Zambroski Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 6 minutes ago, SnowRider said: Then you should post a response instead of your usual worthless drivel They are responses. Are you not understanding the insults? From now on, I shall call you "dweeble 1". Please make a note. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted May 31, 2016 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted May 31, 2016 1 minute ago, Zambroski said: They are responses. Are you not understanding the insults? From now on, I shall call you "dweeble 1". Please make a note. So tell the class how trickled on is working in Kansas.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oleroule Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 2 minutes ago, SnowRider said: So tell the class how trickled on is working in Kansas.... Damn Dweeble, you think this crap "lesson" of yours has students? And apparently you are the teacher? How very liberalistic of you. However, we may not be worthy of your education. Maybe the Kansas educational system has a place for you. Yes, please go there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 (edited) Kansas has the lowest unemployment rate in 14 years at 4.1% Wages in Kansas have increased by 7% since 2011. BTW, Kansas must like him so why do you care? Edited May 31, 2016 by racer254 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted May 31, 2016 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted May 31, 2016 I'm curios why cutting taxes as Laffer and Friends (The R's) claim has not resulted in higher tax revenue as they claim Instead there is major forum Butthurt and deflection . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 Must be all the dem tax dodgers ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 (edited) Hmm, Seems someone is mistaken with the information that he keeps spewing Edited May 31, 2016 by racer254 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 3 minutes ago, SnowRider said: I'm curios why cutting taxes as Laffer and Friends (The R's) claim has not resulted in higher tax revenue as they claim Instead there is major forum Butthurt and deflection . And we're all curious why you think shit in Kansas needs to be explained or justified on a snowmobile forum in which not a single member lives remotely close to that issue and cares even less. And how the correlation between this forums said "deflection and butthurt" matter at all in the aforementioned justification and explanation. Listen Dweeble, in my backyard pond right now, there is a mother duck and six baby chicks swimming around with her. Every chick is the size of a golfball and as such, probably have an equally proportioned pea size brain. Every one of them possess more intuitiveness and own a higher intelligence level than I have witnessed from you and that other fucking retard liberal I've seen on here (Dweeble 2). And if for one second I thought those little ducklings may be less equipped mentally than you I'd go out and stomp them to death in what could only be described as a mercy killing. It's not too un similar than what your parents undoubtedly tried to do about you. Perhaps they should have heated the clothes hanger first. The scrambling wasn't quite enough because here you are, "learning us" in your "class". Ughhh..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted May 31, 2016 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted May 31, 2016 3 minutes ago, Zambroski said: And we're all curious why you think shit in Kansas needs to be explained or justified on a snowmobile forum in which not a single member lives remotely close to that issue and cares even less. And how the correlation between this forums said "deflection and butthurt" matter at all in the aforementioned justification and explanation. Listen Dweeble, in my backyard pond right now, there is a mother duck and six baby chicks swimming around with her. Every chick is the size of a golfball and as such, probably have an equally proportioned pea size brain. Every one of them possess more intuitiveness and own a higher intelligence level than I have witnessed from you and that other fucking retard liberal I've seen on here (Dweeble 2). And if for one second I thought those little ducklings may be less equipped mentally than you I'd go out and stomp them to death in what could only be described as a mercy killing. It's not too un similar than what your parents undoubtedly tried to do about you. Perhaps they should have heated the clothes hanger first. The scrambling wasn't quite enough because here you are, "learning us" in your "class". Ughhh..... Hey dipshit - you're new here and don't have a clue as to what we discuss . It's best you troll the site and look like a fool than post and erase all doubt HCS is for pussies like you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted May 31, 2016 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted May 31, 2016 (edited) Doe Dumber Kansas tax revenue has come up short once again. The Department of Revenue announced Tuesday that total state revenues for February were $56.7 million under projections lowered just four months ago to adjust for worrisome economic trends. Individual income tax receipts were $27 million short of projections. Sales tax revenue was $12.3 million short. Revenue Secretary Nick Jordan said a downturn in the oil and gas industry was dragging down the economies of several Midwestern states including Kansas. Democratic legislative leaders said the income tax cuts Gov. Sam Brownback pushed through the Republican-controlled Legislature in 2012 remain at the root of the state’s revenue and budget problems. As he has in response to previous shortfalls, Brownback insisted his tax cuts were not to blame. “This is an economic problem, not a tax policy problem,” he said in a statement issued minutes after the revenue numbers were announced. “These numbers reflect a declining national and regional economy.” Brownback said he will oppose any effort to adjust the tax cuts despite calls from some influential Republicans to restore taxes on the pass-through incomes of more than 300,000 business owners. The governor said he would instead focus on “managing spending.” To that end, he ordered an immediate 3 percent cut in the budgets of