ActionfigureJoe Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 (edited) There’s a good chance Trump has the dough to cover the fines. But should he pay? The optics of having tish taking away his homes and businesses would make for an outstanding campaign ad. He would be the victim of the century. If the government can due this to him, imagine what they can and often do to the little guy. I say he sit back and let them grab trump tower and his other businesses. Network can cover it and interview those on his payroll that will now be out of work. Tish will have guaranteed his reelection. Edited March 24 by ActionfigureJoe 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crnr2Crnr Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 I don't agree with numerous layers of the case, but it is a bit amusing to amusing to see DJT get grabbed by his pussy. and the memes, OH the memes!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 He puts up the bond and the case spends the next 4 plus years in appeals court that would lead to the supreme Court unless one of the New York courts puts and end to it. But the dream of taking Trump's property is not going to happen. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snoughnut Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 14 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said: He puts up the bond and the case spends the next 4 plus years in appeals court that would lead to the supreme Court unless one of the New York courts puts and end to it. But the dream of taking Trump's property is not going to happen. The fact that the cunt LeTWATcia James and judge Engoron the moron even had the power to bring it this far is disturbing.There was no crime and no victim. Just goes to show how far the modern day evil trash Democrats will go just for a political hit job. Intelligent Americans will make these greasy Democrats pay in the coming election. 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 Who cares he pays either way. And he will open his trap and lose more votes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 34 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Who cares he pays either way. And he will open his trap and lose more votes. You are so focused on Trump you can not see the implications of what this DA and Judge have done. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member ViperGTS/Z1 Posted March 24 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 24 He should be reimbursed for taxes he paid on the "inflated" prices. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 2 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said: You are so focused on Trump you can not see the implications of what this DA and Judge have done. Yeah no one is above the law. Covering for him is sick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 2 minutes ago, ViperGTS/Z1 said: He should be reimbursed for taxes he paid on the "inflated" prices. Your so fuckin uninformed about the case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 (edited) 5 minutes ago, ViperGTS/Z1 said: He should be reimbursed for taxes he paid on the "inflated" prices. He under inflated when it came to tax purposes. It’s part of the case against him. strange your memes didn’t tell you about that. Edited March 24 by akvanden Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 13 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Yeah no one is above the law. Covering for him is sick. The law they are using has never been used in this manor and there is no presidence for it. Again you are just to invested in TDS to see this clearly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member ViperGTS/Z1 Posted March 24 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 24 56 minutes ago, akvanden said: He under inflated when it came to tax purposes. It’s part of the case against him. strange your memes didn’t tell you about that. I bet he didn't declare Mar-A-Lago at 18 million Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 3 minutes ago, ViperGTS/Z1 said: I bet he didn't declare Mar-A-Lago at 18 million Close, he tried to fight $26M valuation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member ViperGTS/Z1 Posted March 24 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 24 1 hour ago, Mainecat said: Your so fuckin uninformed about the case. .... 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voodoo Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 7 hours ago, ViperGTS/Z1 said: He should be reimbursed for taxes he paid on the "inflated" prices. I suppose that could have been part of the evidence. Did he pay tax at the values he thought the properties were worth? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.