Whiskey Tango Foxtrot Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/02/22/ms-13-murders-prompted-gop-reps-bill-that-would-strip-us-citizenship-from-foreign-born-gang-members The bill from U.S. Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.) — the “Protecting our Communities from Gang Violence Act” — would revoke naturalized citizenship from anyone who participates in gang activity either 10 years before or 10 years after taking the U.S. citizenship oath, the paper said. In the wake of growing violence and highly publicized murders courtesy of the likes of MS-13, a Republican lawmaker wants to fight back by stripping American citizenship from foreign-born gang members, the Washington Examiner reported. The El Salvador-based MS-13 has gained a sinister reputation in recent years. Police told the Examiner that MS-13 gang members have killed 17 people in Suffolk County, New York — Zeldin’s back yard — since January 2016. How did an immigrant-rights group react to Zeldin’s proposal? “This bill is shameless political posturing,” Steven Choi, executive director of the New York Immigration Coalition, told the Washington Times. “It will actually cripple public safety, while demonizing Long Island’s thousands of hard-working immigrants.” 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot Posted February 24, 2018 Author Share Posted February 24, 2018 Just now, Whiskey Tango Foxtrot said: “It will actually cripple public safety, while demonizing Long Island’s thousands of hard-working immigrants.” These people aren't "hard-working immigrants" The bill specifically stated gang members! Removing gang members from the community would "cripple public safety"??? Only in the mind of a Dem could either of these statements be considered, rational thought!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 The alt left are slitting their own throats again 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 “The American people can just deal with all the issues and suffer until they agree to accept our political agenda unconditionally!!” -DNC Beta-Cucks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 I am more concerned with right wing adult gangs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 Just now, Mainecat said: I am more concerned with right wing adult gangs Clearly. Among thousands of other scary issues in your world. Expired mayonnaise, dust bunnies, pebbles in the grass, right and left sock identifiers, etc... 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01mxz800 Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 8 minutes ago, Mainecat said: I am more concerned with right wing adult gangs 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 i don't see a problem with this, as long as the definition of "gang activity" doesn't go overboard and it's obvious as fuck the clown is indeed a gang member. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 this statement sounds like BS to me... “CBP apprehended them, knew they were MS-13 gang members, and they processed and disbursed them into our communities,” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot Posted February 24, 2018 Author Share Posted February 24, 2018 5 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: this statement sounds like BS to me... “CBP apprehended them, knew they were MS-13 gang members, and they processed and disbursed them into our communities,” Could be total BS, it is the media report after all. They have to have that triggered fear factor to get any attention nowadays. Happens from both sides. The main point of the article can't be argued by any rational person though, IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 so i read another "blaze" article linked in that op. obviously a biased website, designed to get simpletons who don't have any critical thought process, all riled up. simpletons like the ones who frequent this site. there's no mention of present day gang members that came in during the bush admin. or came in as a result of the policy that was created by the bush admin. no mention of all the things that some of the teens that came into the country under that policy have done. it's just focus on the ones that turned bad, blame the dems for it, accuse dems of not caring, and make up BS like obama knew a bunch of teens were in a murderous gang and let them in anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
washedupmxer Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 dems are emotional thinkers, its friggen gross Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 2 minutes ago, washedupmxer said: dems are emotional thinkers, its friggen gross Yeah but family values Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot Posted February 24, 2018 Author Share Posted February 24, 2018 4 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: so i read another "blaze" article linked in that op. obviously a biased website, designed to get simpletons who don't have any critical thought process, all riled up. simpletons like the ones who frequent this site. there's no mention of present day gang members that came in during the bush admin. or came in as a result of the policy that was created by the bush admin. no mention of all the things that some of the teens that came into the country under that policy have done. it's just focus on the ones that turned bad, blame the dems for it, accuse dems of not caring, and make up BS like obama knew a bunch of teens were in a murderous gang and let them in anyway This was my point. I'm not a "simpleton", I have the ability to read past the partisan politics. Yes, the blaze is a conservative website, no different than the MSNBC CNN of the other side. Again, I posted it to report the message of the article, not to blame Dems. They do enough damage to their party themselves. However, the response they gave, the one I quoted, I hope even you could see the idiocy there. No? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 3 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Yeah but family values Gang members are pro-family. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 4 minutes ago, Whiskey Tango Foxtrot said: This was my point. I'm not a "simpleton", I have the ability to read past the partisan politics. Yes, the blaze is a conservative website, no different than the MSNBC CNN of the other side. Again, I posted it to report the message of the article, not to blame Dems. They do enough damage to their party themselves. However, the response they gave, the one I quoted, I hope even you could see the idiocy there. No? yes it is, alot different. and the title of your thread says alot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot Posted February 24, 2018 Author Share Posted February 24, 2018 2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: yes it is, alot different. and the title of your thread says alot. Obviously you know where I stand on the issues. Of course I'm going to title it towards my bias, and to stir the pot... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 7 minutes ago, Whiskey Tango Foxtrot said: Obviously you know where I stand on the issues. Of course I'm going to title it towards my bias, and to stir the pot... nobody else here does that.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 25 minutes ago, washedupmxer said: dems are emotional thinkers, its friggen gross are you and lilly still in your garanimal pyjamas, eating fruitty pebbles after your sleep over last night? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 I dont agree at all with creating a legal vehicle for removing someones citizenship. Our Justice Dept , US Intell and LEO agencies have proven to be 100% corrupt and inept. Fuck giving them the ability to revoke citizenship. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 16 minutes ago, f7ben said: I dont agree at all with creating a legal vehicle for removing someones citizenship. Our Justice Dept , US Intell and LEO agencies have proven to be 100% corrupt and inept. Fuck giving them the ability to revoke citizenship. I agree with the “10 year after” part being stupid. If we made them a citizen based on proper vetting in the first place, then what they do after falls under our system of justice (whatever that means now). And if we make them citizens, then revoke it, where the fuck do they go now? The moon? Just dumb. Or do we think their former country will take them back? Nonsense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 1 minute ago, Zambroski said: I agree with the “10 year after” part being stupid. If we made them a citizen based on proper vetting in the first place, then what they do after falls under our system of justice (whatever that means now). And if we make them citizens, then revoke it, where the fuck do they go now? The moon? Just dumb. Or do we think their former country will take them back? Nonsense. Exactly ....the solution to the problem is proper vetting in the first place......not more laws to fight problems the govt is creating in the first place Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 (edited) 8 hours ago, Snoslinger said: yes it is, alot different. and the title of your thread says alot. really the founder of the Blaze had a top rated show on your beloved unquestionably trusted and CNN for 3 yrs . and may I ad is no fan of trump .but you would not know that with your head firmly planted up Don Lemon's sloppy star fish Edited February 24, 2018 by Ez ryder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 6 hours ago, Zambroski said: I agree with the “10 year after” part being stupid. If we made them a citizen based on proper vetting in the first place, then what they do after falls under our system of justice (whatever that means now). And if we make them citizens, then revoke it, where the fuck do they go now? The moon? Just dumb. Or do we think their former country will take them back? Nonsense. well a shit load will be Russian and Hmong . Mc wont know how to Handel this one ok we get it Mexicans have a right to be hear as do stinky Somalia people even if they are in gangs but those Russian and gooks extremely torn . pretty sure it is a full depends worth of pondering if mother jones has no thoughts on this for him to adopt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.