Snake Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 Warren’s “Accountable Capitalism Act” would require that corporations that earn more than $1 billion in revenue a year (note “revenue,” not “profits”) would need a federal “charter” in order to operate. This charter would obligate these companies to consider all “stakeholders,” not just shareholders, when making decisions. The bill would also require these corporations to permit employees to elect 40 percent of the company’s board of directors; a super majority of 75 percent of directors and shareholders would have to approve political donations. (Gee, I wonder if somebody will propose something similar for unions?) Shareholders would be permitted to sue the company if they felt its actions were driven purely by profit and did not reflect the desires of its many “stakeholders.” • https://reason.com/blog/2018/08/15/elizabeth-warren-plans-to-destroy-capita 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 9 minutes ago, Snake said: Warren’s “Accountable Capitalism Act” would require that corporations that earn more than $1 billion in revenue a year (note “revenue,” not “profits”) would need a federal “charter” in order to operate. This charter would obligate these companies to consider all “stakeholders,” not just shareholders, when making decisions. The bill would also require these corporations to permit employees to elect 40 percent of the company’s board of directors; a super majority of 75 percent of directors and shareholders would have to approve political donations. (Gee, I wonder if somebody will propose something similar for unions?) Shareholders would be permitted to sue the company if they felt its actions were driven purely by profit and did not reflect the desires of its many “stakeholders.” • https://reason.com/blog/2018/08/15/elizabeth-warren-plans-to-destroy-capita Ahhh....socializm. It's guuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuud!!!!!!!! She's in my "Top 5" list I want to see on stage for the primary debates. It's gonna look like the retarded Village People up there! *yeah...we know which one she is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted August 16, 2018 Author Share Posted August 16, 2018 1 minute ago, Zambroski said: Ahhh....socializm. It's guuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuud!!!!!!!! She's in my "Top 5" list I want to see on stage for the primary debates. It's gonna look like the retarded Village People up there! *yeah...we know which one she is. Inch by inch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 fucking SMH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T1R9sledder Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 1 minute ago, Angry ginger said: fucking SMH The question is "would you hit it"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 Hahahaha. This is a great platform to ensure the blue wave come November. Poor Libs. So lost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted August 16, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 16, 2018 I just got back from working in her town. What a fucking shitshow . Hope I never have to go back there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 1 minute ago, T1R9sledder said: The question is "would you hit it"? hell no. She's right there with Hillary for me on the complete cunt list Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted August 16, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 16, 2018 2 minutes ago, T1R9sledder said: The question is "would you hit it"? Only so I could pull out and blow it right in her fucking face ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 5 minutes ago, T1R9sledder said: The question is "would you hit it"? 3 minutes ago, Angry ginger said: hell no. She's right there with Hillary for me on the complete cunt list You boys know, neither were completely hideous when they were younger. Liberals just don't age well. It's got to be all the hatred and biggotry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T1R9sledder Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 2 minutes ago, Angry ginger said: hell no. She's right there with Hillary for me on the complete cunt list Concur 1 minute ago, steve from amherst said: Only so I could pull out and blow it right in her fucking face ! You're brave or crazy...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 Sounds like your union Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T1R9sledder Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 7 minutes ago, Zambroski said: You boys know, neither were completely hideous when they were younger. Liberals just don't age well. It's got to be all the hatred and biggotry. Some accuracy in that statement ..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 50 minutes ago, Snake said: Warren’s “Accountable Capitalism Act” would require that corporations that earn more than $1 billion in revenue a year (note “revenue,” not “profits”) would need a federal “charter” in order to operate. This charter would obligate these companies to consider all “stakeholders,” not just shareholders, when making decisions. The bill would also require these corporations to permit employees to elect 40 percent of the company’s board of directors; a super majority of 75 percent of directors and shareholders would have to approve political donations. (Gee, I wonder if somebody will propose something similar for unions?) Shareholders would be permitted to sue the company if they felt its actions were driven purely by profit and did not reflect the desires of its many “stakeholders.” • https://reason.com/blog/2018/08/15/elizabeth-warren-plans-to-destroy-capita It's almost as if she was influenced by they way corporations are set up in Germany. How very BMW-y of her! https://global.handelsblatt.com/companies/why-german-corporate-governance-is-so-different-892389 CGC_BMW_AG_Dez_2017_English.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 Im sure this will go over well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted August 16, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 16, 2018 Just now, Nazipigdog said: Im sure this will go over well. I think she should run on that platform. That and more gun control. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hwytohell Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 Back in the day before she was totally exposed as a lying fraud political squaw, she was on PBS and CSPAN many times talking about the dembanksters in our country and what they have done to the average Joe's , she made some sense in her talking points then. Today she is junior club member of the same dembanksters she railed about . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 Seems like she has every American in mind instead of the 1% 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T1R9sledder Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 15 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Seems like she has every American in mind instead of the 1% You keep thinking that..... 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 What's the argument against this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted August 16, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 16, 2018 21 minutes ago, XC.Morrison said: What's the argument against this? ITs not the gvmts job to tell corperations how to run themselves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 She has done to open up small business in Massachusetts to federal contracts than any senator in the country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 1 minute ago, steve from amherst said: ITs not the gvmts job to tell corperations how to run themselves. Like the UPS union? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted August 16, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 16, 2018 Just now, Mainecat said: Like the UPS union? A union isn't the gvmt. If UPS wants to negotiate with a union that is their business. Just as if construction co's want to negotiate with unions that is also their business. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildboer Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 27 minutes ago, XC.Morrison said: What's the argument against this? For one it's still capitalism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.