Dave Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 Just now, 1jkw said: Between the 2 you, you have an IQ of maybe 80. Whats that say about you then.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 Compared to the loose security of the Trump White House the Clinton e-mails are a nothingburger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 1 minute ago, STUMP said: I can see it happening after the collusion thing has run its course..... In reality Hillary will essentially be beaten to death anyway once no collusion has been proven once and for all. I hope it does. In the interim quit crying about how long the Russia investigation is taking, the Clinton investigations have gone on years longer, Trey Gowdy etc. I don't think collusion is even illegal, unless you hire someone to hack voting machines, or steal ballots things like that. It is clear that the Trump campaign did have contact, worked with, (colluded} with Russian operatives to help them win the election, no different than hiring a firm to help you win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 17 minutes ago, STUMP said: Whats that say about you then.... Double the 2 of you put together. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 Just now, 1jkw said: I hope it does. In the interim quit crying about how long the Russia investigation is taking, the Clinton investigations have gone on years longer, Trey Gowdy etc. I don't think collusion is even illegal, unless you hire someone to hack voting machines, or steal ballots things like that. It is clear that the Trump campaign did have contact, worked with, (colluded} with Russian operatives to help them win the election, no different than hiring a firm to help you win. Is that you slinger? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 Just now, 1jkw said: Double the 2 of you put together. So your dum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 1 minute ago, STUMP said: Is that you slinger? No. Are you saying there was no contact? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted March 22, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 22, 2019 Just now, STUMP said: Is that you slinger? Right, that last sentence..omg..Clear?? wtf is he on???... oh yea,, TDS 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 1 minute ago, STUMP said: So your dum Can't even spell and you call someone else dumb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 Just now, 1jkw said: No. Are you saying there was no contact? Time for you to go play with mach z not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 1 minute ago, Rigid1 said: Right, that last sentence..omg..Clear?? wtf is he on???... oh yea,, TDS There is no doubt the campaign talked to Russian operatives, doesn't make it illegal. The only tds is the Trump defense Syndrome. There were meetings it is a fact, doesn't mean it was illegal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 2 hours ago, Highmark said: Nope no double standard. I can't imagine the shit a full blown Mueller type investigation would come up with. The 756-page group of new documents, revealed Thursday as part of a transparency lawsuit by Judicial Watch, seemingly contradicted Clinton's insistence under oath in 2015that she had turned over all of her sensitive work-related emails to the State Department, and included a slew of classified communications on everything from foreign policy to State Department personnel matters. Additionally, according to the email dump, Clinton chatted with former U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair about classified foreign policy matters before she was sworn in, aided the application of at least one State Department applicant who was connected to her daughter, Chelsea, and apparently met with Putin-aligned Georgian oligarch Bidzina Ivanishvili before he became prime minister on a staunchly pro-Russian platform -- and with reported help from a Russian interference operation. Ivanishvili pointedly did not criticize Putin during his campaign, despite Putin's invasion of Georgia years earlier -- and in 2012, Ivanishvili made headlines for refusing to meet with Clinton unless it was a one-on-one sitdown. Clinton's discussions with Blair included a classified 2011 conversation on foreign policy, and another classified, redacted 2011 conversation concerning a "speech." Clinton also apparently discussed job-related topics with Blair on January 16, 2009 -- while George W. Bush was still president but after the Senate Foreign Relations Committee had approved her for the job. In one email thread with the subject line "Re: Gaza," dated January 16, 2009, Blair said he wanted to have a matter "resolved before Tuesday," apparently referring to Obama's inauguration. Clinton replied: “Tony – We are finally moving and I am looking forward to talking w you as soon as I’m confirmed, tomorrow or Wednesday at the latest. Your emails are very helpful so pls continue to use this address, hr15@att.blackberry.net." Meanwhile, according to the documents, Retired Army Gen. Jack Keane sent Clinton a heavily redacted, classified email concerning Iraq policy, seemingly in 2009 -- on a topic so urgent that Keane noted he had tried to call Clinton personally before sending it. Separately, two email chains showed the apparently close coordination between the State Department and the Clinton Foundation, which has long been accused by Republicans of operating essentially as a corrupt "pay-to-play" operation that effectively sold access to the Obama administration. Donations to the Clinton Foundation plummeted after Clinton's 2016 election loss. In one email thread, top Clinton aides at the State Department, including Huma Abedin, coordinated a trip to Haiti with Clinton Foundation officials, including Clinton Foundation Director of Advance John Zimmerebner. Bill and Hillary Clinton were headed to Haiti to promote the Caracol Industrial Park, a $300M project funded by U.S. taxpayers through USAID that was heavily promoted to investors by the Clinton Foundation. Slate later called the park a "disappointment by any measure," noting it had no discernible positive impact on Haiti's economy and created tens of thousands fewer jobs than anticipated. And, Clinton Foundation employee Sidney