I mean I cant see an atom , am I supposed to just believe that massive energy can be released from something microscopic?

How am I supposed to know who to believe?

Scientists tell me why 100 megatons of energy can be released from something the size of a coffee can....

But religious people tell me that's the power of god exploding from the warhead?

Or are the videos just fake and atomic energy is a make believe story like the round earth or galaxies and stars???

I'm so confused , I don't know who to trust anymore?????

Edited January 27, 20205 yr by f7ben

4 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said:

So do memes like this touch you inside?  Do they spark some sort internal trigger that makes you think they're cure?  Just wondering...

Satan wants you to just kill plants ok 

6 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

Satan wants you to just kill plants ok 

You don't believe in Satan.  Why should I? 

8 hours ago, AKIQPilot said:

You don't believe in Satan.  Why should I? 

Anyone who does, does so without demonstrable evidence.

Neal

1 minute ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

Anyone who does, does so without demonstrable evidence.

Neal

Ahhh.....havent you seen an eclipse , or how about that chick shaking under the sheet from coronavirus

All satan

2 minutes ago, f7ben said:

Ahhh.....havent you seen an eclipse , or how about that chick shaking under the sheet from coronavirus

All satan

Buss wouldn't watch the Seth Andrews Satanic Panic video I posted but has time for a 3+ hour conspiracy theory video on the 14 shooters of JFK...

Neal

1 hour ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

Anyone who does, does so without demonstrable evidence.

Neal

kinda like those who believe with absolute certainty that the big bang created the universe.

1 hour ago, frenchy said:

kinda like those who believe with absolute certainty that the big bang created the universe.

Well the big bang didn't create the universe, it's the label of the model we use to describe the early moments of the universe.

We also have demonstrable evidence that supports the big bang model, uniformity, background radiation, observation of expansion, ect.  Those items are demonstrable, where as uncorroborated stories from a book are not so much.

Neal

1 minute ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

Well the big bang didn't create the universe, it's the label of the model we use to describe the early moments of the universe.

We also have demonstrable evidence that supports the big bang model, uniformity, background radiation, observation of expansion, ect.  Those items are demonstrable, where as uncorroborated stories from a book are not so much.

Neal

they are part of an accepted theory, nothing more.

8 minutes ago, frenchy said:

they are part of an accepted theory, nothing more.

Bingo.  Not sure where the disconnect here is but, it seems that other’s die hard, unwavering beliefs and accepted theories within their peer group seem to be just plain wrong!

Scientific and religious theories can intersect.  This is fact.  Anybody that doesn’t think so knows nothing about either.

 

35 minutes ago, frenchy said:

they are part of an accepted theory, nothing more.

The science is settled though.

3 hours ago, frenchy said:

they are part of an accepted theory, nothing more.

Exactly what more do you expect them to be?

A theory is a model of reality that explains the facts it contains.  What higher graduation point do you propose for these evidences to get to?

Neal

2 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said:

The science is settled though.

Science is never settled, this is a crude misnomer that shows ignorance of how science operates.

Neal

1 minute ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

Science is never settled, this is a crude misnomer that shows ignorance of how science operates.

Neal

IF YOU CANT MAKE AN EARTY IN THE LAB HOW DO YOU KNOW HOW IT WAS MADE

YOU WERENT THERE TO SEE IT !!!!!

Just now, f7ben said:

IF YOU CANT MAKE AN EARTY IN THE LAB HOW DO YOU KNOW HOW IT WAS MADE

YOU WERENT THERE TO SEE IT !!!!!

Damn tootin'!

Neal

33 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

Exactly what more do you expect them to be?

A theory is a model of reality that explains the facts it contains.  What higher graduation point do you propose for these evidences to get to?

Neal

all that can be shown is that a big bang occurred. it's role in shaping the universe, or solar system, is still widely unknown. But the science community in their infinite arrogance, which has repeatedly shown itself throughout history, have decided the facts show that  this was the beginning. They do not.

 

lug flick away....

I'll bet you not one of you love your children.  

27 minutes ago, frenchy said:

all that can be shown is that a big bang occurred. it's role in shaping the universe, or solar system, is still widely unknown. But the science community in their infinite arrogance, which has repeatedly shown itself throughout history, have decided the facts show that  this was the beginning. They do not.

 

lug flick away....

Beginning of what?

18 minutes ago, Highmark said:

I'll bet you not one of you love your children.  

If god can do anything can he make a stone he cant lift derp derp derp

Fucking idiot

1 minute ago, f7ben said:

Beginning of what?

don't play dumb.

1 minute ago, frenchy said:

don't play dumb.

It was the beginning of this phase of expansion.

I've never seen anyone claim the big bang proves what was before it

Scientist are liars,  have faith in Jesus and be grateful Noah built that bomb ass ark to repopulate the world.  

1 minute ago, Angry ginger said:

Scientist are liars,  have faith in Jesus and be grateful Noah built that bomb ass ark to repopulate the world.  

evangelicals who believe the literal interpretation of the bible are the dumbest people on the planet.

4 minutes ago, frenchy said:

all that can be shown is that a big bang occurred. it's role in shaping the universe, or solar system, is still widely unknown. But the science community in their infinite arrogance, which has repeatedly shown itself throughout history, have decided the facts show that  this was the beginning. They do not.

 

lug flick away....

The “Big Bang theory”, while a widely peer reviewed, accepted and a reasonable theory, is still just that.

Trying to enforce that theory with some idiotic statement about atoms in a laboratory or making a planet using a Bunsen burner is just fucking retarded.  I mean, just plain idiotic.

43 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

Exactly what more do you expect them to be?

A theory is a model of reality that explains the facts it contains.  What higher graduation point do you propose for these evidences to get to?

Neal

Wut?  A theory is a group of ideas that are designed to try and explain the principle of a concept.  While it certainly contains “models of reality” and “facts” and presents a valid explanation, many are still just theoretical.  Many large scale theories (stars, solar systems, black holes, ToolKits, etc) aren’t actually considered scientific law because they cannot be accurately recreated and observed to enforce their full theory.

Scientific laws can be experimented and observed (atoms, gravity, time and space, etc).

24 minutes ago, Highmark said:

I'll bet you not one of you love your children.  

I’ve been known to fade in and out.  

 

5 minutes ago, f7ben said:

It was the beginning of this phase of expansion.

I've never seen anyone claim the big bang proves what was before it

It's just a theory dude.

That's all folks.

2 minutes ago, frenchy said:

evangelicals who believe the literal interpretation of the bible are the dumbest people on the planet.

Not sure you are going to find anybody to disagree to this.  Maybe MC.