T1R9sledder Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 9 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said: Could you imagine rubbing dinks with people like snot over junk like this NO!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 I've been clear. I dont care how he us defeated as long as he doesnt get confirmed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 The FBI should do an investigation, and the outcome is the outcome no matter which way it goes. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 20 hours ago, BOHICA said: Can’t wait till this gets on DU... responses are going to be epic How about FOX NEWS Quote Avenatti releases graphic Kavanaugh allegations, calls for new delay http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/26/avenatti-releases-graphic-kavanaugh-allegations-calls-for-new-delay.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 2 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said: The FBI should do an investigation, and the outcome is the outcome no matter which way it goes. Kavanaugh should just withdraw....he's compromised and does not deserve this appointment 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 Just now, f7ben said: Kavanaugh should just withdraw....he's compromised and does not deserve this appointment Innocent until found guilty, we are a country of laws and rules. Although I did find his goody two shoes choirboy claims on the TV interview as kind of hard to believe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 1 minute ago, Mileage Psycho said: Innocent until found guilty, we are a country of laws and rules. Although I did find his goody two shoes choirboy claims on the TV interview as kind of hard to believe. I say let these woman testify under oath. Then start subpoenaing witnesses first of which being his rapist buddy Mark Judge. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 33 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said: The FBI should do an investigation, and the outcome is the outcome no matter which way it goes. This isn’t in the FBI’s pervue fuck you’re dumb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 26, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 26, 2018 51 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said: She was raped, but not by him. Just says she seen him once. Doesn’t name the actual rapists these are the people behn is aligning himself with Each successive accuser distances themselves further away. The abortion debate brings out the nuts. On the left accusations they held for 36 years. On the right nuts that kill abortion doctors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 The only thing that gives me pause that this is truly a hack job is Avenatti being involved. Either way, there should be an investigation by the FBI and the hearing should be rescheduled until it’s completion. To start discrediting woman for no reason than politics is shit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 7 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: The only thing that gives me pause that this is truly a hack job is Avenatti being involved. Either way, there should be an investigation by the FBI and the hearing should be rescheduled until it’s completion. To start discrediting woman for no reason than politics is shit. Avenatti had the Stormy Daniels/Trump thing right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 Just now, Mileage Psycho said: Avenatti had the Stormy Daniels/Trump thing right. Dude is a hack artist opportunist. He didn’t have anything right, he just had it put in his lap. Not like he broke the thing wide open. Got his fame and like the greasy fuck he is, won’t let go. Taking his word on anything is a dangerous proposition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 Just now, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: Dude is a hack artist opportunist. He didn’t have anything right, he just had it put in his lap. Not like he broke the thing wide open. Got his fame and like the greasy fuck he is, won’t let go. Taking his word on anything is a dangerous proposition. What has he been wrong on? Until the guy stumbles you have to think he has it right, he's a pretty smart guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hwytohell Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 (edited) This dem played mess can only end one way , with a line up of Kavanaugh and his friend Judge with their penis's exposed for the women that have accused them of sexual misconduct to identify for positive proof . Just like the movie " Porky's " . The clown club senate members can pick who will be " Ms.Balbricker " Edited September 26, 2018 by hwytohell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 26, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 26, 2018 1 hour ago, Mileage Psycho said: The FBI should do an investigation, and the outcome is the outcome no matter which way it goes. Its not in the FBI's jurisdiction. You honestly think the left lets him go even if the FBI clears his name? How does the FBI investigate 36 yo allegations? To some extent the country is already here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T1R9sledder Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 30 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said: What has he been wrong on? Until the guy stumbles you have to think he has it right, he's a pretty smart guy. He might be pretty smart but he oozzes sleaze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 12 minutes ago, Highmark said: Its not in the FBI's jurisdiction. You honestly think the left lets him go even if the FBI clears his name? How does the FBI investigate 36 yo allegations? To some extent the country is already here. bush ordered it for anita hill, trump could do the same here. it took 3 days. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 23 minutes ago, Highmark said: Its not in the FBI's jurisdiction. You honestly think the left lets him go even if the FBI clears his name? How does the FBI investigate 36 yo allegations? To some extent the country is already here. Precedent, Anita Hill. precedent noun prec·e·dent | \ ˈpre-sə-dənt \ Definition of Precedent (Entry 2 of 2) 1: an earlier occurrence of something similar 2a: something done or said that may serve as an example or rule to authorize or justify a subsequent act of the same or an analogous kinda verdict that had no precedent b: the convention established by such a precedent or by long practice 3: a person or thing that serves as a model https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/precedent Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 26, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 26, 2018 4 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: bush ordered it for anita hill, trump could do the same here. it took 3 days. Because there was jurisdiction because they were both Federal employee's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 26, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 26, 2018 (edited) 1 minute ago, Mileage Psycho said: Precedent, Anita Hill. precedent noun prec·e·dent | \ ˈpre-sə-dənt \ Definition of Precedent (Entry 2 of 2) 1: an earlier occurrence of something similar 2a: something done or said that may serve as an example or rule to authorize or justify a subsequent act of the same or an analogous kinda verdict that had no precedent b: the convention established by such a precedent or by long practice 3: a person or thing that serves as a model https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/precedent Just now, Highmark said: Because there was jurisdiction because they were both Federal employee's. Both Fed employee's when said allegation took place. But change the rules anyway. Edited September 26, 2018 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 1 minute ago, Highmark said: Because there was jurisdiction because they were both Federal employee's. You're grasping, in any event it would be transparent if the FBI investigates, what's the rush? It's a lifetime appointment and now it all has to be done on a fast track, the man should be thoroughly vetted. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 so can trump order the investigation, yes or no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 Been around here for a few years now. And if you want to be on the wrong side of a media driven narrative, just follow wince’s lead. He gets it wrong every single time 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 26, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 26, 2018 2 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said: You're grasping, in any event it would be transparent if the FBI investigates, what's the rush? It's a lifetime appointment and now it all has to be done on a fast track, the man should be thoroughly vetted. I'm grasping? The FBI already said it wouldn't investigate the Ford claims. Answer this Vince. Kavanaugh was on a list of SC nominee's since Romney was running in 2012. He was announced early on Trumps short list during the campaign. Kavanaugh was nominated on July 9th. Feinstein received her letter on July 30th. Why all the delays? Why wait until AFTER the hearings? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 10 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said: You're grasping, in any event it would be transparent if the FBI investigates, what's the rush? It's a lifetime appointment and now it all has to be done on a fast track, the man should be thoroughly vetted. The hurry is to get him in before the mid terms ya dummy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.