Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Drug executive: It's a 'moral requirement' to charge patients the highest price


Recommended Posts

Drug executive: It's a 'moral requirement' to charge patients the highest price

In the category of saying the quiet parts out loud, consider this statement by Nirmal Mulye, the chief executive of drug company Nostrum Laboratories: “I think it is a moral requirement to make money when you can ... to sell the product for the highest price.”

Mulye was responding to questions posed by the Financial Times about his quadrupling the price of an essential antibiotic to $2,392 per bottle. The drug, nitrofurantoin, is used to treat urinary tract infections. It has been on the market since 1953 and is listed by the World Health Organization as an essential medicine for “basic healthcare systems.”

In his interview with the Financial Times published Tuesday, Mulye defended Martin Shkreli, the former drug company CEO who became the face of the industry’s profiteering in 2015 when he jacked up the price of a generic anti-parasitic drug needed by HIV patients by more than 5,000%. “I agree with Martin Shkreli that when he raised the price of his drug he was within his rights because he had to reward his shareholders,” Mulye told the FT. (Shkreli is currently serving a prison term on fraud charges unrelated to the price hike.)

Mulye’s remarks drew a rebuke from Scott Gottlieb, commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration. “There’s no moral imperative to price gouge and take advantage of patients,” Gottlieb tweeted after the FT interview appeared. He said his agency would “continue to promote competition so speculators and those with no regard to public health consequences can’t take advantage of patients who need medicine.”

Click for the rest:

http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-drug-prices-20180911-story.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said:

It makes perfect sense for a psychopath. 

Sociopaths are usually a lot smarter... How are you an exec and think that’s ok to say to the media? I get it if you beleive that, but to say it out loud outside of private? Silly. Fuck him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, steve from amherst said:

1954? Why are there not 3 competitors making a generic?

Could be many factors. Risk. The older drug may have side effects that could lead to lawsuits. Lead time. Another company has to show that thier genetic provides a minimum and maximum level of effectiveness with minimal side effects. Cost. The competition will simply crash the cost of the drug when competition arrives.  

The only real solution is realistic cost controls. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ActionfigureJoe said:

Could be many factors. Risk. The older drug may have side effects that could lead to lawsuits. Lead time. Another company has to show that thier genetic provides a minimum and maximum level of effectiveness with minimal side effects. Cost. The competition will simply crash the cost of the drug when competition arrives.  

The only real solution is realistic cost controls. 

Well, that or worker ownership of the means of production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

Well, that or worker ownership of the means of production.

That’s always a possibility. But that would mean human health care could no longer be sold like pork bellies in a marketplace with corporate profit margins reaching 30-40%. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said:

That’s always a possibility. But that would mean human health care could no longer be sold like pork bellies in a marketplace with corporate profit margins reaching 30-40%. 

That's gonna make some job creators sad...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is he wrong?  his duty is to the shareholders not patients.  Healthcare is a market that the government must intervene in at some point when they pull their balls out of the healthcare industries purse.  This includes both the drug manufacturers and the point of care providers excess,   but they lobby almost as well as the MIC to keep the gravy train going.   Funny thing is the insurance companies take the most heat yet end of the day are the least responsible for the issue,  sure they add a cost to the system but they are the only ones trying to hold the drug companies and healthcare providers accountable at this point..  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Angry ginger said:

is he wrong?  his duty is to the shareholders not patients.  Healthcare is a market that the government must intervene in at some point when they pull their balls out of the healthcare industries purse.  This includes both the drug manufacturers and the point of care providers excess,   but they lobby almost as well as the MIC to keep the gravy train going.   Funny thing is the insurance companies take the most heat yet end of the day are the least responsible for the issue,  sure they add a cost to the system but they are the only ones trying to hold the drug companies and healthcare providers accountable at this point..  

Good post.  But yes, he’s wrong.if he thinks it’s “morally correct”.  Poor choice of words.  He should have not said anything.  We all know what their moral standards really are.  The whole system is about as morally bankrupt as they come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Angry ginger said:

is he wrong?  his duty is to the shareholders not patients.  Healthcare is a market that the government must intervene in at some point when they pull their balls out of the healthcare industries purse.  This includes both the drug manufacturers and the point of care providers excess,   but they lobby almost as well as the MIC to keep the gravy train going.   Funny thing is the insurance companies take the most heat yet end of the day are the least responsible for the issue,  sure they add a cost to the system but they are the only ones trying to hold the drug companies and healthcare providers accountable at this point..  

No one disagrees with that. It’s just a stupid thing to say. He doesn’t need to say it like he did. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Highmark said:

4 widely available generics or alternatives.   Dude's probably simply trying to spike stock price thru the media attention.

https://www.iodine.com/drug/nitrofurantoin/alternatives

I love how "they're just trying to make money" is a justification one day, and a condemnation the next...

:lol:

*Nike hires Kap*

"Pfft. They're just trying to make money"

*Drug company gouges sick people*

"But they're just trying to make money"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...