Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

The Sociopath-In-Chief Strikes Again


Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, SnowRider said:

The full court press is being orchestrated by Dump himself.👍. Your deflections, excuses, and continual ignorance optimize your own stupidity.  Now take a step back and realize you're as fucked up as Dump :lol:    

You’re jumping to conclusions again. I’d like to see the entire conversation. You’re cherry picking one line and running with it. Such a simpleton.

Edited by Edmo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

can you fucking imagine the hate and butthurt from the rwws had Obama said, or done, a fraction of these things?

 

It wouldnt be a fraction of yours and other libs on display here on a daily basis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

can you fucking imagine the hate and butthurt from the rwws had Obama said, or done, a fraction of these things?

 

Dave is Canadian and has no influence here in political threads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, BEANPOLE DAVE said:

It wouldnt be a fraction of yours and other libs on display here on a daily basis.

we listened to you nimwits cry and spew hatred about the stupidest things for 8 fucking years. now you're mad because we ridicule relevant things? paleez

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

we listened to you nimwits cry and spew hatred about the stupidest things for 8 fucking years. now you're mad because we ridicule relevant things? paleez

Is that the same eight years where the left blamed everything on Bush?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

we listened to you nimwits cry and spew hatred about the stupidest things for 8 fucking years. now you're mad because we ridicule relevant things? paleez

Still waiting for this...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Edmo said:

What’s obvious is the full court press to make trump look bad. Being the good little sheep you are you bought in hook line and sinker. Atta boy! 

 

What's obvious is that Trump stepped into all this on his own, he was asked a question about his contacts with Gold Star families and it lead him into talking about past presidents and General Kelly's son, and please note that the subject of General Kelly's son is something that the Kelly family has wanted to keep private.

Trump has zero respect for anyone and what there feelings might be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said:

What's obvious is that Trump stepped into all this on his own, he was asked a question about his contacts with Gold Star families and it lead him into talking about past presidents and General Kelly's son, and please note that the subject of General Kelly's son is something that the Kelly family has wanted to keep private.

Trump has zero respect for anyone and what there feelings might be.

Liberals feeling are hurt all the time regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
5 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said:

What's obvious is that Trump stepped into all this on his own, he was asked a question about his contacts with Gold Star families and it lead him into talking about past presidents and General Kelly's son, and please note that the subject of General Kelly's son is something that the Kelly family has wanted to keep private.

Trump has zero respect for anyone and what there feelings might be.

Why even ask the question in the first place.   I agree Trump didn't handle this well but IMHO its between the POTUS and families, nobody else.   If the families want to talk about it more power too them they've more than earned the right to express gratefulness or displeasure with how its handled.

The media could give a shit about a fallen soldiers family, they just want to make Trump look bad and that is disgusting.  His ego puts himself in a bad place at times but I don't buy for a second the man doesn't care about soldiers or their families. 

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/02/01/trump-makes-unannounced-trip-to-honor-fallen-navy-seal.html

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Why even ask the question in the first place.   I agree Trump didn't handle this well but IMHO its between the POTUS and families, nobody else.   If the families want to talk about it more power too them they've more than earned the right to express gratefulness or displeasure with how its handled.

The media could give a shit about a fallen soldiers family, they just want to make Trump look bad and that is disgusting.  His ego puts himself in a bad place at times but I don't buy for a second the man doesn't care about soldiers or their families. 

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/02/01/trump-makes-unannounced-trip-to-honor-fallen-navy-seal.html

he was asked about why no mention of the troops killed in niger for several weeks. that's what started all this, and in trump fashion he got pissed and tried to steer the topic away from himself. not only is the guy a sly little fucking asshole, he's a dumb one as well.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
46 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Why even ask the question in the first place.   I agree Trump didn't handle this well but IMHO its between the POTUS and families, nobody else.   If the families want to talk about it more power too them they've more than earned the right to express gratefulness or displeasure with how its handled.

The media could give a shit about a fallen soldiers family, they just want to make Trump look bad and that is disgusting.  His ego puts himself in a bad place at times but I don't buy for a second the man doesn't care about soldiers or their families. 

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/02/01/trump-makes-unannounced-trip-to-honor-fallen-navy-seal.html

 

10 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

he was asked about why no mention of the troops killed in niger for several weeks. that's what started all this, and in trump fashion he got pissed and tried to steer the topic away from himself. not only is the guy a sly little fucking asshole, he's a dumb one as well.

