franks pond Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 Canada shouldn’t donate to the Clinton Foundation 20 million to a crime family,,,,nice work POSTMEDIA NETWORK FIRST POSTED: WEDNESDAY, JULY 12, 2017 06:54 PM EDT | UPDATED: WEDNESDAY, JULY 12, 2017 07:05 PM EDT Hillary Rodham Clinton shares the stage with her daughter Chelsea Clinton while speaking at the Clinton Foundation's No Ceilings: The Full Participation Project at the Lower Eastside Girls Club on April 17, 2014 in New York City. Share131 Change text size for the story Print this story Report an error Justin Trudeau has been a vocal advocate on women’s issues. Our Prime Minister has been praised, both here and abroad, for his efforts to advance equality among men and women. He’s been particularly effective advocating for the United Nations and other governments to do more to help women living in violent or oppressive conditions, particularly women in those parts of the world subjected to barbaric practices such as female genital mutilation or child and forced marriages. We could not be more supportive of this sort of advocacy. Canada can and should play a leadership role in advancing initiatives that foster real change in the lives of women globally. However, we have real concerns with plans announced Tuesday by the Liberal government to hand $20 million over to the Clinton Foundation to “support projects that will provide critical sexual and reproduction health (SRH) services” around the world. View image on Twitter Follow Development Canada ✔@CanadaDev is championing #SRHR for women & girls globally with $241.5M announcement @FP2020Global#HerFuture http://ow.ly/7rUK30dwAE0 7:20 AM - 11 Jul 2017 141141 Retweets 171171 likes Twitter Ads info and privacy The initiative was created under the umbrella of the Clinton Foundation, formed by former U.S. President Bill Clinton, and prominently supported by both Hillary and daughter Chelsea Clinton. The Clinton’s have earned millions from their association with the foundation, not from direct compensation, but through book and speaking tour fees. Bill Clinton, for example, reportedly received $26 million in speaking fees from organizations that donated to the foundation. Meanwhile, the lavish foundation-related travel needs of the Clintons – including first-class tickets and charter planes – are covered by its donors. More problematically, the foundation was at the heart of the cash-for-access scandal that dogged Hillary during her failed bid for the U.S. presidency. While Hillary was Secretary of State, the Clinton foundation received millions from rich and powerful donors, including foreign governments – many of whom were seeking favorable decisions from the U.S. State Department. Without doubt there were inflammatory allegations during the campaign about improper ethical behaviour, but just as clearly there were legitimate questions about relationships between the donors, the Clintons and their foundation. And there’s no doubt the foundation has served as a powerful political tool for the Clintons. Into this sticky wicket wades Justin Trudeau. We take no issue with our government showing leadership on women’s issues. We do question the wisdom of using Canadian taxpayer cash to get into bed with the Clintons. Correction: A previous version of this story incorrectly noted the sum handed over to the Clinton Health Access Initiative. The total is $20 million, which is a portion of a broader $241.5 million announcement of numerous contributions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted July 13, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 13, 2017 1 hour ago, ICEMAN! said: Should I repost my list from yesterday of all the alt right conspiracy fantasies that haven't gone anywhere? Maybe you should just worry about your fuckhead PM paying off terrorists. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 3 minutes ago, Biggie Smails said: Maybe you should just worry about your fuckhead PM paying off terrorists. Better to settle and spend 10 than lose and spend 20. Nevermind the $5 million already spent by the previous government denying him of his rights and losing multiple Supreme Court cases. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 2 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: Better to settle and spend 10 than lose and spend 20. Nevermind the $5 million already spent by the previous government denying him of his rights and losing multiple Supreme Court cases. Rights? He lost his rights a long time ago.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 1 minute ago, FAT DAVE said: Rights? He lost his rights a long time ago.... He got 40 years and Barry let him out he should still be in GITMO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 2 minutes ago, FAT DAVE said: Rights? He lost his rights a long time ago.... Well our Supreme Court disagrees with you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 4 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: Well our Supreme Court disagrees with you And you're ok with the supreme courts ruling... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 4 minutes ago, FAT DAVE said: And you're ok with the supreme courts ruling... They are the highest law in the country. It is what it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 30 minutes ago, Biggie Smails said: Maybe you should just worry about your fuckhead PM paying off terrorists. which one? 25 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: Better to settle and spend 10 than lose and spend 20. Nevermind the $5 million already spent by the previous government denying him of his rights and losing multiple Supreme Court cases. Strange how Harper's pay out in 2014 of 10.5 million isn't spoken about, nor the millions paid out to about 8 other Canadian's all for the exact same reason. I find it all disturbing 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 11 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: They are the highest law in the country. It is what it is. So you support terrorism.