AKIQPilot Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: I already did. And you struck out. Thanks for trying though. Better luck next time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: I already did. 100% about everything any anything for years Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: http://www.npr.org/2017/07/09/536345533/trump-son-admits-to-meeting-russian-lawyer-with-offer-of-helpful-info-for-campai I meet with Russians all the time too. What helpful info did he get from "the Russians"? What helpful info did "this Russian" actually have. A bunch of nothing is all you have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 fucking tom you wanted to "hang" with the resident idiots on this trump/Russia thing, now you're going to sink to the bottom with them. what kind of fucking idiot can't see that there was definitely some Russian collusion in all of this? especially when that same idiot could bite into some many other bullshit stories with much, much, much less smoke and evidence Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 10, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: http://www.npr.org/2017/07/09/536345533/trump-son-admits-to-meeting-russian-lawyer-with-offer-of-helpful-info-for-campai When a law enforcement official meets with a drug dealer yet no drugs are exchanged has a crime been committed? Elements of Conspiracy Charges Many people assume that a conspiracy charge requires a large number of people or a substantial amount of criminal activity. In actuality, a conspiracy charge actually requires a great deal less. Generally, to support conspiracy charges, the prosecution must prove that (1) a person entered an agreement, (2) with at least one other person, and (3) that at least one person to the agreement performed an act to further the agreement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, AKIQPilot said: I meet with Russians all the time too. What helpful info did he get from "the Russians"? What helpful info did "this Russian" actually have. A bunch of nothing is all you have. yep, I've met a few myself as well. nothing to do with possible damage on a presidential candidate running against my dad though. you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: fucking tom you wanted to "hang" with the resident idiots on this trump/Russia thing, now you're going to sink to the bottom with them. what kind of fucking idiot can't see that there was definitely some Russian collusion in all of this? especially when that same idiot could bite into some many other bullshit stories with much, much, much less smoke and evidence Lets see what Mueller comes up with. When he comes up with collusion then you will be vindicated. When he comes up with money laundering or some other illegal activity you will not be vindicated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: fucking tom you wanted to "hang" with the resident idiots on this trump/Russia thing, now you're going to sink to the bottom with them. what kind of fucking idiot can't see that there was definitely some Russian collusion in all of this? especially when that same idiot could bite into some many other bullshit stories with much, much, much less smoke and evidence Oh goodie! I was waiting for the 'trying to look good for your buddies' narrative! He's progressing along exactly according to schedule! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, AKIQPilot said: Lets see what Mueller comes up with. When he comes up with collusion then you will be vindicated. When he comes up with money laundering or some other illegal activity you will not be vindicated. i shouldn't need to wait for that to redeem my $100. the bet had nothing to with convictions, the investigation, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: i shouldn't need to wait for that to redeem my $100. the bet had nothing to with convictions, the investigation, etc. Hahaha. IMO you should. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 are you leaning towards money-laundering now tom? why are you mentioning that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: i shouldn't need to wait for that to redeem my $100. the bet had nothing to with convictions, the investigation, etc. Just your interpretation of the bet. "I CALL THIS COLLUSION!!!!!!" That's a meeting. "COLLUSION! COLLUSION COLLUSION COLLUSION!!!!!!!!!1111111111111111" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, AKIQPilot said: Hahaha. IMO you should. a bet is a bet. likely the last one i make in here as i knew this would happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: i shouldn't need to wait for that to redeem my $100. the bet had nothing to with convictions, the investigation, etc. It had to do with evidence of collusion if I'm not mistaken. And I rarely am.....right? Right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Seems the White House is in a tizzy over this news. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: are you leaning towards money-laundering now tom? why are you mentioning that? Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: are you leaning towards money-laundering now tom? why are you mentioning that? I mentioned it weeks ago. I don't believe there was collusion but to think Mueller won't find other improper activities surrounding the trumps would be naive. I've said that all along. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Mainecat said: Seems the White House is in a tizzy over this news. Please provide the link from VOX or Buzzfeed.....or CNN. quack, quack. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, AKIQPilot said: I mentioned it weeks ago. I don't believe there was collusion but to think Mueller won't find other improper activities surrounding the trumps would be naive. I've said that all along. i mentioned it months ago, and I'm pretty sure you laughed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: i mentioned it months ago, and I'm pretty sure you laughed. I specifically mentioned it months ago too. I'm not claiming there is money laundering or any other improprieties but it wouldn't surprise me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 10, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 10, 2017 4 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: i shouldn't need to wait for that to redeem my $100. the bet had nothing to with convictions, the investigation, etc. So you are the sole decider of the bet? Come on man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: i mentioned it months ago, and I'm pretty sure you laughed. Slinger consults his research on all FSCE members.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Highmark said: So you are the sole decider of the bet? Come on man. Comical for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Highmark said: So you are the sole decider of the bet? Come on man. the facts speak for themselves... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Snake said: Slinger consults his research on all FSCE members.... i have good memory dude. i don't need files, or spreadsheets to remember what people at one time said. would you like some examples with you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.