https://grist.org/culture/the-midwest-defined-itself-by-its-winters-what-happens-when-they-disappear/
 

Say goodbye to your winters in the Midwest.  
 

Queue the climate change deniers is 3, 2, 1…. 

2 hours ago, AK440 said:

Why so many words Krom? Why don’t you just quote where I supposedly I wrote it was fake like you keep claiming, over and over and over ad nauseum? 
 

 

If you're trying to look stupid, congratulations.

2 hours ago, AK440 said:

Why so many words Krom? Why don’t you just quote where I supposedly I wrote it was fake like you keep claiming, over and over and over ad nauseum? 
 

 

Ad nauseam like your lying, or like begging for a link you are too stupid to find on your own?

I'm truly sorry you're washer fluid pickled little brain can't comprehend what I'm saying. 

It would be more satisfying if you could realize how bad you've been

4 hours ago, Deephaven said:

You've never backed anything up.  Fictional story telling articles are not fact.

2 hours ago, krom said:

Ad nauseam like your lying, or like begging for a link you are too stupid to find on your own?

I'm truly sorry you're washer fluid pickled little brain can't comprehend what I'm saying. 

It would be more satisfying if you could realize how bad you've been

I remember the link you posted, this one: https://prism.oregonstate.edu

Why does all the climate data on that site show temperatures trending higher Krom? 
 

2 hours ago, awful knawful said:

If you're trying to look stupid, congratulations.

Someone is lashing out because they don’t know what ad nauseam means. 

2014  95.8  93.1  96.1  96.1  60.8  92.3
2015  95.7  72.9  96.4  98.1  82.4  88.8
2016  22.7  26.8  48.0  78.7  23.5  33.8
2017  18.7  18.2  35.4  35.5   5.8  19.4
2018  77.2  51.3  81.4  95.1  24.7  69.0
2019  94.9  55.8  95.7  94.3  39.8  80.9
2020  22.6  17.2  32.1  15.9  10.7  19.5
2021  50.6  33.3  48.3  85.7  20.6  45.8
2022  79.5  37.5  67.2  93.8  29.4  56.1
2023  19.8  21.5  34.4  40.2  16.4  21.6
2024  12.0  18.3  22.6  35.7   5.3  16.0

first row is superior

6 years over 50% same as previous 10.this decade actually has more over 90% coverage than previous 10!

70's and early 80's were damn cold and ice coverage was high but cant base entire history of ice coverage by 70's coverage but thats what they do.

Edited July 12, 2024Jul 12 by X2700

12 hours ago, AK440 said:

I remember the link you posted, this one: https://prism.oregonstate.edu

I never posted that link.

Because you are incapable of finding a website on your own I posted a link showing you how to use Google. 

It's been around 5 weeks and you still haven't posted any data showing that the image of temps in 1988 was anything but correct. 

5 hours ago, krom said:

I never posted that link. It’s the website you kept referring to dumbass.

Because you are incapable of finding a website on your own I posted a link showing you how to use Google. 

It's been around 5 weeks and you still haven't posted any data showing that the image of temps in 1988 was anything but correct. 

9 hours ago, X2700 said:

2014  95.8  93.1  96.1  96.1  60.8  92.3
2015  95.7  72.9  96.4  98.1  82.4  88.8
2016  22.7  26.8  48.0  78.7  23.5  33.8
2017  18.7  18.2  35.4  35.5   5.8  19.4
2018  77.2  51.3  81.4  95.1  24.7  69.0
2019  94.9  55.8  95.7  94.3  39.8  80.9
2020  22.6  17.2  32.1  15.9  10.7  19.5
2021  50.6  33.3  48.3  85.7  20.6  45.8
2022  79.5  37.5  67.2  93.8  29.4  56.1
2023  19.8  21.5  34.4  40.2  16.4  21.6
2024  12.0  18.3  22.6  35.7   5.3  16.0

first row is superior

6 years over 50% same as previous 10.this decade actually has more over 90% coverage than previous 10!

70's and early 80's were damn cold and ice coverage was high but cant base entire history of ice coverage by 70's coverage but thats what they do.

 Cherry pick data much?  Go back as far as official records have been kept and get back to me. Oh, include a link. I don’t give two shits about you typing things in a message. 

Let’s see if @krom is too stupid to understand this? 
 

https://climatekids.nasa.gov/climate-change-meaning/

18 minutes ago, AK440 said:

Let’s see if @krom is too stupid to understand this? 
 

I see you found a website to cater to someone with your mental capacity.

If you weren't such a moron, you'd find it interesting that they are claiming the warmest years happened in the last 20, but most every record is over a hundred years old...

You would also find it interesting that they are attempting to compensate for urban sprawl by modifying the data, and that starting in 99 or so they made a lot of changes to the recording, and modified historical data.  Interestingly enough the changes to the data made the appearance of warming more drastic.

But you're way too much of a moron to deal with any of that

Still haven't figured out that website have you

Going on 5 weeks and you haven't been able to figure out anything about that facebook pic.

3 hours ago, AK440 said:

BJ's & hand jobs?

Are you advertising?

Maybe first 90 in twin cities this weekend.

cool summer so far!!

