Mainecat Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 If it was anyone else accused of molesting, raping or assaulting anyone we would be arrested, charged and investigated. So why the special treatment? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 Is this a serious thread? Are you being serious? Seriously? Nawwwww..... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted September 19, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 19, 2018 Because when someone comes forward 37 yrs later folks have many doubts if it ever happened. Especially when they come forward at what appears to be the perfect time. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 3 minutes ago, Mainecat said: If it was anyone else accused of molesting, raping or assaulting anyone we would be arrested, charged and investigated. So why the special treatment? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted September 19, 2018 Author Share Posted September 19, 2018 2 minutes ago, steve from amherst said: Because when someone comes forward 37 yrs later folks have many doubts if it ever happened. Especially when they come forward at what appears to be the perfect time. There is lots of evidence, witnesses and a lie detector test. Again if anyone here did it they would be cuffed, charged and given a court date to prove their innocence. I ask a simple question again......why not in this case? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted September 19, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 19, 2018 1 minute ago, Mainecat said: There is lots of evidence, witnesses and a lie detector test. Again if anyone here did it they would be cuffed, charged and given a court date to prove their innocence. I ask a simple question again......why not in this case? What lots of evidence is that you speak of? please list Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 Just now, Mainecat said: There is lots of evidence, witnesses and a lie detector test. Again if anyone here did it they would be cuffed, charged and given a court date to prove their innocence. I ask a simple question again......why not in this case? There is no evidence. LD’s aren’t admissible evidence because they are proven to be inaccurate. There are ZERO credible witnesses and a pretty much discredited accuser along with a party that can’t seem to help their own credibility. Then, take in the time and timing.... How’s that you bumbling liver spot? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hwytohell Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 Wonder if Dr. Ford still has the blue dress ?? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 11 minutes ago, Mainecat said: If it was anyone else accused of molesting, raping or assaulting anyone we would be arrested, charged and investigated. So why the special treatment? First Bill Clinton....... Second we are talking about actions done by and to minors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted September 19, 2018 Author Share Posted September 19, 2018 5 minutes ago, Zambroski said: There is no evidence. LD’s aren’t admissible evidence because they are proven to be inaccurate. There are ZERO credible witnesses and a pretty much discredited accuser along with a party that can’t seem to help their own credibility. Then, take in the time and timing.... How’s that you bumbling liver spot? WOW that’s fake news. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted September 19, 2018 Author Share Posted September 19, 2018 1 minute ago, Carlos Danger said: First Bill Clinton....... Second we are talking about actions done by and to minors. Nice deflection. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 No crime was even committed if there was the statue of limitations has long past FAKENEWSMAINECUNT is an pant shiting imbecile Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted September 19, 2018 Author Share Posted September 19, 2018 FYI there is no statute of limitations in Maryland. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted September 19, 2018 Author Share Posted September 19, 2018 (edited) 1 minute ago, Momorider said: No crime was even committed if there was the statue of limitations has long past FAKENEWSMAINECUNT is an pant shiting imbecile Read above Edited September 19, 2018 by Mainecat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 Just now, Mainecat said: Read below. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 6 minutes ago, Mainecat said: WOW that’s fake news. Sure is! ...in librul wurld!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hwytohell Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 My understanding is that the FBI will not investigate a local law enforcement sexual assault claim . The Accuser and her dem paid mouth piece need to file a complaint with the local , county or state law enforcement agency that would have jurisdiction . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted September 19, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 19, 2018 7 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Nice deflection. Why deflection? You said anyone else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEFF Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 I accuse @maincat of raping my mind with unbelievable bullshit. See how that works? ExceptI have proof. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 21 minutes ago, Mainecat said: If it was anyone else accused of molesting, raping or assaulting anyone we would be arrested, charged and investigated. So why the special treatment? If you were accused of some that took place 36 years ago you wouldn't be Arrested, Charged, Or investigated. It's outside the limits of they could prosecute Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 5 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said: First Bill Clinton....... Second we are talking about actions done by and to minors. bill clinton isn't about to be voted into the SC. while the "charge" of this isn't all that important, as it was so long ago, it's the idea that we as a country would allow this judge be on the SC. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted September 19, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 19, 2018 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: bill clinton isn't about to be voted into the SC. while the "charge" of this isn't all that important, as it was so long ago, it's the idea that we as a country would allow this judge be on the SC. Why , you want to stop a vote because of something that probably didn't happen? Its nothing but a delay tactic. Hoping to delay it until after the midterms. By christmass this story will be forgotton about. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hwytohell Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 (edited) 29 minutes ago, Mainecat said: If it was anyone else accused of molesting, raping or assaulting anyone we would be arrested, charged and investigated. So why the special treatment? keith ellison Edited September 19, 2018 by hwytohell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: bill clinton isn't about to be voted into the SC. while the "charge" of this isn't all that important, as it was so long ago, it's the idea that we as a country would allow this judge be on the SC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 2 minutes ago, steve from amherst said: Why , you want to stop a vote because of something that probably didn't happen? Its nothing but a delay tactic. Hoping to delay it until after the midterms. By christmass this story will be forgotton about. it needs to be investigated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.