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 24 minutes ago, Momorider said: He got 40 years and Barry let him out he should still be in GITMO Didn't you scream like a little girl that Barry never closed GITMO? now you want it open for ever.... And he was released under Harper dummy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 7 minutes ago, FAT DAVE said: So you support terrorism.... I support the rule of law Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 1 hour ago, ICEMAN! said: Exhibit "A" Oh, I'll proudly accept that nomination. 1 minute ago, ICEMAN! said: I support the rule of law As long as it sides with your muslim hoards and puts the "evil" western society at risk. Fact is, our courts have turned dangerously left and have decided to used their power as an advocacy group. Their interpretations of the law are as skewed as possible. When normal citizens can read the law then look at the decisions and say...'WTF?", clearly, they are off kilter. Look at Trumps travel ban debacle. Even the lower courts knew their "stay" shit wasn't gonna last once it hit the big courts...but they kept doubling down...and down...and down. Idiots. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 20 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: I support the rule of law Since when is going to another country and joining terrorists killing people from your own country ok? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 Just now, FAT DAVE said: Since when is going to another country and joining terrorists killing people from your own country ok? He was 15 and forced by his dad. When an adult kidnaps a child and forces them into prostution or child pornography, is the child charged or the adult? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 1 minute ago, ICEMAN! said: He was 15 and forced by his dad. When an adult kidnaps a child and forces them into prostution or child pornography, is the child charged or the adult? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 If you join a war you are fare game. If you fight against the country you apparently are living in you deserve to die. Why because you are killing your own countryman. These people are fakes and only use the system for health care and free hand outs. Then they leave until they need it again. Read up on that and you will see. The family came here mid 80's before the mother insisted the western way was poisonous to her children then took them back to Pakistan to be raised only to return at any given time to use our flawed our system for health care. Nothing else... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rw06GT Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 22 minutes ago, Zambroski said: Oh, I'll proudly accept that nomination. As long as it sides with your muslim hoards and puts the "evil" western society at risk. Fact is, our courts have turned dangerously left and have decided to used their power as an advocacy group. Their interpretations of the law are as skewed as possible. When normal citizens can read the law then look at the decisions and say...'WTF?", clearly, they are off kilter. Look at Trumps travel ban debacle. Even the lower courts knew their "stay" shit wasn't gonna last once it hit the big courts...but they kept doubling down...and down...and down. Idiots. Poor ice. Dumber than a nigger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 Just now, FAT DAVE said: If you join a war you are fare game. If you fight against the country you apparently are living in you deserve to die. Why because you are killing your own countryman. These people are fakes and only use the system for health care and free hand outs. Then they leave until they need it again. Read up on that and you will see. The family came here mid 80's before the mother insisted the western way was poisonous to her children then took them back to Pakistan to be raised only to return at any given time to use our flawed our system for health care. Nothing else... Laws are laws. Sorry about your "feels" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 2 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: Laws are laws. Sorry about your "feels" if Harper gave him the money it would be a whole different story for you.... Its sad you would rather give a terrorist a pay off then fight him and give him nothing....it says alot about you as a person. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 2 minutes ago, Rw06GT said: Poor ice. Dumber than a nigger. Hey sweet. Is that you? I know an old guy that has literally hundreds on models. The detail on some is absolutely amazing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 Just now, FAT DAVE said: if Harper gave him the money it waould be a whole different story for you.... Its sad you would rather give a terrorist s pay off then fight him and give him nothing....it says alot about you as a person. Harper did pay out a number of these kind of cases. Duhhhh. That's where the precedent was set. It says a lot about you that you'd rather fight this to the end and pay out $20 million+ instead of just settling what is a foregone legal conclusion. There's lots of blame to go around here. This debacle all started under a Liberal government. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 Just now, ICEMAN! said: Harper did pay out a number of these kind of cases. Duhhhh. That's where the precedent was set. It says a lot about you that you'd rather fight this to the end and pay out $20 million+ instead of just settling what is a foregone legal conclusion. There's lots of blame to go around here. This debacle all started under a Liberal government. No need to state the obvious.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 As for your Harper comment....which case are you comparing it to? Mahar Arar? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 2 minutes ago, FAT DAVE said: As for your Harper comment....which case are you comparing it to? Mahar Arar? The payout was for the exact same reason - right or wrong it was done Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.