 

1 hour ago, X2700 said:

Maybe first 90 in twin cities this weekend.

cool summer so far!!

 

Congratulations understanding how weather works.

5 hours ago, krom said:

I see you found a website to cater to someone with your mental capacity.

If you weren't such a moron, you'd find it interesting that they are claiming the warmest years happened in the last 20, but most every record is over a hundred years old...

You would also find it interesting that they are attempting to compensate for urban sprawl by modifying the data, and that starting in 99 or so they made a lot of changes to the recording, and modified historical data.  Interestingly enough the changes to the data made the appearance of warming more drastic.

But you're way too much of a moron to deal with any of that

Still haven't figured out that website have you

Going on 5 weeks and you haven't been able to figure out anything about that facebook pic.

So you don’t understand how climate change works. Got it. 
https://climatekids.nasa.gov/climate-change-meaning/

11 hours ago, AK440 said:

So you don’t understand how climate change works. Got it

So you don't understand climate, human nature, or much of anything at all.  Got it..
Pretty sweet graph showing a massive 2 degree F change since 1880.   Now tell us what the margin of error was for temperatures taken in the 1800's, 1900's, and even 2000's

Shocked that you have enough of a brain to be washed..

Still waiting for you to disprove those images you so desperately needed the link to disprove

Edited July 13, 2024Jul 13 by krom

When La Nina kicks in and we have another banner year for snow/riding sleds, Alaskan Karen will double down on his climate change stupidity.  Just watch

6 hours ago, krom said:

So you don't understand climate, human nature, or much of anything at all.  Got it..
Pretty sweet graph showing a massive 2 degree F change since 1880.   Now tell us what the margin of error was for temperatures taken in the 1800's, 1900's, and even 2000's

Shocked that you have enough of a brain to be washed..

Still waiting for you to disprove those images you so desperately needed the link to disprove

I’ve proved climate change is happening beyond a shadow of a doubt. You’ve provided nothing except extremely wordy, Unibomber like manifestos.

5 hours ago, Bontz said:

When La Nina kicks in and we have another banner year for snow/riding sleds, Alaskan Karen will double down on his climate change stupidity.  Just watch

It’s going to be fucking hilarious when you are eating your words this winter. 

6 hours ago, krom said:

So you don't understand climate, human nature, or much of anything at all.  Got it..
Pretty sweet graph showing a massive 2 degree F change since 1880.   Now tell us what the margin of error was for temperatures taken in the 1800's, 1900's, and even 2000's

 

https://www.wwf.org.uk/updates/here-are-10-myths-about-climate-change

More evidence that you’re wrong dipshit. Same boat as @Bontz @Deephaven @mnstang

All your ignorant climate change denier arguments are addressed right there.         
 

20 hours ago, AK440 said:

Congratulations understanding how weather works.

I understand perfectly but not sure you do?

3 hours ago, AK440 said:

I’ve proved climate change is happening beyond a shadow of a doubt. You’ve provided nothing except extremely wordy, Unibomber like manifestos.

It’s going to be fucking hilarious when you are eating your words this winter. 

It's going to be fucking hilarious when you are clutching your pearls as we rack up the miles this winter.  Be ready, dumb ass ... your gloating after one extreme year, is all you will have to be happy about in your pathetic, Eskimo, life.

And the sad reality is that he still won't be able to afford a sled.

On 7/12/2024 at 7:04 AM, X2700 said:

2014  95.8  93.1  96.1  96.1  60.8  92.3
2015  95.7  72.9  96.4  98.1  82.4  88.8
2016  22.7  26.8  48.0  78.7  23.5  33.8
2017  18.7  18.2  35.4  35.5   5.8  19.4
2018  77.2  51.3  81.4  95.1  24.7  69.0
2019  94.9  55.8  95.7  94.3  39.8  80.9
2020  22.6  17.2  32.1  15.9  10.7  19.5
2021  50.6  33.3  48.3  85.7  20.6  45.8
2022  79.5  37.5  67.2  93.8  29.4  56.1
2023  19.8  21.5  34.4  40.2  16.4  21.6
2024  12.0  18.3  22.6  35.7   5.3  16.0

first row is superior

6 years over 50% same as previous 10.this decade actually has more over 90% coverage than previous 10!

70's and early 80's were damn cold and ice coverage was high but cant base entire history of ice coverage by 70's coverage but thats what they do.

I have 20 years of shore line ownership on superior. It’s back to normal level. It was high the last 5 years caused by global warming. It went way down for about 5 or 6 years around the 2010s. caused by global warming.  The water cycles are obviously global warming 

14 hours ago, Not greg b said:

I have 20 years of shore line ownership on superior. It’s back to normal level. It was high the last 5 years caused by global warming. It went way down for about 5 or 6 years around the 2010s. caused by global warming.  The water cycles are obviously global warming 

Wow! A whole 20 years of climate history. Dang, you should get a Nobel Prize.

Gee, wow, Lake Superior water temps have increased over 3°C over the past 100 years. Ice cover has decreased. @Not greg b is an idiot. 
 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262138032_A_Century_of_Temperature_Variability_in_Lake_Superior