 

Damned if he does damned if he doesn't.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Highmark said:

Why even ask the question in the first place.   I agree Trump didn't handle this well but IMHO its between the POTUS and families, nobody else.   If the families want to talk about it more power too them they've more than earned the right to express gratefulness or displeasure with how its handled.

The media could give a shit about a fallen soldiers family, they just want to make Trump look bad and that is disgusting.  His ego puts himself in a bad place at times but I don't buy for a second the man doesn't care about soldiers or their families. 

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/02/01/trump-makes-unannounced-trip-to-honor-fallen-navy-seal.html

Because it is job of the press to ask our public servants questions, and if you think Trump gives a fuck about anybody but himself you need to have your head examined.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
5 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said:

Because it is job of the press to ask our public servants questions, and if you think Trump gives a fuck about anybody but himself you need to have your head examined.

 

You can have an ego the size of NYC and still care about people.  I'd say we probably have some on here.

http://ijr.com/2015/11/461306-these-5-acts-of-kindness-reveal-theres-more-to-donald-trump-than-just-his-celebrity-persona/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mainecat said:

My in laws have Canadian citizenship. What’s your point Dave?

I could be an american citizen if I wanted to through my marriage to an american....anything else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Highmark said:

You can have an ego the size of NYC and still care about people.  I'd say we probably have some on here.

http://ijr.com/2015/11/461306-these-5-acts-of-kindness-reveal-theres-more-to-donald-trump-than-just-his-celebrity-persona/

 

 

With Trump you are talking about a guy who changes wives like some change there underwear, the man is on record fucking people out of money, talking about women like they are objects, etc.

As far as Trump's call to the wife of the Green Beret I have to believe that he meant to say something kind and honorable and that it may have come out somewhat funky.....but with that why the fuck can't he just say I meant something nice but it came out wrong?

And what is up with being asked a question and then going off the rails and making false statements about your predecessors? The guy is the POTUS, he should act like it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Highmark said:

You can have an ego the size of NYC and still care about people.  I'd say we probably have some on here.

http://ijr.com/2015/11/461306-these-5-acts-of-kindness-reveal-theres-more-to-donald-trump-than-just-his-celebrity-persona/

 

 

Here is generosity by a guy who acts and behaves like he's been there before.

Quote

 

Gates Foundation Pledges $1.7 Billion to K-12 Education, Will Focus on Building School Networks

U.S. News & World Report

Marking a new chapter in education philanthropy, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation will step back from its traditional education reform agenda to instead invest close to $1.7 billion over the next five years on new initiatives that include a focus on building networks of schools.

"Education is, without a doubt, one of the most challenging areas we invest in as a foundation," Bill Gates is expected to say Thursday during a speech at the Council of the Great City Schools' annual conference in Cleveland, according to prepared remarks. "But I'm excited about the shift in our work and the focus on partnering with networks of schools."

In a sprawling address, the Microsoft co-founder and co-chair of one of the most influential and contentious entities involved in the education space plans to reflect on lessons learned about the foundation's efforts and how those lessons will play into its revamped vision for the future.

"There are some signs of progress," Gates is expected to say of past efforts. "But like many of you, we want to see faster and lasting change in student achievement."

During the Gates Foundation's involvement in education philanthropy over nearly two decades, the organization – of which Bill Gates' wife, Melinda Gates, is also a co-chair – has poured billions of dollars into advancing new ideas and played an especially significant role in the rise of the education reform movement. Yet it has been widely criticized for funneling funding into what some consider silver-bullet policies or the latest education fad.

One of the foundation's first serious forays into K-12 policy was its push for smaller schools– a contentious idea that yielded mixed results.

While it had a positive impact in some places – such as New York City, where graduation and college enrollment rates increased for the majority of smaller-scale schools – it didn't move the needle in many other places and ultimately was deemed too costly, both fiscally and politically, to replicate successfully.

The foundation's biggest bets, however, were in its decision to back the Common Core State Standards – academic benchmarks for what students should know by the end of each grade – and its push to reimagine teacher evaluation and compensation systems based in part on student test scores.

