Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted August 3, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 3, 2017 28 minutes ago, FAT DAVE said: To dumb it down for you....cause a GOP is president 3 minutes ago, SnowRider said: Can someone explain the following: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 3, 2017 Share Posted August 3, 2017 Can you imagine how much the market would have sunk if Hillary won..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted August 3, 2017 Share Posted August 3, 2017 28 minutes ago, FAT DAVE said: To dumb it down for you....cause a GOP is president um, a gop'er wasn't president for the last 8 years when the marker made huge climbs, which continued into trump's term. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted August 3, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 3, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: um, a gop'er wasn't president for the last 8 years when the marker made huge climbs, which continued into trump's term. Dumb Dave = Doe Dumber 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted August 3, 2017 Share Posted August 3, 2017 Just now, FAT DAVE said: Can you imagine how much the market would have sunk if Hillary won..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 3, 2017 Share Posted August 3, 2017 Just now, SnowRider said: Dumb Dave = Doe Dumber 👍 Snowrider= sore loser Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted August 3, 2017 Share Posted August 3, 2017 so if Hillary was a continuation of the Obama years, and the stock market made some massive climbs over the Obama years and was still climbing when Hillary would have taken over.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted August 3, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 3, 2017 1 minute ago, FAT DAVE said: Snowrider= sore loser So you don't have a real answer or info to support your lying rhetoric -- so you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 3, 2017 Share Posted August 3, 2017 1 minute ago, SnowRider said: So you don't have a real answer or info to support your lying rhetoric -- so you Do you ever give any answers other then crybaby repetitive garbage? Trump has reversed numerous Obama decisions..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted August 3, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 3, 2017 1 minute ago, ICEMAN! said: http://www.factcheck.org/2008/02/the-budget-and-deficit-under-clinton/ I can post up article after article as well Ice. I provide a link directly to the US Treasury deficit tracker. Put in the dates yourself there was NO SURPLUS. Clinton camp simply used a play on numbers. https://mises.org/library/surplus-hoax The Budget document unfortunately does not reveal that the System financed massive U.S. government expenditures by purchasing $507 billion of U.S. Treasury securities with money it printed; the Treasury then paid an interest of more than $30 billion to the Fed, which then returned the funds to the Treasury as "Miscellaneous Receipts." In short, one government agency, the Fed, now prints money at minimal costs; another agency, the U.S. Treasury, spends it, but pays an interest to the Fed, which then returns the funds to the Treasury. (Federal Reserve Bulletin, October 2000, p. A5, A26) If a corporation were to engage in such practices, its officers would soon be languishing in federal penitentiaries. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted August 3, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 3, 2017 3 minutes ago, FAT DAVE said: Do you ever give any answers other then crybaby repetitive garbage? Trump has reversed numerous Obama decisions..... I just posted a string of answers.....and your stupid ass Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted August 3, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 3, 2017 12 minutes ago, SnowRider said: Derp Derp = Derpity Derp 👍 That's how I read this repetitive shit of yours 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted August 3, 2017 Share Posted August 3, 2017 5 minutes ago, Highmark said: I can post up article after article as well Ice. I provide a link directly to the US Treasury deficit tracker. Put in the dates yourself there was NO SURPLUS. Clinton camp simply used a play on numbers. https://mises.org/library/surplus-hoax The Budget document unfortunately does not reveal that the System financed massive U.S. government expenditures by purchasing $507 billion of U.S. Treasury securities with money it printed; the Treasury then paid an interest of more than $30 billion to the Fed, which then returned the funds to the Treasury as "Miscellaneous Receipts." In short, one government agency, the Fed, now prints money at minimal costs; another agency, the U.S. Treasury, spends it, but pays an interest to the Fed, which then returns the funds to the Treasury. (Federal Reserve Bulletin, October 2000, p. A5, A26) If a corporation were to engage in such practices, its officers would soon be languishing in federal penitentiaries. Nice try Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 3, 2017 Share Posted August 3, 2017 1 minute ago, SnowRider said: I just posted a string of answers.....and your stupid ass The only thing youve owned is yourself. You lost...your whole world has obviously become unhinged from it....you should take a step back and see what others see....you would shake your head. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted August 3, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 3, 2017 1 minute ago, FAT DAVE said: The only thing youve owned is yourself. You lost...your whole world has obviously become unhinged from it....you should take a step back and see what others see....you would shake your head. I'm good and calm and you're delusional And Dumb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted August 3, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 3, 2017 1 minute ago, SnowRider said: I'm good and calm and you're delusional And Dumb Delusional is you picking the loosing horse over and over. The high point of your entire life was when Obama was in office. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted August 3, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 3, 2017 21 minutes ago, SnowRider said: Can someone explain the following: Sure. Clinton had the benefit of the .Com era and a GOP held congress. Congress has more to do with the economy than the POTUS. W.Bush had the .com bubble burst, 9/11 and the housing bubble all to deal with. While he needs to take part the blame as he was POTUS there is plenty to go around in all three cases. Obama started at a low point of a major recession then had Trillions of QE money pumped into the markets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 3, 2017 Share Posted August 3, 2017 3 minutes ago, SnowRider said: I'm good and calm and you're delusional And Dumb You dont behave like you are calm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 3, 2017 Share Posted August 3, 2017 1 minute ago, Highmark said: Sure. Clinton had the benefit of the .Com era and a GOP held congress. Congress has more to do with the economy than the POTUS. W.Bush had the .com bubble burst, 9/11 and the housing bubble all to deal with. While he needs to take part the blame as he was POTUS there is plenty to go around in all three cases. Obama started at a low point of a major recession then had Trillions of QE money pumped into the markets. An informed person would not post the graphs snowrider does... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bussman Posted August 3, 2017 Share Posted August 3, 2017 23 minutes ago, FAT DAVE said: Snowrider= sore loser Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted August 3, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 3, 2017 2 minutes ago, Highmark said: Sure. Clinton had the benefit of the .Com era and a GOP held congress. Congress has more to do with the economy than the POTUS. W.Bush had the .com bubble burst, 9/11 and the housing bubble all to deal with. While he needs to take part the blame as he was POTUS there is plenty to go around in all three cases. Obama started at a low point of a major recession then had Trillions of QE money pumped into the markets. Excuses Once again..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted August 3, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 3, 2017 1 minute ago, FAT DAVE said: An informed person would not post the graphs snowrider does... No - an informed person would not make a statement that the market is up simply because Dump is an R.....younhave not posted any info to support your drivel while I've posted info to refute it..that's called getting your flabby ass Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 3, 2017 Share Posted August 3, 2017 1 minute ago, SnowRider said: No - an informed person would not make a statement that the market is up simply because Dump is an R.....younhave not posted any info to support your drivel while I've posted info to refute it..that's called getting your flabby ass You refute everything Trump does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 3, 2017 Share Posted August 3, 2017 I seem to recall all the other repetitive charts you posted how Hillary was going to win the election...and Trump didn't have a chance....how did those work out for ya? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted August 3, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 3, 2017 (edited) 13 minutes ago, SnowRider said: Excuses Once again..... You have to look at everything. Not just on the surface. Edited August 3, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.