ownership of the surface soil. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 3 minutes ago, motonoggin said: Will you take their side? After all, they occupied this land much more recently than the Israelis. why would I take the side of those who lost to my ancestors. sorry about their luck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 1 minute ago, motonoggin said: Everyone who relies on water for life has a stake in this, regardless of ownership of the surface soil. true, but you seem to have forgotten the country is full of dipshits. dipshits who'd be ok with a leaky pipeline on their own property, nevermind a "safe" one elsewhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 4 minutes ago, motonoggin said: Will you take their side? After all, they occupied this land much more recently than the Israelis. Well since the Vikings were here before the pilgrims maybe it should be the Danes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 25, 2016 Author Share Posted November 25, 2016 3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: true, but you seem to have forgotten the country is full of dipshits. dipshits who'd be ok with a leaky pipeline on their own property, nevermind a "safe" one elsewhere. As long as it's done 'for the good of the economy' some of these guys would go along with strip mining ancient forests and bulldozing ancient cities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 Every heard of an oil water separator Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 25, 2016 Author Share Posted November 25, 2016 1 minute ago, Momorider said: Every heard of an oil water separator Yes. And? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 53 minutes ago, motonoggin said: Yes. And? Stock up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted November 25, 2016 Author Share Posted November 25, 2016 1 minute ago, Momorider said: Stock up You're a fuckin moron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 3 minutes ago, motonoggin said: You're a fuckin moron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.