That effort dovetailed with the Obama administration's competitive education grant program, Race to the Top, which gave states hundreds of millions of dollars to carry out those very education policy changes, among others. The Gates Foundation was instrumental in helping states that won the funding but lacked the capacity and expertise to go it alone and carry out their winning proposals.

The results of those efforts, however, also were mixed.

The District of Columbia, for example, is hailed by many education policy experts as a model for how school districts can create evaluation systems that retain and reward the best teachers while showing the least effective ones the door. But some states, like Tennessee, have had a harder time sticking to their original visions, largely due to the politicization of Common Core, which led to a chain reaction in how states were able to test students and make the results of those tests part of teacher evaluations and pay scales.

In May 2016, Sue Desmond-Hellmann, CEO of the Gates Foundation, offered somewhat of a mea culpa for the foundation's misread of how ready – or not ready, as it turned out – states were to handle implementation of the Common Core standards.

"Unfortunately, our foundation underestimated the level of resources and support required for our public education systems to be well-equipped to implement the standards," Desmond-Hellmann wrote in an open letter. "We missed an early opportunity to sufficiently engage educators – particularly teachers – but also parents and communities so that the benefits of the standards could take flight from the beginning."

Gates is expected to use Thursday's speech in part to echo that sentiment, as he plans to say "it became clear that teacher evaluation is one important piece of several critical elements." Of the Common Core standards, he will say "more needs to be done to fully realize their potential."

He also will emphasize what the foundation will prioritize in the future. Going forward, Gates is expected to say, the foundation will no longer invest in new initiatives designed to tackle teacher evaluation and compensation, although it will continue to collect data on the effectiveness of its previous efforts. Instead, it plans to increase funding for curriculum design and professional development aligned to states' standards – be they the Common Core or others – and also continue its support for charter schools, though it will tailor that focus to schools that are improving outcomes for students with disabilities.

According to Gates, about 60 percent of the new $1.7 billion investment will support the development of new curricula and the foundation's new venture centered around building networks of existing schools, and about 15 percent will support the foundation's charter school work. The other 25 percent will focus on "big bets," which Gates characterizes as having "the potential to change the trajectory of public education over the next 10 to 15 years."

The foundation's vision for building school networks includes funding up to 30 networks, beginning with a focus on high-needs schools and districts in six to eight states where data collection and analysis is used to drive results, particularly when it comes to closing the achievement gap between students of color and low-income students and their white and wealthier peers.

"We will focus on locally driven solutions identified by networks of schools, and support their efforts to use data-driven continuous learning and evidence-based interventions to improve student achievement," Gates will say, underscoring a recent sea change in the foundation's recognition that local community buy-in is essential for the success of most education policies.

"We will leave it up to each network to decide what approaches they believe will work best to address their biggest challenges," Gates is expected to say. "Giving schools and districts more flexibility is more likely to lead to solutions that fit the needs of local communities and are potentially replicable elsewhere."

According to the prepared remarks, Gates additionally will outline what the foundation envisions for these networks by citing already-existing partnerships.

Examples he'll share include: the Network for College Success, a group of 15 schools that have partnered with the University of Chicago and in which researchers help educators keep tabs on a set of indicators predictive of student graduation and college enrollment;California's CORE Districts, which involves a group of school districts that banded together in 2010 to help each other implement the Common Core and more effective teacher training programs; and Tennessee's Lift Education, which brings together superintendents from rural and urban districts across the state to collaborate on best practices.

"We believe this kind of approach – where groups of schools have the flexibility to propose the set of approaches they want – will lead to more impactful and durable systemic change that is attractive enough to be widely adopted by other schools," Gates will say.

Over the next 30 to 60 days, the foundation plans to gauge interest from nonprofits and other education organizations about leading school networks, and to gather information about their experience and capacity to do so. Working with chosen intermediaries, the foundation eventually will begin looking at specific schools to participate in its networking effort.

"If there is one thing I have learned," Gates will say, "it is that no matter how enthusiastic we might be about one approach or another, the decision to go from pilot to wide-scale usage is ultimately and always something that has to be decided by you and others in the field."

Copyright 2017 U.S. News & World Report

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/gates-foundation-pledges-dollar17-billion-to-k-12-education-will-focus-on-building-school-networks/ar-AAtJnj6

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
3 hours ago, Mileage Psycho said:

Here is generosity by a guy who acts and behaves like he's been there before.

 

Does that include his population control vaccine.  :lmao:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...