f7ben Posted June 30, 2017 Author Share Posted June 30, 2017 1 minute ago, ICEMAN! said: So the USIC and these cyber security firms CrowdStrike,[18][19] Fidelis Cybersecurity,[19][20]Fireeye's Mandiant,[19] SecureWorks,[21]ThreatConnect,[22] Trend Micro,[23] are all in on the conspiracy? maybe they didnt examine the docs comparatively in the same forensic manner as the expert hacker that revealed the differences ? or maybe they were all paid to come to a conclusion ...who knows Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 4 minutes ago, f7ben said: maybe they didnt examine the docs comparatively in the same forensic manner as the expert hacker that revealed the differences ? or maybe they were all paid to come to a conclusion ...who knows Or maybe your story is bullshit and just fell apart Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted June 30, 2017 Author Share Posted June 30, 2017 (edited) 2 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: Or maybe your story is bullshit and just fell apart not at all do a little research instead of swallowing the lies http://g-2.space/ Edited June 30, 2017 by f7ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 2 minutes ago, f7ben said: not at all What does kimdotcom have to say about it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted June 30, 2017 Author Share Posted June 30, 2017 Just now, ICEMAN! said: What does kimdotcom have to say about it? he is about 10000x more reliable source than the USIC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 1 minute ago, f7ben said: he is about 10000x more reliable source than the USIC His last big scoop really went far Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 1 hour ago, ICEMAN! said: You've lost it dude wikileaks has never been disproven. Ever. For anything. They are the most trustworthy source on anything they have released. And their vetting process has been second to none. Those are facts sir. Besides, any brain capable of independent thought can smell the bullshit on this. And the fact that it keeps blowing up in the faces of the liars only reinforces that fact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted June 30, 2017 Author Share Posted June 30, 2017 2 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: His last big scoop really went far Was he allowed to come to the US and give his evidence and testimony???? If not why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 1 minute ago, Anler said: wikileaks has never been disproven. Ever. For anything. They are the most trustworthy source on anything they have released. And their vetting process has been second to none. Those are facts sir. Besides, any brain capable of independent thought can smell the bullshit on this. And the fact that it keeps blowing up in the faces of the liars only reinforces that fact. they have a way of twisting words though, and ben is too gullible to see it. like the "it wasn't the Russian gov or a state" that hacked the e-mails, and ben takes that as "no Russia involvement, period". same with assange statement about the dangers leakers have. he reads that as "seth rich was murdered by Hillary". it's really bizarre. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 as far as your second statement analer... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 14 minutes ago, Anler said: wikileaks has never been disproven. Ever. For anything. They are the most trustworthy source on anything they have released. And their vetting process has been second to none. Those are facts sir. Besides, any brain capable of independent thought can smell the bullshit on this. And the fact that it keeps blowing up in the faces of the liars only reinforces that fact. What does wikileaks have to do with bens latest conspiracy theory? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 5 hours ago, f7ben said: https://www.intellihub.com/new-information-suggests-guccifer-2-0-leak-was-a-dnc-ruse-fabricated-by-warren-flood/ The metadata embedded within the Wikileaks emails, when compared to the metadata released by ‘Guccifer 2.0,’ doesn’t match up and is not the same (i.e. the files released by Guccifer 2.0 are not the same files released by Wikileaks). What the metadata actually shows is that the Wikileaks files clearly were taken from DNC Research Director Lauren Dillon’s computer and not Warren Floods who used Microsoft Office to create the document. Guccifer 2.0 originated from inside the DNC ......fact 2 hours ago, ICEMAN! said: What does wikileaks have to do with bens latest conspiracy theory? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 Well, the Intel community never got the server, so there's that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 4 minutes ago, Snake said: Well, the Intel community never got the server, so there's that. And they are never going to. There's probably more people besides the Clinton's who don't want that public... Hence the "private server"... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 2 hours ago, Anler said: Says who? The chump that wrote that conspiracy theory article Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriftBusta Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 8 hours ago, Carlos Danger said: I don't care what Trump says I still want to see Mika's ta tas. I'm glad someone finally boiled the issue down. 7 hours ago, Rod Johnson said: Wait... does this mean the DNC is Russian? Pretty much Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member Stephen Hawking Posted July 1, 2017 Gold Member Share Posted July 1, 2017 Said this a long time ago. Any hacker worth half a damn can make it look like he's working from your house if he wanted to. Russian hacking tools can be had by anyone, they are not proof. When is this giant waste of tax money going to end? It's apparently ok when the dems want to spend it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted July 1, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 1, 2017 .7 Momo Iceman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted July 1, 2017 Author Share Posted July 1, 2017 A DERP DERP DERP DERP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 1, 2017 Share Posted July 1, 2017 15 minutes ago, f7ben said: A DERP DERP DERP DERP No..that's how he sees it. HIS SIDE ARE ALL WINNERS!!!!!! Can't be beaten! Well, except for when Russia get's involved...but short of them....WINNING!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.