Snake Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: the facts speak for themselves... "How the liberals were right from day one..." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: the facts speak for themselves... What info did the russian have? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 10, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: the facts speak for themselves... Dude I've proved you wrong with multiple definitions of collusion. Taking a meeting with someone who claims to have damaging information on Hillary is not of in itself collusion. There would have to be actions that occurred from that information for collusion or conspiracy. Damn man open your mind for once. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: i have good memory dude. i don't need files, or spreadsheets to remember what people at one time said. would you like some examples with you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Highmark said: Dude I've proved you wrong with multiple definitions of collusion. Taking a meeting with someone who claims to have damaging information on Hillary is not of in itself collusion. There would have to be actions that occurred from that information for collusion or conspiracy. Damn man open your mind for once. i can't wait to read your excuses when more and more is revealed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Highmark said: Dude I've proved you wrong with multiple definitions of collusion. Taking a meeting with someone who claims to have damaging information on Hillary is not of in itself collusion. There would have to be actions that occurred from that information for collusion or conspiracy. Damn man open your mind for once. Words like opposition research only work when it is a piss file.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: i can't wait to read your excuses when more and more is revealed. I can't wait to read your excuses when Mueller finds no collusion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 note to self - never make a bet with highmark again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 10, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: i can't wait to read your excuses when more and more is revealed. So now you admit taking this meeting is not collusion in of itself? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: note to self - never make a bet with highmark again. The fact that you think you've already won the bet is enough for anyone to refrain from ever making a bet with you again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 10, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: note to self - never make a bet with highmark again. Keep making a fool of yourself. We are enjoying it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Highmark said: Keep making a fool of yourself. We are enjoying it. Immensely. I'm taking him to Vegas. He can convince them I shouldn't have to wait for my "black jack" before they pay up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 3 minutes ago, Highmark said: So now you admit taking this meeting is not collusion in of itself? no, i did not admit that. what i was implying is that if you can't even admit the loss of this bet with an "admission" by one of the people included in the bet, i know damn well you're going to try squirming out on anything else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 10, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 10, 2017 Not even liberal MSM definitively calling the meeting collusion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 (edited) 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: no, i did not admit that. what i was implying is that if you can't even admit the loss of this bet with an "admission" by one of the people included in the bet, i know damn well you're going to try squirming out on anything else. You're asking us to call the election just as the polls open. How would that work out for you? Edited July 10, 2017 by Snake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 10, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: no, i did not admit that. what i was implying is that if you can't even admit the loss of this bet with an "admission" by one of the people included in the bet, i know damn well you're going to try squirming out on anything else. What? Trump Jr, Manifort or Kushner would all be on Trumps team and if they collude with Russia I will pay the bet. Hell I'll even throw in this lawyer even though it was pretty clear to anyone with any intelligence this is about Russia Govt and Trump team collusion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 3 minutes ago, Highmark said: What? Trump Jr, Manifort or Kushner would all be on Trumps team and if they collude with Russia I will pay the bet. Hell I'll even throw in this lawyer even though it was pretty clear to anyone with any intelligence this is about Russia Govt and Trump team collusion. why do you keep bringing "gov" into it? that was not part of the bet. i specifically left that out because the Russian hackers could have not been technically in the Russian gov. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 The left has lost their minds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oleroule Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 10, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 10, 2017 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: why do you keep bringing "gov" into it? that was not part of the bet. i specifically left that out because the Russian hackers could have not been technically in the Russian gov. So average, run of the mill Russian citizens with NO TIES to the Rusian govt were colluding against Hillary? I mean if you want to (which I think you did) claim this lawyer had ties to the Kremlin its one thing but why would your average Russian citizen collude against Hillary? Edited July 10, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 5 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said: The left has lost their minds They're exceedingly proficient at losing things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Highmark said: So average, run of the mill Russian citizens with NO TIES to the Rusian govt were colluding against Hillary? maybe, but that isn't relevant to the bet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 10, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: maybe, but that isn't relevant to the bet. Ok we will include this female attorney. There still is no evidence of collusion based on the Trump team taking the meeting. Do you finally at least get that something has to come out of the meeting (actions) to even start talking collusion? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Holy fucking shit Slinger is a fucking brain dead cum sponge moron.....sweet fuck this country is doomed. Just no ability to think critically at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.