the state’s Board of Regents universities, requiring them to reduce their approved budgets by $17 million with only four months remaining in the fiscal year. In an opinion piece published recently by several Kansas newspapers and broadcast Tuesday on Kansas Public Radio, former Kansas Budget Director Duane Goossen said even though Brownback sold the tax cuts as a way to stimulate the state economy, his real goal may have been “squeezing down” state government. “If you truly bought into the argument that giant tax cuts would lead to prosperity without hurting schools and highways, you’ve been had,” Goossen wrote. “Meanwhile, those wanting Kansas to spend less regardless of the consequences have met success.” Goossen, a former Republican legislator, served as budget director for 12 years under governors of both political parties, starting with Republican Gov. Bill Graves. The lower-than-expected revenue numbers will present an immediate challenge to lawmakers returning Wednesday to the Statehouse after a brief mid-session break. Prior to the break lawmakers approved a series of spending reductions and one-time fund transfers to erase a projected $200 million shortfall in the fiscal year 2017 budget, which takes effect July 1. But those measures won’t be enough to cover the February revenue shortfalls or any that may occur in subsequent months this fiscal year. The preliminary budget plan also doesn’t include any of the additional money that likely will be needed to satisfy the recent decision by the Kansas Supreme Court declaring the state’s existing school funding formula unconstitutional. Jim McLean is executive editor of KHI News Service in Topeka, a partner in the Heartland Health Monitor http://www.hayspost.com/2016/03/02/brownback-tax-cuts-not-to-blame-for-kansas-revenue-shortfall/ Edited May 31, 2016 by SnowRider Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 4 minutes ago, SnowRider said: Hey dipshit - you're new here and don't have a clue as to what we discuss . It's best you troll the site and look like a fool than post and erase all doubt HCS is for pussies like you Are you excusing me from your "class"? Thank you. Please consider letting the rest go too, they stopped listening to you a long time ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snoughnut Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 5 minutes ago, SnowRider said: Hey dipshit - you're new here and don't have a clue as to what we discuss . It's best you troll the site and look like a fool than post and erase all doubt HCS is for pussies like you That's ironic, you accomplish that with every post you make. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted May 31, 2016 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted May 31, 2016 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Zambroski said: Are you excusing me from your "class"? Thank you. Please consider letting the rest go too, they stopped listening to you a long time ago. You need to observe and learn before you desperately spout off in an attempt to fit in . FYI - this thread will continue to be discussed until someone in here proves to me trickled on economics works and/or the R's change their economic philosophy. If you don't like it - STFU and don't read the thread. Is that clear dipshit? Edited May 31, 2016 by SnowRider Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 4 minutes ago, SnowRider said: You need to observe and learn before you desperately spout off in an attempt to fit in . FYI - this thread will continue to be discussed until someone in here proves to me trickled on economics works and/or the R's change their economic philosophy. If you don't like it - STFU and don't read the thread. Is that clear dipshit? So much frustration! Poor little liberal whiner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted May 31, 2016 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted May 31, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 Here are the facts: http://www.ksrevenue.org/stats.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oleroule Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 (edited) 2 hours ago, SnowRider said: You need to observe and learn before you desperately spout off in an attempt to fit in . FYI - this thread will continue to be discussed until someone in here proves to me trickled on economics works and/or the R's change their economic philosophy. If you don't like it - STFU and don't read the thread. Is that clear dipshit? it worked for kennedy and reagan. you get an 'f' for your knowledge of economics history. Edited May 31, 2016 by oleroule Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted May 31, 2016 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted May 31, 2016 1 minute ago, oleroule said: it worked for kennedy and reagan. you get an 'f' for your knowledge of economics history. Did Ronny triple the debt and open up the flood gates for wealth to flow to the top? Willard by 12..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oleroule Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 (edited) 5 minutes ago, SnowRider said: Did Ronny triple the debt and open up the flood gates for wealth to flow to the top? Willard by 12..... sticking to what YOU were referring to...kennedy and reagan...success or no? Edited May 31, 2016 by oleroule Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 2 hours ago, snoughnut said: That's ironic, you accomplish that with every post you make. What are you even doing here? I thought you were above all of his tomfoolery? Yet here you are engaging him... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 15 minutes ago, Anler said: What are you even doing here? I thought you were above all of his tomfoolery? Yet here you are engaging him... He loves SnowRider, it's a man love thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snoughnut Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 1 hour ago, Anler said: What are you even doing here? I thought you were above all of his tomfoolery? Yet here you are engaging him... 1 hour ago, Mileage Psycho said: He loves SnowRider, it's a man love thing. How cute, Snow Rider's butt buddies to the rescue. I have 23 posts, I'm really engaged alright. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.