ckf Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 10 minutes ago, Dave said: Jesus christ learn how to quote ffs I find it easier to just ignore his posts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 33 minutes ago, ckf said: I find it easier to just ignore his posts You can give example after example to disprove his posts and like a good lefty, he will never ever believe them. And if they are factual, they just come back with more stupid questions to justify their support of a crook. It's pathetic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 On 10/22/2016 at 10:16 AM, Mileage Psycho said: How dumb do you have to be to not believe Grover Norquist, the founder and president of Americans for Tax Reform when he gives due credit to the POTUS for cutting spending? Again start at the 5 minute mark and watch it through the 5:40 mark, and that goes for everyone else like racer, etc. 25 minutes ago, racer254 said: You can give example after example to disprove his posts and like a good lefty, he will never ever believe them. And if they are factual, they just come back with more stupid questions to justify their support of a crook. It's pathetic. Sounds like you are talking about yourself and I say good for you, and I say this because self acknowledgement of your deficiencies could mean that there is hope for you 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 3 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said: Sounds like you are talking about yourself and I say good for you, and I say this because self acknowledgement of your deficiencies could mean that there is hope for you It's sucks to be correct so many times on this forum. But most everything predicted comes true when dealing with the left. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Rosenberg Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 (edited) 2 hours ago, Sleepr2 said: And qear goes down in flames......... or like a flamer ....... or some shit Edited October 23, 2016 by Sal Rosenberg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sear Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 " You can give example after example to disprove his posts and like a good lefty, he will never ever believe them. " r2 A reply is not necessarily an example. And belief is not the issue. The issue is whether your reply actually accomplishes what you present it for. I don't have stats on it, but I refuted the two ostensible examples I reviewed, found reason for doubt in each; reason which I gather has not been addressed here. FYI the legal standard in our law courts across the nation is the "reasonable doubt" standard. It may be a pretty low standard. BUT !! At least it's a standard; a standard embraced by our governments for centuries. What standard do you apply? Insulting conservatives by calling us liberals, and then pretend you're half as rational, persuasive, or factually accurate as I am? - pathetic - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Remember when Warren exposed hillary for flip flopping on a bankruptcy bill for money? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 11 minutes ago, sear said: " You can give example after example to disprove his posts and like a good lefty, he will never ever believe them. " r2 A reply is not necessarily an example. And belief is not the issue. The issue is whether your reply actually accomplishes what you present it for. I don't have stats on it, but I refuted the two ostensible examples I reviewed, found reason for doubt in each; reason which I gather has not been addressed here. FYI the legal standard in our law courts across the nation is the "reasonable doubt" standard. It may be a pretty low standard. BUT !! At least it's a standard; a standard embraced by our governments for centuries. What standard do you apply? Insulting conservatives by calling us liberals, and then pretend you're half as rational, persuasive, or factually accurate as I am? - pathetic - There are a few people here that only have the talking points of their side as the basis for a debate. Those few do not acknowledge any facts put forth by their opposition. Are you trying to be one of those? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sear Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 #33 I don't view it as a single mission. In college I was taught the three reasons to address a group are: - to inquire - to inform, or - to persuade. My own agenda adds: - to entertain or amuse. My OVERWHELMING criterion is merely to tell the truth. Again, the exception is an obvious joke punchline. But that should be easily distinguishable from a lie. Partisanship doesn't interest me. Again, I don't wish to publish my résumé here at this time. But my résumé does not leave room for doubting the sincerity of my interest in the welfare of the whole People of the United States, or my devotion to objective truth, in the cases where it exists. I shall make a standing offer, for perpetuity: if I post in error, please correct me. PLEASE correct me! If I thank you for the correction / clarification, we can dismiss it as my human error. If I contradict the correction, and adhere to a lie; it will forever after brand me a liar; and disqualify any further comment I might post. Deal? All you have to do is prove me wrong ONCE! Good luck with that! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 2 hours ago, ckf said: I find it easier to just ignore his posts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 50 minutes ago, sear said: #33 I don't view it as a single mission. In college I was taught the three reasons to address a group are: - to inquire - to inform, or - to persuade. My own agenda adds: - to entertain or amuse. My OVERWHELMING criterion is merely to tell the truth. Again, the exception is an obvious joke punchline. But that should be easily distinguishable from a lie. Partisanship doesn't interest me. Again, I don't wish to publish my résumé here at this time. But my résumé does not leave room for doubting the sincerity of my interest in the welfare of the whole People of the United States, or my devotion to objective truth, in the cases where it exists. I shall make a standing offer, for perpetuity: if I post in error, please correct me. PLEASE correct me! If I thank you for the correction / clarification, we can dismiss it as my human error. If I contradict the correction, and adhere to a lie; it will forever after brand me a liar; and disqualify any further comment I might post. Deal? All you have to do is prove me wrong ONCE! Good luck with that! youre a fucking idiot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckf Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 4 minutes ago, f7ben said: youre a fucking idiot did you just figure that out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Just now, ckf said: did you just figure that out? I've had an inkling all along but its just recently been confirmed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmo Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 7 minutes ago, ckf said: did you just figure that out? He's already been caught in a lie. One day he's putting down sleds, the next he's a Polaris guy. Zero credability. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckf Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Just now, Edmo said: He's already been caught in a lie. One day he's putting down sleds, the next he's a Polaris guy. Zero credability. I remember him saying that he didn't have a sled when he first got here. Never read where he was a Poo guy because I just skip over his posts. He's been given a tutorial by a couple of us on how to quote, but still pretends that he doesn't know how. Obviously it's someone that's been here before that is using a different screen name to hide his identity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 1 minute ago, ckf said: I remember him saying that he didn't have a sled when he first got here. Never read where he was a Poo guy because I just skip over his posts. He's been given a tutorial by a couple of us on how to quote, but still pretends that he doesn't know how. Obviously it's someone that's been here before that is using a different screen name to hide his identity. Complete faggot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 3 hours ago, Ez ryder said: If a Republican had said this it would be repeated every day in the media after recent events. What a pompous ass hole. How funny that some are comfortable with and praising Obama's murderous rampage, because the media tells them it is fine now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Maybe it's wince since he lost all credibility with his real account Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckf Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 34 minutes ago, f7ben said: Complete faggot Any guesses on who it is? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 35 minutes ago, f7ben said: Complete faggot Tried to give him a fair shot when he got here, but yeah . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 6 minutes ago, ckf said: Any guesses on who it is? I asked him how he got here . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckf Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 15 minutes ago, Cold War said: I asked him how he got here . I remember that. Didn't he say that he found it by searching 'current events forum'? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 10 minutes ago, ckf said: I remember that. Didn't he say that he found it by searching 'current events forum'? He did. Just happened upon it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 1 hour ago, ckf said: Any guesses on who it is? Spill it 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckf Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 8 minutes ago, Momorider said: Spill it I have no idea. IP address doesn't match any other member Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.