Blumenthal sent Clinton a now-heavily redacted proposal from a former CIA officer concerning improvised-explosive devices, which Blumenthal called a "terrific project." Blumenthal told Clinton the CIA officer had been “unable to break through the bureaucracy with" the proposal. In closed-door testimony last year, former FBI special agent Peter Strzok acknowledged that the Justice Department "negotiated" an agreement with Clinton's legal team that ensured the FBI did not have access to emails on her private servers relating to the Clinton Foundation, even as they probed her handling of classified information. In a particularly striking January 2009 email uncovered by Judicial Watch, Blumenthal, citing sources, told Clinton that "Jewish institutional leaders" were working to derail President Obama's appointment of George Mitchell as Special Envoy to the Middle East. Citing the same sources, Blumenthal warned Clinton that "every one of your conversations and communications with Bibi Netanyahu flows directly and instantly back to top Jewish leadership ... You should, of course, assume that nothing involving him is private." Blumenthal, attaching a memo titled "Good Cop, Bad Cop," said Mitchell was "politically vulnerable" because he was of “Arab descent," and was facing attacks "carefully scripted" by top Jewish leaders. Blumenthal advised Clinton and Obama to bring aboard a "bad cop" who was a “political appointee, Jewish, considered a true friend of Israel" to help resist the attacks. Blumenthal invoked former Secretary of State James Baker, saying he was "savaged by Jewish organizations, in the Jewish press and among the phalanx of neoconservative media" for taking a tough stance on Israel that "stunned the Israelis." "You are always in danger of being maneuvered into Baker's position," Blumenthal wrote to Clinton. "Mitchell is even more immediately in danger." Blumenthal added: "Bibi and the Jewish leadership should be expected to use political means, including outsourcing personal attacks, to counter moves the administration seeks in any peace process or initiating any negotiations. As you know, Bibi is deeply connected to political networks in the US-media, Jewish groups, Republican leaders, and right-wing Christian right organizations." https://www.foxnews.com/politics/clinton-in-newly-revealed-classified-emails-discussed-secret-comms-channel-with-israel But according to stupid fucks MC, Clinger, and retardrider trump is the criminal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 22 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Compared to the loose security of the Trump White House the Clinton e-mails are a nothingburger. Wow. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 5 minutes ago, STUMP said: Time for you to go play with mach z not. Nice deflection. That's all you got, could have answered the question in the time it took to type that. But you know you that won't help your case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 Just now, 1jkw said: Nice deflection. That's all you got, could have answered the question in the time it took to type that. But you know you that won't help your case. Youve made my case clear...and undermined yours in the process. Just like you did the last time.... .I thank you for that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 22, 2019 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 22, 2019 (edited) 11 minutes ago, 1jkw said: There is no doubt the campaign talked to Russian operatives, doesn't make it illegal. The only tds is the Trump defense Syndrome. There were meetings it is a fact, doesn't mean it was illegal. Russian operatives. Define "operative." You mean officials? Edited March 22, 2019 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 15 minutes ago, 1jkw said: No. Are you saying there was no contact? 14 minutes ago, STUMP said: Time for you to go play with mach z not. 7 minutes ago, 1jkw said: Nice deflection. That's all you got, could have answered the question in the time it took to type that. But you know you that won't help your case. welcome to my world. dumb as a stump refusing to answer such an easy question. because he knows the answer will do him in Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 (edited) 1 minute ago, Highmark said: Russian operatives. Define "operative." tied to the russian government. what next? define "tied"? one of your many welcher excuses, exposed... Edited March 22, 2019 by Snoslinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 19 minutes ago, 1jkw said: No. Are you saying there was no contact? ttt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 22, 2019 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 22, 2019 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: tied to the russian government. what next? define "tied"? one of your many welcher excuses, exposed... After the election you jackass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 1 minute ago, Highmark said: After the election you jackass. wut? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 Slinger to the rescue!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 5 minutes ago, STUMP said: Youve made my case clear...and undermined yours in the process. Just like you did the last time.... .I thank you for that. You made nothing, just proved you are a hack. There were meetings, that is a fact, does adoption ring a bell. Digging up dirt on your opponent is sop and not illegal. You can meet with, collude, conspire, plan, scheme, with anyone you want, it's not illegal. Unless you ask someone to do something illegal, and so far there is no proof of anything illegal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 Just now, 1jkw said: You made nothing, just proved you are a hack. There were meetings, that is a fact, does adoption ring a bell. Digging up dirt on your opponent is sop and not illegal. You can meet with, collude, conspire, plan, scheme, with anyone you want, it's not illegal. Unless you ask someone to do something illegal, and so far there is no proof of anything illegal. Derp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 3 minutes ago, STUMP said: Slinger to the rescue!!! a or b? a) yes b) no Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.